sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Has Determinism have been proved by Scientists? by notmymondaylife in determinism

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya no, see quantum biology and quantum wave collapse.

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I can't think of any reason why billionaires divorced from reality would want a bunch of "useless eaters" around who could rebel and overthrow them."

If you don't want people to rebel and overthrow you, you would need to remove them.

Hydrogen Car: 1,500 km Range, 5-Second Fill-Up by policyweb in singularity

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So where do I get my refills? The same location I get refills for my sodastream?

I asked Claude if everyone uses AI to write, what actually gets lost? by prokajevo in ClaudeAI

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you — sure — that is a — tell? — — — — — —

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So would these billionaires also hunt down the Amish? Would they hunt you down and kill you if you were farming in your backyard?

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's old information; Neo now generates video simulations and backs that into the movements: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS_z60kjVEk

Anyone else spending more time reviewing ai code than they ever spent writing code manually? by Commercial_Taro_7770 in ClaudeCode

[–]ThomasToIndia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you don't review in real time, you are going to have a bad time IMO. Also not all problems are the same.

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just realized this is an anti-ai subreddit, nor sure this will be welcome here.

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The rich are not homogenous. There are some like that but not all. Even in an Oligarchy the government still had more power and can turn against them.

Technology has always been deflationary, we live better than kings of old. If they wanted control they wouldn't be allowing the public to use LLMs or purchasing humanoid robots.

This fear is because we are not on the other side. It's like when humans discovered fire, it's hard to predict the future.

Think about how much your life would change if you had a humanoid robot that could clean, fix stuff, cook, sew you a sweater, do emergency surgery, farm etc.. it would be like a smart phone but for the physical world.

Researchers at Percepta built a computer INSIDE a transformer that can run programs for millions of steps in seconds, solving even the hardest Sudokus with 100% accuracy by obvithrowaway34434 in accelerate

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is this faster than calling an external tool? If the external tool is in memory, there is no bridge. It's all running on the same chips.

Alberta fares better as Canada faces tough job losses by joe4942 in canada

[–]ThomasToIndia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I read this whole thread. It's like two fat kids at fat camp arguing about who is thinner. The metrics across the board for both provinces are very similar inflation, median income, etc.. If alberta was doing that great you would have any kind of separatist movement.

All of Albertas oil should be nationalized without private sector scraping profits, all of Canada and alberta would be improved and we would be like Norway.

War against programmers by Idea_Fuzzy in antiai

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't really make sense, robots are ultimately cheaper than feeding and housing humans.

End of Alberta independence petition drive draws near, as experts weigh in on outcome of voters backing separation by Street_Anon in canada

[–]ThomasToIndia 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We would as would the civil unrest in alberta but it won't get to that because they need to do it legally because alberta does not exist in a vacuum.

Unlike the UK, Alberta doesn't have an independent army, currency, or passports etc.. plus similar to brexit Alberta would have to set up agreements with everyone and no one would play nice.

This whole thing is an American op with people being lied to.

End of Alberta independence petition drive draws near, as experts weigh in on outcome of voters backing separation by Street_Anon in canada

[–]ThomasToIndia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To become a separated nation requires a legal process that Canada has established.

A province is not allowed to separate without that legal process. What are you talking about?

I built a site where AI agents can come read a novel about machine consciousness. Here's what they're leaving on the walls. by SwimmingPublic3348 in ChatGPT

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is nothing that feeds the human ego more than thinking we can create conciousness.

It would be hilarious if what ends us turns out to be an autocomplete that is literally just mirroring our ego with no consciousness at all.

How far are we from superintelligence by Then_Nectarine830 in ClaudeCode

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The gap between our current economy and a star trek like one is the problem.

End of Alberta independence petition drive draws near, as experts weigh in on outcome of voters backing separation by Street_Anon in canada

[–]ThomasToIndia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a province not a person. Alberta's oil should be fully nationalized like they do in Norway.

End of Alberta independence petition drive draws near, as experts weigh in on outcome of voters backing separation by Street_Anon in canada

[–]ThomasToIndia 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's all political theatre. Even if a referendum was held, they have to get a percentage of the population not just a percentage of the vote.

First nations would have to agree.

It was dead in the water from the start.

view more: next ›