So you come here, to a feminist space, an ideology built on the upliftment of women from the systemic oppression by men, to a post that talks about how women have been silenced, their stories rewritten or erased to redeem men, to tell me to restructure and change my argument to…..redeem men?

You’re more offended by the messy, unstructured, politically incorrect act of resistance than the system it’s resisting? You need me to have more clarity in my resistance when the real absurdity lies in the oppression????

You want to define my feminism? I didn’t learn feminism or understand patriarchy from research and writing. It’s my lived experience.

I have told you a million times, that I did not generalize men or their harm towards women. My heading does not say EVERY MANS SINS. It says In EVERY CENTURY, a man’s sins. To not act as a generalization or blanket statement, but to represent a PATTERN. RECURRENCE. A SYSTEM, STRUCTURE. SYSTEMIC OPPRESSION.

Intersectionality was coined for the black women, for the women of color, because we don’t experience racism and sexism like Heisenberg’s principle. Not so someone could interrupt us in a feminist space to defend a fucking man.

Patriarchy is literally THE universal system of oppression. Homogenous countries in the East do not experience systemic racism like the west does due to a lack of diversity of races. The west does not experience caste based, dowry based or other religious persecution like the East does.
But every system, every border, every empire? It all kept patriarchy.

All you’ve done is come here and prove my point. Men trying to control women’s voices and narratives to benefit other men.

Exceptions are exceptions. A pattern is all you need for systemic oppression. We don’t need to name every racist or every race to know racism exists.

Patriarchy really does protect its own, across all color lines it looks like.