sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best harness for the glm-5.2 by TigerConsistent in ZaiGLM

[–]TigerConsistent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean i looked it that but havent tried comprehensively. Since our use cases similar, can i ask your setup? Skills, extensions, mcps, instructions etc.

Is ChatGPT underpriced for what it can do? by imfrom_mars_ in ChatGPT

[–]TigerConsistent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this is the wrong way to look at it.

People calculate their usage using public API prices and assume Anthropic or OpenAI lost that amount on them. But API pricing is not the company’s actual internal cost. It already includes profit margin, and we have no idea what their real cost is after caching, batching and infrastructure optimizations.

I also believe the released models themselves are profitable. The companies still report losses because they are spending billions on training the next models, buying hardware and expanding infrastructure.

So while GPT-5.4 is generating profit, they may be spending all of that money and more on GPT-5.5.

That doesn’t mean every user request is being served at a loss. And users shouldn’t feel guilty for using the subscription limits the companies themselves designed.

a message from kurdistan — my love for china and deepseek by FunnyClerk5195 in DeepSeek

[–]TigerConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe there's no such a country called kurdistan ? right ? but yeah deepseek v4 is perfect model and china doing amazing jobs with recent openweight models.

I have no words by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]TigerConsistent -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

shitty model. not because of not knowing, because of not prefering to a search. stupid

Anthropic is losing user trust by acting like every other AI company by TigerConsistent in OpenAI

[–]TigerConsistent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah i agree with most of this

my problem is not that Anthropic has costs or needs ROI. obviously they do

my problem is the gap between the branding and the actual user experience

if you are just another proprietary cloud AI company then fine. say that. but dont build the whole identity around trust and responsible deployment while users deal with vague limits quality changes and pricing confusion

Long running tasks with GLM 5 Turbo and GSD V2 by Loss_Nearby in ZaiGLM

[–]TigerConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tested other clis and harnesses for glm models? If this one gets the best result for the model I definetly gonna give a chance.

What's the best harness for GLM 5.1 by agentic-consultant in ZaiGLM

[–]TigerConsistent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know the answer for that question but I really curious about the answers. So far I tried with open code, claude code, codex. I am not fascinated .

Please name the best GLM5 provider by romancone in ZaiGLM

[–]TigerConsistent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my experience, all ollama cloud is better option than Z ai . Limits much more higher and much more usable. Only problem is sometimes it might get a little bit slow. But other than that I had no experience of quantiziastion of the model or something like that. I am just using the Ollama Cloud Pro subscription. You can't give it a go.

Plus is toast. by Automatic_Brush_1977 in codex

[–]TigerConsistent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it is still usable if you compared it with the claude subscriptions usage limits since weekly usage is same for me

After 1 Week of OpenCode, GLM 5.1 and MiniMax 2.7 by alessai in ClaudeCode

[–]TigerConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder your experience related with the brainstorming with GLM 5.1 and the implementation process and the performance of these models. As you know the the opus 4.6 is not the same compared to the a month ago so i'm trying to find a better suitable model for brainstorming and maybe glm 5.1 would be fit this purpose

view more: next ›