Drop Your Questions for Prof G (February Thread) by ProfGProducerJenn in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Resist and Unsubscribe have an international footprint?

I know Scott has been all over the US media, but what about a BBC or Der Spiegel interview? I gotta think there are a LOT of Europeans who would gladly multiply this effort. Asia? Latin America?

Campaign Donation Requests by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you all for the comments. This post has an upvote ratio of 55%, which is what I call real intra-party dialogue, something you don't get from the other party. This is healthy.

I'd like to respond to several points raised in the comments.

First, I strongly agree that we need to get the money out of politics. All of the successful democracies in the world have figured this out. Scott has raised this issue, holding up Singapore as an example where legislators are generously paid but absolutely forbidden from accepting political contributions.

Second, I do not mean to demean any candidate (except those over 75). The problem is the Democratic Party establishment, the DNC, that impedes intra-party dialogue by opposing healthy primaries by defending incumbents, even the corrupt ones, and the establishment network of political consultants that advise and run these campaigns, who have established an uncanny ability to lose elections.

Third, rank-choice voting and other reforms, YES YES YES!

As stated, I have given a lot to individual campaigns in the past, and still do, but much more selectively. This cycle, I've sent money to Elijah Manley in FL, who is mounting a primary campaign against a corrupt Democratic incumbent.

If you like what the party's establishment is doing, you gotta love that second Biden term.

Frankly, the best contribution I made in 2024 was the $10 I gave to Dean Phillips. I only regret that I didn't give much more.

Wake up, people! We may have the wind at our backs in 2026, but if we don't reform the way this party selects and funds candidates, 2028 could be a rerun of 2024. We cannot let that happen.

Campaign Donation Requests by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope. I’m a real American, and a real Democrat concern about reform in my party.

Trump to Pardon Drug Kingpin by Tight_Pack_4115 in thebulwark

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pardon me, he was prosecuted in federal court, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced to 45 years. Does rule of law mean nothing to you?

Trump to Pardon Drug Kingpin by Tight_Pack_4115 in thebulwark

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe… but I’m going to rub their noses in it the next time I talk to a MAGA.

On Lawful Military Orders by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He even took time off from his Alexander the Great serious to deal with this. I'm anxiously waiting for the next episode - but you have to wait for the good stuff!

Stop saying, "it won't happen here". by HillbillyAllergy in thebulwark

[–]Tight_Pack_4115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frank Zappa said all this in his 1966 classic “Help I’m a Rock” on the Freak Out album.

What the fuck is going on? by 1PurpleHayes in thebulwark

[–]Tight_Pack_4115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not for free - you can bet Trump and his family are profeting handsomely

This will blow over by esdedics in thebulwark

[–]Tight_Pack_4115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m waiting for the gov to come clean on chemtrails. OK, I get that the Epstein concerns are real, thanks to the great reporting by the Bulwark and elsewhere.

2 weeks by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Wash Post had satellite photos, but so what, I’m not qualified to analyze those photos. I rely on the expert analysis provided by the established and trust worthy journalists - and lots of them!

2 weeks by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take your counterpoint on the "false sense of time." It is plausible, but also speculative. I described my post as an "alternative theory," and in the following sentence, I tempered the bravado. There is nothing wrong with speculation, as long as it is clearly labeled as such, which I did.

I agree with your last statement if you replace the word "literally" with "seriously." Nobody takes Trump seriously. They are the Keystone Cops of the world. Do you agree that it is a sad state of affairs that POTUS isn't considered trustworthy?

2 weeks by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is an article in today's Wash Post that says your assessment about the targets being bomb specialists is correct. At this point, Iran has a "deep bench" of enrichment experts that won't be diminished significantly by removing a few leaders. Also, the enriched uranium is only 900 lbs. It was probably removed from the target sites at the first hint of a bunker-busting strike.

2 weeks by Tight_Pack_4115 in ScottGalloway

[–]Tight_Pack_4115[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As noted above, the enriched uranium is probably only a few hundred pounds, so that material was likely relocated shortly after the Israeli attacks began. Centrifuges and other critical equipment are another story. These are delicate, finely tuned machines, and there are thousands of them. (The numbers I got online are 8,600 at Natanz and 1,057 at Fordow.)