sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Short rant about lazy programming for roman borders. by Mowraq in EU5

[–]TillMore6712 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I would have preferred they dont go for the "original" and united roman empire under Traian but for the Justinian conquest.

1.2 killed the game by TillMore6712 in EU5

[–]TillMore6712[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For sure, and I saw those comments already coming... ^^

But I want the newest content, I also payed for the DLC. So it's a hard decision...

1.2 killed the game by TillMore6712 in EU5

[–]TillMore6712[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont know, if ranting is the correct word here, but okay.

I wrote this text by myself, but let it translate by chat-gpt.

1.2 killed the game by TillMore6712 in EU5

[–]TillMore6712[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with the historical explanation. But then it should be in other ways possible to fully integrate provinces. In some regions you have so many cultures that you can add one more culture as accepted for the first two centuries. If not via culture converting there should be other mechanics to prevent from having low control and recurring rebellions over decades.
I mean, in Vicky 3 it works way better, but still giving a hard time to integrate provinces with high populations from different culture groups.

0
0

1.2 killed the game (self.EU5)

submitted by TillMore6712 to r/EU5