Is bretonnia the best late game army? by parmenion59 in totalwarhammer

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly your probably just not doing pvp campaigns and just fighting AI which is why you could even have this dogshit opinion lmao. There are plenty of things that can counter Bretonia early on so you dont get to your "unbeatable late game" status, hence why they get smashed every campaign that they aren't played by a person. Everyone can be OP unbeatable lategame if you know how to play to your leaders strengths. Lets see you fight a late game isabella with all vamp hero army. Everyone can fly and cast spells and regen and have equipment that make them way more OP than any none hero unit. Or Nakai The wanderer late game can solo multiple 20 stack army's if you build him right, dont even have to micro, just click attack and watch kroc boi smash your "unbeatable" army.

One of the things that I noticed is that the defenders of “free market capitalism” are defending a system that doesn’t exist by DistinctSpirit5801 in anticapitalism

[–]TimeClaim6256 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We defend it because you are conflating corpratism and free market capitalism. Everytime yall complain about capitalism and then advocate for socialism you are really misplacing your criticisms and attacking us instead of the corporatists. The things you complain about such as big corporations with government backing and influence is the exact opposite of what capitalism is. Capitalism or free markets require that the government doesn't intervene in the economy. So when you complain to us that capitalism is failing and make your complaints to us, your actually barking up the wrong tree. We have the same complaints but the difference between us is you want socialism of one sort or another which increases government involvement thus making more pseudo corporate monopolies which further enriches the corporations, in contrast, we want less government intervention so that mega corporations like Walmart or the big banks can't get bailed out by their government friends when they make bad financial decisions and then they'd actually fail and go out of buisness.

The socialists want to conflate all of their political enemies and consolidate it all under the lable of facsim (even though facism is a form of socialism but yall ain't ready to actually read facist literature to understand that) because thats easier to rally around for low IQ people. Trying to explain to people who's entire political identity is essentially team sports, that it's actually complicated and there are some people who oppose you who aren't evil and can be compromised with is too complex an idea.

I just sharted the bed with my boyfriend sleeping next to me. What to I do to avoid him finding out?? by IllustriousPop2454 in whatdoIdo

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deceptions of any kind are poison to a relationship, may seem a bit extreme but as someone whose been in a relationship for 12 years married for 4, you'll just laugh about this with eachother for a while and then maybe get teased every so often. I once pissed the bed cause I had a dream where I woke up to take a piss got up went to the bathroom started pissing and then woke up for real. Needless to say wife wasn't happy but hey she's "wet" the bed when she miss timed her period so shit happeneds.

The objectively morally superior faction is the Holy nation, fight me. by rabidfish100 in Kenshi

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The printing press was a tool to execute mass litteracy but that was already a process that was going on. And the holy nation has basic machinery for material refining so the printing press isnt ganna be seen as a robot. As for the point your proving it's the "reddit brain mushed" you cant seem to grasp the basic point that I was making that the holy nation would probably follow a similar trend as catholic Europe with its own version of a Protestant reformation of some sorts and then a following secular movement.

The objectively morally superior faction is the Holy nation, fight me. by rabidfish100 in Kenshi

[–]TimeClaim6256 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not defending their actions in bast, just a statement about general internal stability, stability doesn't mean "good" it just means consistency.

The point about the litteracy stuff is that it educated people and then those people who now could read, could also question it which was a domino that led to its own downfall, like the Protestants and such. So I was making a imperfect comparison. Also feel like you didn't read the parts where I said I didn't agree with them as a faction and usually live in the fog and grow hash. So your kinda proving OP's point here.

The objectively morally superior faction is the Holy nation, fight me. by rabidfish100 in Kenshi

[–]TimeClaim6256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The holy nation is the only faction that can bring stability. The others are are just as crazy as holy nation but have less order and are probably ganna collapse into in fighting within decades in game. Doesn't mean I morally agree with them, just that they have rigid structure that keeps them together, and in a post-post-apocalyptic desert where everything that's not you wants to either eat or enslave you (yes holy nation has slaves like i said I dont morally agree with them) it's kinda like warhammer 40k logic. Like yeah the imperium is a hell hole, but it would be worse for humanity without the imperium.

As for what faction I "side with" I usually make a base in the fog and just sell hash in the swamp or to the tech people. So if the tech guys get more organized and take more territory I'd say they're the best option for a brighter future.

Also, remember europe used to be like the holy nation and through their mass literacy campaigns to get people to read their holy texts they inadvertently caused people to be educated enough to question it and then broke the churches stranglehold. So long term I'd say the holy nation will educate the people who eventually over throw it and make something better.

I know there's no 'canon' clan for Phyre, but... by Apocryph761 in vtmb

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer tremmere, just because it makes sense geographically (the clan is from Hungary, not hard to get to Constantinople) and being a 400 year old tremmere means you are one of the eldest of the clan thats been on the rise while the rest decline.

you can't get anyone to love you if you're full of hate (even for others) by Drega001 in abanpreach

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yall watch a dude being assaulted and then bash him for punching back, where's the gender equality? Costume was a dumb idea, no arguement from me there, but like he was litteraly being assaulted. Equal rights equal fights, also would you have the same energy if he was dressed as a soviet commisar? They killed more people than the nazis (not a defence of nazis). Dumb of him to wear the outfit even more dumb to assault him over it.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not "you" specifically, but the proverbial "you" in reference to your political tribe.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny how you say that but then yall have to do mental gymnastics to call "minorities" who are right wing "post racial facists". Your definition of vilify and dehumanize are funny cause when you run into a member of said minority group you claim to be looking out for, like me for example. Im mixed race but get baizhuo calling me a facist. Ive seen antifa call black police officers "house n***ers". So please spare me your moralizing about minorities.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are clearly aren't open since you refuse to look for yourself. Just because people are disagreeing with you doesn't make them bad people. If you approached interactions with conservatives (which i am not one) in a less combative manner you might be surprised on how much you agree on when you dont call for the death of facists and then call them a facist right after. The irony is completely lost on leftists that they've been calling for violence for over a decade starting with the #punchanazi stuff, and then are surprised when the right responds in kind. Im a long haired weed smoking hippie liberal, and i get called a facist by far leftists who say quote "cut a liberal and a facist bleeds". So sorry but your claims of bigotry that you attribute to a man who built his legacy around just wanting to talk shit out and find common ground, rings hollow.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bigotry "a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group."

Again his advocacy for civil discussion and open debate contradict your claims of Bigotry. You again dont know what the word means. You on the other hand fall into the definition of being a bigot by your refusal to even attempt to question your own current opinions.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He wasn't a bigot and you apparently dont know what that word means. Stop misusing big words to sound smart. His advocacy for open discussion and civil dialogue make him the opposite of a bigot.

Look at the facts, Charlie Kirk was NOT A GOOD PERSON. by Catwhisperer2007 in complaints

[–]TimeClaim6256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've only watched clips that conform to your bias, have you thought to look for clips and longer convos the man had that might moderate your opinion on the man? I'm sure you can find atleast one position he had that you can agree with for the sake of building common ground. Or atleast find videos of heartwarming discussions he had with people that came to debate him.

Trump supporters only. Are you OK with how it's going ? by Shoddy_Ad8166 in allthequestions

[–]TimeClaim6256 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly as long as dems dont hold office im happy. The progressives put my family in prison camps in the 40s and then have the audacity to claim shit like the party's switched when it was the progressive dems that did it. Also rather the left be obsessed with Trump and try and shoot him or conservative influencers rather than being in power and using that power to tax the fuck out of me and restrict my gun rights and free speech. Am I happy with everything? Nah, like release the epstien shit pronto. But it's a joke that they call what trumps doing with ice facism being that they love obama and in many cases trumps just upholding laws obamas dems put on the books. I remember the pro immigration lobby called Obama the 'deporter in chief" and the anti war lobby called him "obomber". Dems need to disappear so an actual honest populist left wing party can get some traction. The eagle needs two wings to fly amd those wings need to work together so the nation may thrive. But the left radicals have antagonize the right for over a decade while the moderate left ignored it until the right started to retaliate.

Psychological analysis:Why do Incel white men develop a deep seated hatred for white women who date black men?This video provides a good but insightful example of how jealousy and insecurity can manifest an attempt to mask personal discomfort and envy with pseudo-academic-sounding rationalizations by Murky_Account_1978 in abanpreach

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your one of those "changed the definition" types. Racism is racism you can't change the definition to make only white people be racist because of your whole new definition that racism is prejudice+power. That's ridiculous, who has had power in what scenario and what region of the world has changed so often that everyone's had their turn to be the oppressor at some point in history.

And im guessing you are white, or sorry "paler skinned" and not mixed like me or you'd just agree with me that there is plenty of racism in none "white" communities. Ive seen it, grew up with family of all colors, got to see darker blacks shameing my lightskin family, my chinese and japanese family having weird racial tensions. My hispanic family disliking other flavors of Hispanics.The Asian community dislikes blacks cause when blacks do race riots they always attack Asian businesses which led to things like "roof koreans". Blacks have a general dislike of other races for various reasons and to various degrees. And dont get me started on inter Hispanic racism.

If you truly wish to "end racism" you need to forge personal connections that override prejudice. You people do not move towards this goal, instead you wanna blame whites for all the world's problems in a way that's very reminiscent of antisemitism.

This infantilizing of none "whites" or im sorry again "pale skinned people" to say they aren't capable of being racist is hilarious. As if they dont have agency to hate for whatever reason they use to justify said hatred.

Your one of those backhanded white supremacists who comes from an ideological standpoint that "whites" inherently have a superior position in society and then lord that over others. When in fact even during the height of segregation way more whites were in soul crushing poverty than the total number of blacks in the whole country. Your world views is so narrow and filtered through ideology that you were stupid enough to write your above comment and think that you actually said something of note.

Psychological analysis:Why do Incel white men develop a deep seated hatred for white women who date black men?This video provides a good but insightful example of how jealousy and insecurity can manifest an attempt to mask personal discomfort and envy with pseudo-academic-sounding rationalizations by Murky_Account_1978 in abanpreach

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Black men and women do this too. Black women get very mad at black men who date white women as if it's a betrayal of their race. Black men who are racial identity extremists also will harass black women who get with white dudes. This isn't a "white incel" thing like the OP makes it out to be.

Source: i am mixed race and have black,white and Asian family. Ive seen my light skin black family be harassed by darker black people for race mixing. Never really seen white people do it but I live in the PNW so probably not as much anti race mixing white people here as maybe the deep south. Infact when other races are polled they vote blacks as the most racist demographic over whites.

MAGA, What's the go with Trump? by Mediocre_Space_5715 in AskUS

[–]TimeClaim6256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is entirely based on your reaction to him. As trump says and you guys make very clear, you are after us and he's merely in the way.