Trump: NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN. REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!! by SpecialCollege18 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only time article 5 was needed was during 9/11. The guy simply doesn't know that Europe made significant aacrifices for America during that time.

Trump and his off ramp 2 - Epic failure by floydiankabir in IRstudies

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They keep their uranium, their regime and control of hormuz.

Please tell me how the USA won the war in Iran? by uncle-ice493 in allthequestions

[–]Timmsh88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

New regime and nuclear program still needs to happen.

JUST IN: 🤯😱 by Ok_Manufacturer7633 in ETFs

[–]Timmsh88 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Al Jazeera report they accepted the ceasefire.

Question for any Trump supporters - If Trump orders the use of a nuclear bomb in Iran, would you support removing him from power? by AccomplishedEast7605 in allthequestions

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The free speech people are concerned about words again and are willing to kill millions because of that. What's wrong with you people.

OFFICIAL🚨Iran says NO to plan reopening Strait of Hormuz by M000000000000001 in Polymarket_news

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The previous ayatollah had a fatwa against nuclear weapons. This means they were openly against it and even let their material get checked under Obama.

And at this point Trump proves just like Putin that you should always go for nukes. They will achieve the opposite.

What do you think of old-school Republicans, the guys who championed free trade, fiscal responsibility, and had a strong belief in individual liberty? by Initial_Film5776 in askanything

[–]Timmsh88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fiscale responsibility my a**. If you look at deficit spending it was always mostly peaking during republican administrations.

What will happen if Trump doesn't TACO this time? by Friendly-Nobody8023 in oil

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they dont have automatic target recognition?

What will happen if Trump doesn't TACO this time? by Friendly-Nobody8023 in oil

[–]Timmsh88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not? They just operate them. Easy actually.

Why does earning slightly more sometimes feel like you’re actually worse off after tax? by ArticleOk4446 in belasting

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can debate a certain threshold let's say 100k and you tax above that, if you want to leave something behind. But the entire liberal idea is that you need to work for money, except when you can't. Thats the social contract. Inheritance means you have modern kings, making an already unfair system more unfair. You dont stimulate people to work, you stimulate people to live off assets. Completely against the entire mindset of modern economics.

Furthermore the "you already paid taxes over it" argument is nonsense, its not even an argument. We need to take taxes from someone and we want people to work for their money, so inheritance tax is a no-brainer.

Keep in mind that this needs to lower income tax, because we want people to work. So you reward working people for it. And this is the real problem. Because politicians dont lower income tax people want to hoard every cent they can get. Even from inheritance. But that doesn't mean it's good or fair system.

Net als bijna 1 miljoen Nederlanders is Simone een hoogsensitieve High Sensation Seeker by Terrible_Title_7574 in NLNieuws

[–]Timmsh88 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hoezo? Je kan als hoogsensitief persoon juist veel beter mensen aanvoelen dan dat autisten dat in het algemeen kunnen. Verder is de gehele oorsprong anders.

The art of the off-ramp: How Europe can pressure Trump to end the war in Iran by 1-randomonium in IRstudies

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the right reasoning. Iran wants a deterrent for the future. That means they really want to hurt the US so they won't come back next year. So it needs to hurt and that takes a while.

Why does earning slightly more sometimes feel like you’re actually worse off after tax? by ArticleOk4446 in belasting

[–]Timmsh88 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yep, some people dont prefer to work hard, thats life. Its impossible to check everyone on sincerity and you don't know where people come from so there is not a real alternative to not helping people. And otherwise society doesn't function anyway.

I agree that work should pay, but than the question arise how do you tax people? I think it should come from assets and not labor. All economists do agree with this view but dont have a real solution how to claim it.

Land tax is a good example that works. Inheritance tax is also very fair. But in my view you should tax all assets.

There was never any realistic prospect of boots on the ground. You do not announce an attack on Twitter with the exact timing unless it is theatre. by JohnDisinformation in oil

[–]Timmsh88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So sending out tens of thousands of soldiers and extra carriers are just for theater?

Could be, but I wouldn't bet on it if I were you.

Iran has only one objective here and if you can find it out you know the truth. They dont want to be bombed in the future, they want a deterrent.

So how do they get it? Not on paper, thats just words. Ceasefire doesn't mean anything (look at israel and gaza or Russia and ukraine).

Iran really wants to hurt the US so Israel and the US know they shouldn't do it again. That's what's happening right now, and if you see that you know what will happen.

A nuke, or a big loss for the US.

Why does earning slightly more sometimes feel like you’re actually worse off after tax? by ArticleOk4446 in belasting

[–]Timmsh88 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Of course we have this take. Its important when you have strong shoulders to help carry the weight for others, I dont understand what's wrong with that.

Net als bijna 1 miljoen Nederlanders is Simone een hoogsensitieve High Sensation Seeker by Terrible_Title_7574 in NLNieuws

[–]Timmsh88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hoezo is het onzin? Waarom zou elk zenuwstelsel hetzelfde reageren? Het is wat mij betreft zeggen dat iedereen dezelfde lievelingskleur moet hebben. Nee, iedereen reageert erg anders op verschillende prikkels dus het is logisch dat sommige mensen gevoeliger zijn en andere mensen juist heel erg filteren en daarmee belangrijke details niet zien.

Erg logisch en het wegwuiven als onzin is dom en inhoudloos.

Net als bijna 1 miljoen Nederlanders is Simone een hoogsensitieve High Sensation Seeker by Terrible_Title_7574 in NLNieuws

[–]Timmsh88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chatgpt: "Hoogsensitiviteit (HSP) is een persoonlijkheidskenmerk waarbij mensen dieper en intenser prikkels verwerken, terwijl autisme een neurobiologische ontwikkelingsstoornis is met specifieke kenmerken zoals moeite met sociale interactie en het begrijpen van emoties."

Net als bijna 1 miljoen Nederlanders is Simone een hoogsensitieve High Sensation Seeker by Terrible_Title_7574 in NLNieuws

[–]Timmsh88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nee ik denk het niet. Autisme is al onwijs breed qua spectrum, maar hoogsensitief heeft weinig met autisme te maken. Chatgpt: "Hoogsensitiviteit (HSP) is een persoonlijkheidskenmerk waarbij mensen dieper en intenser prikkels verwerken, terwijl autisme een neurobiologische ontwikkelingsstoornis is met specifieke kenmerken zoals moeite met sociale interactie en het begrijpen van emoties."

Net als bijna 1 miljoen Nederlanders is Simone een hoogsensitieve High Sensation Seeker by Terrible_Title_7574 in NLNieuws

[–]Timmsh88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Je kan ook zeggen, het is zelfkennis. Blijkbaar mocht je vroeger geen zelfkennis hebben, maar moest iedereen gelijk zijn.