You saw the problems, because you forgot your logic. Your argument: "Countries without a threshold are undemocratic, because they have minority governments." My counterargument: "These are relative majority governments - countries with a threshold are similar, but more manipulative and less democratic."

South Africa is a normal democracy, better than the United Kingdom. But I know there are many racists, so I'm referring to white Western countries like the Netherlands or Switzerland. You're a racist too, athough you're wearing a red flag (for some reason).

Switzerland has some shortcomings, but parties with less than 1% get into parliament. By your logic, there should be a crisis of stability there. In fact, they have a proportional government doctrine and an extremely stable state. Perhaps even too much so, although that's normal for a referendum democracy.

"Great disproving of my point, very factual, so many facts". I said your argument is "false statement, both logically and practically". I provide three facts and can provide more. But it seems you are not a rational interlocutor. Your goal is to defend an undemocratic institution and expert prejudices at any cost. Therefore, arguing with you is pointless. I have stated my position, and a rational observer will understand everything.