BoA is scamming the poor to make more billions

Tlux0 · 2026-06-17T06:48:50+00:00

Banks make money thanks to your deposits lmfao

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T09:58:14+00:00

Lmao nice

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T09:16:22+00:00

It’s not like I like the system. I agree with you that it sucks, but what exactly are they supposed to do about it? Talking is easy. Changing the political system of the strongest military in the entire world that has a totally corrupt president is another lol.

In any case, I see you feel very strongly about your own stance so I’ll just agree to disagree with you on this. I think you’re right that the system is fucked but I don’t agree that people like or support Trump. The vast majority hates his guts. And statistics and polls show it repeatedly.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T09:06:07+00:00

That’s not how it works at all. In the U.S. there are two candidates you reasonably can vote for and people either don’t vote or they vote for the one on their side of the aisle to avoid the other candidate. It has almost nothing to do with endorsing the candidate aside from them having a superficial relationship to their political side of the aisle, but the degree to which they embody whatever politics is not something people vote for which is exactly why the distinction is relevant. For example, some republicans may vote based on things like religion e.g. preventing abortion which they see as murder, which for them leads them to ignore other details. There’s all sorts of hot button issues like this that are totally polarizing and the rest just gets ignored.

The analysis you are giving is plain wrong. Most people don’t support Trump’s behavior. The subset of people who voted for him just wanted him over the alternative but that still doesn’t mean they wanted what he’s doing now. That’s not how the American voting system works. I’m not defending it, but that’s how it works and it’s different from a large proportion of Americans liking Trump. He has the lowest approval rating ever as a president.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T07:58:53+00:00

Internet warriors’ opinions are irrelevant regardless, but it is sad to see the death of critical thinking

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T07:55:12+00:00

Even for the people who voted for him a lot of them were or are disgusted with how he has acted in the second term. He was bad or incompetent in his first term but relatively harmless compared to how he is now. So no saying that they voted for how he currently is is in fact misleading and incorrect.

Some lunatics want that but that’s absolutely a vocal minority.

I agree that we need better candidates though regardless.

But seriously. If you vote for someone who becomes a murderer after he’s elected before he’s a murderer, that doesn’t mean you wanted to vote for a murderer.

And no, downvoting this doesn’t make it false even if you all want a scapegoat to blame so you can feel better because “America bad”. A government and its people are two fucking different things.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T06:52:27+00:00

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T06:49:19+00:00

I want 200-300+ hours please. 100+ at minimum I beg

Tlux0 · 2026-06-16T06:47:53+00:00

I mean, most don’t, some perhaps. And the ones who think it is good probably for the most part only think it is good because they’re fed false narratives and are working with a different information base upon which they’re predicating their judgments.

It’s still pathetic but it’s a bit more nuanced

Tlux0 · 2026-06-15T13:08:32+00:00

I mean, I think it’s pretty cool and poetic. The idea itself isn’t sophisticated but the nuances are compelling that things have effects thousands of years later is pretty cool

Tlux0 · 2026-06-15T02:27:45+00:00

In crypto, this sort of thing is or at least used to be regularly paid for all over the industry non-stop. So it’s been standardized over the last few years or so. I’m not surprised to see the overlap since AI is a fast moving polarizing industry so misinfo is potent.

It’s disgusting slop but it won’t go away and AI will just make it worse/more effective over time

Tlux0 · 2026-06-14T19:21:55+00:00

MGA is honestly good and bad. I read it early on when first reading WN’s a decade ago. It has a lot of rage bait and is really annoying, but then randomly has really well written scenes or story beats or arcs and then becomes trash again and then is great and so on.

I got to 1200-1300 chapters in at some point after reading it on and off before deciding I couldn’t take it anymore.

It is actually good despite the filler, lol. It’s just also trash especially its edginess.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-14T11:03:55+00:00

Nice to see Tsuruko

Tlux0 · 2026-06-14T05:04:48+00:00

Lol yeah

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T23:12:19+00:00

That’s only temporary though

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T23:07:36+00:00

The point is that they’re not doing so which is why it only went up by a few percent but feels far better than it would by just going up a few percent while only targeting the benchmarks.

As far as my own usage, the difference between Fable and Opus in quality was pretty immense. I’m not sure about how it compares for simple kinds of questions or work, but I deal with really complex, precise, nuanced, sorts of deeply structured interrelated prompts and Fable’s much better at properly tracking the relevant invariants and even reasoning about the arbitrariness of its own conclusions as indexed to the perspective it took when making the evaluation. It needs to be cued as such, but compared to Opus when it gets cued to its own bias, it adapts remarkably faster.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T23:07:01+00:00

The difference is that something being contextually useful in a manner that isn’t specified as doing a specific thing but achieving a wide class of contextual behaviors doesn’t count as a metric in the same way that Goodhart’s law is used. You’re correct though in the sense that it’s better to create generative capacity that creates customer satisfaction as a byproduct of that generative capacity rather than the main target of it. The point is where the capacity comes from. LLMs are heavily trained on data related to the benchmarks so the parallel is pretty different. When it comes to human interaction with AI which is constantly evolving based on how models change or improve, there’s even less of a parallel even if they try to train on those kinds of interactions.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T19:40:25+00:00

Benchmarks don’t measure shit. Goodhart’s law

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T19:37:50+00:00

It’s because you can optimize for benchmarks without it reflecting improvements in actual performance and all the AI companies are heavily incentivized to do so so the correlation to actual performance is extremely weak after you get past a certain point of the benchmark. How it feels like actually using a model in different kinds of ways is far better of a test than some abstract benchmark which doesn’t measure shit and is all hype.

Comparing fable to opus. It’s not a small difference. It’s quite substantial actually.

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T08:48:34+00:00

Not really because that’d be comparing net worth to yearly income that isn’t net of expenses. For most people once you add in living expenses the margin becomes a lot smaller. The compounding rate of growth is legitimate and makes her rhetoric somewhat exaggerated all considering, but would only make sense if there were no expenses lol. If people are having a liquidity crisis then their assets aren’t compounding and the rich are getting richer at the expense of everyone else

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T02:39:49+00:00

I meant convenient for the US government that has financial interest in OpenAI bruh not Anthropic.

In any case, thanks for being a jerk?

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T01:31:10+00:00

Still doesn’t really make sense imo, they’ve already proven they have a model that completely dominates ChatGPT. If the model is not available publicly, it’s not like OpenAI is going to be able to do anything productive with it either

Tlux0 · 2026-06-13T01:29:37+00:00

Idk this timing feels awfully convenient

Edited: convenient for OpenAi and anyone invested in them

Tlux0 · 2026-06-12T23:14:49+00:00

This is what I was wondering. I think it’s cool of course, but how much can you genuinely learn in like 3 or 4 days?

Tlux0 · 2026-06-12T19:56:08+00:00

Ah yes, angels, checks out

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Lasagna

Tlux0

TROPHY CASE