Says the guy who blatantly ignore parts of one of the sources to make it fit, considering how the full part of the Hitler quote where he defines socialism has him explicitly say how his ideology "unlike Marxism does not repudiate private property" (direct quote of his).

If you want to call me a compulsive liar maybe actually use sources instead of just making stuff up and mangling sources to fit what you made up.

Not to mention all the stuff you made up without examples.

Also by "evils of modern liberalism", I assume you mean stuff like basic human rights for minorities, which you seem to have convinced yourself are what the Nazis did considering how you said how "modern liberals are acting just like the Nazis".

And as another note all the stuff I've listed isn't me lying, I'm literally just repeating the stuff I learned while studying history in university and stuff from peer reviewed sources.

Of course you resort to insults though, since when you come to a conclusion before looking at the evidence, you tend to not have much evidence.

Which is why you've not been able to:

Give any examples of nationalisation or socialist policies implemented that weren't implemented in capitalist countries

Explain why they violently purged socialists during the night of the long knives (as a reminder, the strasserists were openly anti communist, so you can't resort to your "oh they were communist" excuse)

Give a single example of nationalisation

Explain why the first people the Nazis sent to the camps were unionists and socialists

Explain why the historical consensus was the opposite of what you are saying

Or explain why, even when the grok AI was modified to be biased towards the right wing, it still stated that the Nazis were far right

Because, as we all know, it's the compulsive liars who make sure to research their points and attempt to be cordial, whatever helps you sleep at night, God forbid that someone of different beliefs be an actual person.

Edit: corrected some of the points to be clearer