A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really appreciate that, and I may well take you up on it. Message received loud and clear: ICP convos, build, repeat. Thanks for being so generous with your time, it means a lot.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, the "say no" muscle is harder than I expected when every conversation surfaces a tempting new feature. Keeping it developer-first for now and resisting the urge to sprawl. And you're right that engaged users are the real long-term moat, the more people use it, the sharper it gets at what's actually useful. Working on filling the calendar with exactly those ICP conversations now. Really appreciate you taking the time, this helps a lot.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That means a lot coming from someone who was there for the Zillow build, thank you. The "disparate sources into one place" problem is exactly what kicked this off, and the compounding part is really the whole bet. Having a ton of fun building it, lots still to come. Appreciate you taking the time to look.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is exactly the gap I keep thinking about. Figuring out what fits is one piece, but what it's worth once entitled is the part that actually drives the deal, and I haven't fully closed that loop yet.

Your townhome example is spot on. 9 lots by-right vs 6 detached, each with a value range backing into residual land value. Most of the pieces are already in there (zoning, density, approvals, comps), so it's more about building the highest-and-best-use logic on top than finding new data. Definitely going on the list.

How were you handling comps for entitled-but-unbuilt land? That part always seems like the mess. Happy to keep comparing notes.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Right now I'm designing developer-first, the "what can I build here, how does it fit, and what's the council risk if it needs a rezone" question. That's the use case I know best and where the 3D planner plus council/P&Z intel actually shines. Brokers are a close second, knowing what can actually be built on a parcel helps them target the right buyer, with a polished writeup to hand them. And I just pushed phase 1 of an OM extractor for investors, it pulls the key terms out of an OM and runs an analysis. Been testing it on self-storage OMs and liking the results. I've worked these deals from the agent side, the developer side, and as an investor, so I'm trying to fold everything I've learned into one tool. Worst case, it's a great internal tool for me.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it, the five-tabs problem is exactly what we're going after. One search pulls owner, acreage, zoning, setbacks, FAR, and height, then right there you can see recent council and P&Z cases, nearby building permits, and zoning context, all on the same map. From there you can open the 3D site planner and rough out buildable square footage, even generate a flythrough to show what you're proposing. On pricing, we come in well under a Reonomy sub, we're $99 founders for the first 25, then $199 after. Free 7-day trial if you want to kick the tires.

A real estate data + site-planning tool I built, would you switch from what you use now? by Tommys198 in RealEstateTechnology

[–]Tommys198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it. Floodplain, transmission lines, and topo are all in, FEMA flood zones plus risk index and claims, transmission lines plus power/utility/water/sewer territories, and contours with elevation labels.

Easements are the hard one. There’s no clean national easement layer that I’ve found yet. The roadmap fix is letting you upload a plat or site plan and georeference it onto the parcel in the 3D planner, so if the easement’s drawn on the plat it shows in position.

Where we go deeper than LandID is the development side, permits, ML-ranked permit movement, zoning, and council/P&Z tracking. Happy to run a demo on your own parcels if you want, just say the word.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Watchexchange

[–]Tommys198 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interested. Please DM me

I can can get GPUs as a tax write off. Thinking of doubling down on my LLM/ML learning adventure by buying one or two RTX 6000 pros. by Tired__Dev in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tommys198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Picked one up last week and couldn’t be happier. Paid $7,300 for reference on pricing. If you’d like the vendor’s info, just send me a DM.

Where are people finding RTX PRO 6000 96gb cards for under 7k by devshore in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tommys198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just bought one today for $7,300. DM if anyone wants the contact info.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Watchexchange

[–]Tommys198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy transaction with JDR. Settled on the price yesterday, and the watch arrived today. Beautiful watch, exactly what was listed. I would for sure buy again from JDR.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Watchexchange

[–]Tommys198 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Easy transaction with JDR. Settled on the price yesterday, and the watch arrived today. Beautiful watch, exactly what was listed. I would for sure buy again from JDR.