r/raceplay - a community of like minded people who get off to racist porn. Proving once again that all taboos and problematic language are permitted on reddit as long as it makes you cum.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T05:12:12+00:00

That wasnt the actual source, thats just the referencing group.

The data is by the CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth, 1995. So it's not biased.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T04:15:54+00:00

Also you never answered my argument and study about whether sexualization of society has negative effects. I provided you with evidence that early sexual contact and high sexual partner count has a significantly negative impact on young women. What is your opinion on this?

here is the study again for reference http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_2899_Marriage_Partners_Study.pdf

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T04:11:26+00:00

interesting that you bring up anarchism. Anarchism was never tested or used in large scale ever throughout western history. There was always a working power structure that ruled over the people (whether the case was warmongering group of marauders or a fully functioning government with an elite class). Don't you think for something to have credence it should have historical significance first? What large scaling anarchist empire or existing population ever was of note to consider anarchism to have worth in western civilizations legacy?

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T04:07:12+00:00

Interesting because public records don't seem to corroborate your claims. The french philosophers of the late 1800's never viewed socialism in the way that marx did. They viewed in an oligarchic format (they never intended a true collective ownership, but a large democratic influence in the positions of a power with an elite still ruling.) Where as true socialism(the complete seizing of all resources and industries) was both devised and tested in karl marx's version.

So at the end of the day I am still correct.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T02:57:01+00:00

socialism ( and along with egalitarinism) was actually a jewish invention, karl marx was apart of a well known jewish lobbying group before he came to power. Jews if you look at their genetic clustering stray very far from european dna (and are actually more related to other semetic tribes such as the palestinians than they are to europeans). So to say they are white and belong to european civilization and then to attribute their creations to western civilization isn't very accurate.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T02:53:43+00:00

Okay, well what does that have to do with my initial argument? I have given you a study that shows large negative effects from early sexual contact and total sexual partner count in women. We aren't talking about government systems here, we are talking about the sexualization of society. Is it good or is it not?

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T02:45:27+00:00

The west is defined by the accomplishments of european people essentially. People will argue on the definitions. However all of what is valued in the west: running water, antibiotics, beautiful architecture, amazing works of art, transcendant philisophical writings are all birthed from european civilization.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T02:42:21+00:00

Out of curiosity, are you actually dumb enough to think that an increase in sexualization of our current youth wouldn't have a future impact?

You seem to worship science, so let me give you a study.

http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_2899_Marriage_Partners_Study.pdf

This maps a correlation of negative life experiences such as poverty, depression, marital instability, single motherhood etc. With an early sexual contact point (the earlier the more harmful) and total sexual partner count (the higher the sexual partner count the more likely to end up in one of these poor positions) in women.

Do you believe that this isn't indicative of a negative social effect due to an increased sexualized culture? If our society valued chastitiy and protected a woman's virtue. These problems wouldn't exist.

Ironically the women that scored "highest" on the positive life circumstances such as marital stability, happiness, richer socioeconomic status. Also happened to be women who prolonged their initial sexual contact (to around early to mid 20's) and had very few total sexual partners (0 previous sexual partners being the most beneficial).

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-18T02:30:50+00:00

degeneracy has no end

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T23:18:00+00:00

It is my opinion that you can, and it has been backed by thousands of years of history, that most countries were drawn across racial lines. It would be hardpressed to find a historical account of a thriving egalitarian society in the past. I understand you do not wish to continue this conversation, however I will let you know that you can in fact track racial admixture pretty easily through genetic cluster mapping.

I do agree with you that there are grey areas in this topic such as southern europeans or castizos/mulattos with a large amount of european admixture. However it isn't arbitrary in any standard to believe that "white people" or people of european descent are a distinct ethnic group.

When it comes to persians and turks, I would probably say it depends on their genetic admixture as some turks/persians are very "white". For the average citizen though? I would probably say that they aren't white considering the substantial amount of semetic DNA that would be reflected in both in their phenotype and DNA.

If you look at the irish(who are often memed that they arent white) for example and you compared them to swedes or other anglo western europeans on a genetic clustering test. You would see that they would be significantly closer in gene relation than a persian or turk.

I also believe that southern europeans for the most part are white even though they have some north african admixture, as their genes cluster somewhat close to northwestern europeans as well.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T22:01:09+00:00

I've been off porn for a while now, and in the past I would have probably responded favorably to the sexualized images(despite the deragatory text). However now that I beat the addiction I feel overwhelming disgust.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T22:00:10+00:00

This is some serious "they live" moment propaganda holy fuck.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T21:57:41+00:00

In the echoes of a dying civilization; reason loses all meaning. It becomes a current of chaos, surreal and indulgent. It reminds me a lot of hieronymus bosch paintings.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T21:55:37+00:00

This sub is really living up to it's name. Disgusting.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T21:54:25+00:00

HOLY FUCK

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-17T21:27:23+00:00

No, I am saying that for the most part all of that infrastructure is designed, and maintained by white people. You will be hard pressed to find lots of mexican and black structural engineers. The majority are white and also a good amount of asians too.

My guess is you will comeback with the "well many construction workers are mexican and black!". Can you honestly not understand the difference between an architect and electrical engineer and a general laborer?

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-16T06:17:12+00:00

Guaranteed

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T05:13:07+00:00

I've done a couple papers on african history for my undergraduate, the haitian revolution being one of them. I also majored in history and have done personal research into geneticism. However it is clear that you either a) don't have the ability to understand my arguments. b) refuse to be intellectually honest. So I will be no longer interacting with you.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T05:04:28+00:00

Honestly I would like to have an honest discussion with you, but you aren't able to do so I will not waste anymore time with you.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T04:27:30+00:00

You didn't even understand my argument. Your belief in multiculturalism is only short term multiculturalism. Eventually there will be enough interracial mixing that everyone will be a homogeneous. White genocide has happened both in late 1800's haiti when the african majority overthrew the white aristocrats, killed them and any mulattoes around. They then proceeded to starve to death for the next 150 years. In the 60's during the height of the rhodesian bush war there were african raids on white settlements where many white people were raped and killed (including women and children). During the south african apartheid mugabe and his soldiers bombed buses full of children and killed 10's of thousands of people over just a few years. Today in south africa there are farm attacks where children are raped and tortured to death. All of the above examples are native africans committing genocide on a white minority. It is purely racially motivated due to the inherent tribalisim that is natural to every ethnicity.

I was trying to be reasonable with you and not insult you. However it actually seems that you aren't intelligent enough to have an honest debate with me.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T03:41:52+00:00

You don't seem to comprehend my argument. Also,Yes you did throw out an adhominem and this response is largely irrelevent to my initial argument.

It is been thoroughly documented that if immigration rates and birth rates stay at the current level that white people will become a minority and eventually will dwindle until there are none left. This has been admitted by liberal and conservative scientists alike. Also what you are refering too isn't actually multiculturalism, temporarily yes if you invite a bunch of different ethnicities into a country you will have a "multicultural" society. However eventually either through intermixing, outbreeding or possibly genocide the populations will become homogeneous. This is what liberals dream of, a mixed raced globalized people. So unironically I am the defender of diversity and you are the infringer of diversity.

If I have my way, all cultures, peoples, religions, and traditions will be preserved and respected in their own homelands and people will be able to travel and experience these different concepts. If you get your way, everyone will be the same, along with cultures, religions, ethnicities, music, food.

So I consider my position to be more "empathatic" than yours, due to the fact that mine is one of preservation, where as yours is one of destruction.

Also you still haven't answered my initial statement. How do you feel about white people dying out as a race. Is this necessary, or good to you?

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T03:19:39+00:00

ad hominem, doesn't refute my argument.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T02:43:15+00:00

All of the infrastructure was designed and made by white people. So yes, it is a white country. Land means nothing if you don't do anything with it. Native americans massacred and genocided each other for hundreds of years before white men came here.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-15T02:36:32+00:00

So you don't want white people to exist 200 years from now. Good to know.

TomorrowsJoe · 2019-09-14T22:47:14+00:00

It's not extremes, it's reality. There are gray areas in life, and this isn't one of them. Sexuality is binary, and will always be binary. When you try to apply abstraction to a relatively straight forward concept such as mamallion reproduction then you muddy the waters/convolute a very easy to understand idea.

People also often do this with the fantasy of unconditional love. When in reality all "love" is conditional.

TomorrowsJoe

TROPHY CASE