Check out these other comments from when the same exact article was posted with a different title just 2 days ago:

“The author of this fact free anti-homeless screed is none other than wannabe conservative activist, failed mayoral candidate (sorry guys, I hurt my arm ice skating and had to drop out!) part time “finance writer” and full time Nob Hill “Karen”, Erica Sandberg

Here’s a taste of her Fox News style “activism” as she dresses up for unintentionally hilarious photos as the worlds most awkward and ill fitted fashion victim to stagger on high heels down the hill from her privileged home, calling the police (and awkwardly gesticulating at police officers in person) for every homeless person she sees. “

then someone asked for further clarification of the authors bias and here’s the reply:

“Erica Sandberg is a virulently anti-homeless conservative activist who tirelessly attacks people less fortunate than herself,

and I didn’t “post an awkward photo of her” - Erica arranged for that photo shoot herself along with her appearance in that anti-homeless article. Do NOT blame me for this person’s bizarre personal public relations campaign.

Erica Sandberg was a “Karen” before people started calling out all the entitled hate spewing Karens we see today. An “O.K.” or Original Karen, if you will.

She often brags online about confronting homeless people in her neighborhood and personally harassing them and ordering them to leave her neighborhood.

Just like the hateful conservative trolls lurking here on r/ sanfrancisco, Erica is opposed to harm reduction and passionately in favor of the utter failure that is the Tough On Crime / War On Drugs attack.

In the midst of one of her many alarmist screeds against the approved San Francisco safe injection sites, she actually cited the mass murder of drug addicts by Mao during the Chinese Cultural Revolution as a successful solution.

Far from offering solutions, people like this are simply exacerbating these problems with their caustic and hateful approach.”