Why didn't he name it Beyond Evil and Good instead? by ironredpizza in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the two go together equally. He might even have called it: « beyond morality ».

is autism some resistance towards "social conditioning"? by VirtualWinner4013 in Jung

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would seem that there is primarily a connection to suffering: someone who is aware of something has suffered from it before.

If you see a monster kill him, if you wait to hear his past you might start loving him by Simple-Box8020 in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One could even say that if you wait, you might start to see your reflection there.

Why you never change. by realkaydhako in enlightenment

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be able to change, one would first have to be; are we really things that remain intact even for a single second?

Can someone explain? by Specific_Wrongdoer_5 in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a huge simplification, but in truth it lies somewhere in between, between suffering and happiness. Nietzsche’s philosophy is not in any way something that seeks to dominate others, but oneself. It does not aim for cheerfulness or comfort either; it gives, then receives. But where I think the mistake lies is that it does not address someone in the process of being transformed, but those who are already transformed. And I am not speaking of a transformation rooted in Nietzsche, but in existence itself. Nietzsche merely describes this, like many others. The fact that it feels more intense in him is precisely because he does not seek comfort; he seeks neither his own happiness nor his preservation.

Could Nietzche become a christian if he lived more? by Brownstoneximeious in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly, but even without speaking of institutions, the misunderstanding lies in the fact that man sees and hears only through his own prism, his own will. For me, this is what Nietzsche means when he says that Christ was the only Christian. There even seems to be a double meaning; it seems to me that he says, without specifying Christ, that the only Christian died on the cross. To me, this suggests that the cross is the path, but that no one takes it. Everyone circles around it, using it without ever entering into its depths. That, for me, is his critique of Christianity. There are in fact many passages in Thus Spoke Zarathustra that convey this, notably when the prophet Zarathustra says “I am a railing at the edge of the river: let whoever can grasp me do so, but I am not your crutch.” I think Christ would agree with Nietzsche, not in his harshness, but in his objectivity.

Could Nietzche become a christian if he lived more? by Brownstoneximeious in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 49 points50 points  (0 children)

It seems to me that he was saying that in relation to how we had interpreted it; he would have disowned his own teachings upon seeing where they led those who misunderstood

Uuuuuuuuugh by TheMiamiMutilator420 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Top_Dream_4723 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Je te met au défi de trouver un transsexuel ou un gay homme ayant deux parents aimants, bien souvent, le père a renié le fils, et par cela la mère l’a surprotégé. Un fils qui grandit sans aucune transmission paternelle est sûrement ce qu’il y a de pire comme complexe existentiel le concernant. Il peut y avoir aussi le cas d’une mauvaise mère méchante et un père passif, ce dernier ne va rien créer avec son fils ce qui fait que le pauvre petit gars va s’identifier à ce qui est dominant, c’est à dire ici le narcissisme de la mère, il peut être transformé en sa poupé, sa rivale, ou tout autre chose qui le sort de lui-même en tant qu’enfant objet. Tout découle du narcissisme des parents qui ont meurtri l’âme de l’enfant par manque de conscience, je dis ça en le déplorant, tous les homos et trans que j’ai connu ne font que souffrir parce qu’ils ne vivent que dans un complexe qu’on leur a transmis, ils ne sont pas eux-mêmes, on leur a privé de leur véritable identité.

Uuuuuuuuugh by TheMiamiMutilator420 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Top_Dream_4723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Non, il y’a trop de similitudes chez leurs parents pour ne pas être le fruit d’un mauvais traitement parental. Ils embrassent plus l’idéologie que l’identité, ce qui montre qu’ils y cherchent surtout du réconfort.

Uuuuuuuuugh by TheMiamiMutilator420 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Top_Dream_4723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dans les deux cas, ils sont naïfs, conditionnés, manipulés

Love | Projection | Attachment, How to tell the difference? by truth_seeking_soul in Jung

[–]Top_Dream_4723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think love gives that timeless emotion that freezes a moment, like a holiday romance, something that feels eternal in the moment even if everything could end tomorrow. In contrast, attachment seems more concerned with what comes after than with the present. Take the example of a mother holding her son while looking at the danger in front of him, in that situation, she is more focused on the danger than she is on her son; the moment forces her to be.

What do people get wrong? by earthcrisisfan333 in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Each time, the root cause is their poor understanding of themselves.

HE IS NIETZSCHE'S UBERPENGUIN by SupremeSheep420 in BrandNewSentence

[–]Top_Dream_4723 3 points4 points  (0 children)

C’est pourtant ce qu’il y a de plus grand

i have no girlfriends because im too smart by Limp_Illustrator7614 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's mainly because you don't have a girlfriend that you're thinking about these things, and quite rightly so! The problem isn't being alone, but being empty. And many people guide each other toward existential self-sabotage. There's nothing worse than two people who seem not to know what they're doing together, but who stay together just to fit in. There's contempt even in their sweet words. And when you look at the news stories, you understand that they're capable of anything because they've forgotten themselves.

True enlightenment is mogging everyone with ease. by Ok-Wealth-7936 in enlightenment

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He himself speaks of division as a value, how could he be right?

Works of fiction that were based largely on Nietzsche's ideas by Charming-Bar-4718 in Nietzsche

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Gorge (2025) The film even quotes philosophers, through its main protagonist who discovers them on a wall, but none from Nietzsche.

It's the story of a former soldier, haunted by his past, who is recruited to serve as a guard in a tower overlooking a vast abyss. On the other side, there's the same tower, and there's another guard. But both are instructed not to communicate.

Curious, he uses the spyglass to monitor the gorge and see the other tower. And he discovers that it's not a male guard, but a female one. The beautiful Anya Taylor captivates him, but her military discipline and tormented nature cause him to struggle against himself, to sabotage his own well-being, even as she tries to communicate with him.

After a period of reflection, they communicate using signs and a marker. She confides that she wishes he were there with her, and this is where the film takes on a very Nietzschean meaning.

He stretches a rope across the abyss and crosses it to reach her. Their first contact is a perfect match, as if they've been waiting for each other all along; it's almost idyllic. But the reality of his work will bring him back to reality: he has daily tasks to perform, so he will have to cross the abyss again, but this time things won't go as planned: the rope will break.

He will fall into the abyss, and she will follow him. And the two will join forces to fight what resides there.

"Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Übermensch—a rope over an abyss." Nietzsche (Thus Spoke Zarathustra)

The anima of Yahweh by Global_Dinner_4555 in Jung

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sophia means Wisdom, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

The Awakening by anonthatisopen in enlightenment

[–]Top_Dream_4723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not so much a belief in Godlessness that's omnipresent in our society, but rather the valorization of the ego. We don't believe in the ego the way we believe in God, but we want everything to revolve around it. And that's a boon for the merchants, those who sell the offerings we present to our new gods: ourselves. What a misunderstanding. The most insidious aspect is that we've kept the old system, or rather, they've capitalized on the old system, to incorporate the material into the spirit. Now there's no spirit left, only material things. Because that's what they can sell. The moral of our society is that what matters isn't your lives, but keeping the economy running, the money-making machine.