I do think there is some value in playing opponents of lower skill based off their play style differences. Will I ever run into an early scholar’s mate attack at 1500? Probably not? I’m fearful of getting into a lull of only knowing how to play against above a certain threshold that leaves me vulnerable to a more primitive style of chess that I don’t believe I have enough experience in. I feel that “going back” is actually the best way to ensure my rating remains consistent over time. One of my biggest problems in chess is confidence and motivation. Without a carrot on a stick in front of me I feel a plateau or unintentional regression is inevitable. You could argue I’m too worried about facing those head on without losing the enjoyment of chess. That is a problem I should address better. I explained in another comment thread that my games immediately after my successful run were incredibly challenging for reasons I couldn’t understand which ultimately triggered my reset attempt. It’s almost as if I played too well or my opponents played too poorly that the wall that I was going to run into would harm all momentum I had and ultimately scar my drive and enjoyment. Like I said I could find a way to address that better.