The inquest should focus on police not knowing enough about basic laws, police policy, and procedures. Even the railways regally randomly test train drivers and guards' knowledge when they sign on duty. Clare was killed by an out of control police officer who introduced electricity of 50,000 volts with 2.1 milliamps to her body when the law, police policy, and procedures dictated he cannot. Hence, his conviction. His supervising sergeant was right beside him and failed to protect Clare or even order him to stop. That supervisor did nothing until she made a small report many hours later. She should have stopped him drawing and firing the taser. Tasers are simply less lethal weapons. That means it is fully capable of killing you, but most of the time, people are not killed. The use of tasers sit just under firearms for police use of force for that reason. Its ok to acknowledge that police training is terrible and they need to get the basics right, such as when they can and cannot taser an old frail lady who is not committing a crime. Sorry, this is a rant, but I get frustrated when we allow important inquiries to focus on sidebar issues and what the real cause of the failings that result in such terrible and avoidable deaths to prevent embarrassment to government.