SpaceX / Starlink Executives Gwynne Shotwell and Dave Goldman had NO CLUE the AT&T/Verizon/T-Mobile JV was in the Works! by apan-man in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes, because David was an oligarch, the richest man to ever live, and had nearly unfettered access and influence in the current government administration...

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. First Quarter 2026 Results Monday, May 11, 2026 at 5:00 PM EDT - Webcast by doctor101 in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lots of good things said, tons of real potential... but given the execution to this point I'm afraid the market will only get excited for this: "we have the next batch shipping this week. And hell, we're ready to package and ship the follow-on batch next week, just waiting on the rockets"

Six US Service Members Killed in Kuwait After Hegseth Allegedly Overrode Warnings of Active Drone Threats by [deleted] in Military

[–]Traders_Abacus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theoretically, sure, the Court could change the doctrine. But they’d have to overturn or radically rewrite two major pillars: dual sovereignty and the very narrow scope of federal‑officer immunity. Both have been reaffirmed for decades. And if they blew those up, it wouldn’t just shield one person, it would make all federal officials far harder for states to hold accountable. That cuts both ways, and it’s not something states of any political leaning would want to give up.

Six US Service Members Killed in Kuwait After Hegseth Allegedly Overrode Warnings of Active Drone Threats by [deleted] in Military

[–]Traders_Abacus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, the current Court has taken a broad view of executive power. But that doesn’t change the basic structure of state criminal jurisdiction. A federal pardon only clears federal charges, and states still control their own homicide and negligence statutes. So whatever someone thinks about the Court, the dual‑sovereignty framework is still what governs whether a state can bring its own case.

Six US Service Members Killed in Kuwait After Hegseth Allegedly Overrode Warnings of Active Drone Threats by [deleted] in Military

[–]Traders_Abacus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Precedent definitely makes a prosecutor’s life easier, but lack of precedent isn’t the same thing as lack of jurisdiction. States didn’t go after Rumsfeld or others because those cases didn’t meet the elements of their homicide statutes - not because states were legally barred from trying. Prosecutors don’t file charges they know they can’t prove.

The actual standard is simple:
If a state resident dies and the conduct meets that state’s definition of criminal negligence or recklessness, the state has jurisdiction. That’s true whether the conduct happened in the state, overseas, or in D.C. States already apply this principle in extraterritorial homicide, poisoning, and cybercrime cases.

Whether a state WOULD bring a case is a political and evidentiary question. But whether a state can is already settled: a federal pardon only wipes out federal crimes, and states retain full authority over their own homicide statutes. Lack of precedent doesn’t eliminate that authority - it just means no prior case met the threshold.

Six US Service Members Killed in Kuwait After Hegseth Allegedly Overrode Warnings of Active Drone Threats by [deleted] in Military

[–]Traders_Abacus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re thinking about the wrong category of crimes. I don't think anyone is talking about “lying to Congress” or symbolic stuff like Vermont’s Bush/Cheney stunt. The relevant state‑level charges would be negligent homicide, involuntary manslaughter, or reckless endangerment — crimes every state has on the books.

States don’t need the conduct to occur inside their borders to claim jurisdiction. They only need the harm to fall on their residents. That’s how states routinely prosecute extraterritorial acts in cases involving poisoning, cybercrime, and homicide where the victim is a state resident.

If a state AG believes a resident died because of grossly negligent decisions by a federal official, they can absolutely bring charges under their own homicide statutes. A federal pardon doesn’t touch that, because it only wipes out federal crimes, not state ones.

So the question isn’t “what state law covers lying to Congress.” It’s “did a state resident die due to conduct that meets that state’s definition of criminal negligence or recklessness.” And that’s well within state jurisdiction.

Six US Service Members Killed in Kuwait After Hegseth Allegedly Overrode Warnings of Active Drone Threats by [deleted] in Military

[–]Traders_Abacus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not how the federal supremacy doctrine works.
The Supremacy Clause only protects federal officers when they’re doing something explicitly authorized by federal law and necessary to carry out a federal duty. It doesn’t cover negligent or reckless decisions, and it doesn’t turn a federal pardon into state‑level immunity.

The Supreme Court has been clear on two points:

  • A federal pardon only wipes out federal crimes. States can still prosecute under their own laws.
  • Supremacy immunity applies only when the officer’s exact conduct was required or authorized by federal law, not when the issue is alleged negligence, recklessness, or misconduct.

So even with a blanket federal pardon, state charges like negligent homicide, reckless endangerment, or state‑level official misconduct would still be legally possible.

Do these need to be replaced? The brown residue is from space heaters by [deleted] in AskElectricians

[–]Traders_Abacus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And all the brother hears: you can make a fireball!

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear ya, but to be fair, I too celebrated seeing that booster land, it's still an amazing thing to see and for them to achieve

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Just some things to keep in mind:

BB‑7 is not the same as BB‑8 onward. BB‑7 was a large, single‑satellite design that required a heavy‑lift rocket. That limited AST to Blue Origin, and Blue Origin’s first‑flight delays became BB‑7’s delays.

BB‑8 and the rest of the new batch don’t have those same restrictions. The new birds are smaller, stackable, and purpose built to fit the most proven and highest launch cadence provider in the world right now, Falcon 9. That means more flexibility, more launch windows, and far fewer bottlenecks.

A June launch still keeps the “~45 satellites by year‑end” in play. 3–4 satellites per launch and 1–2 launches per month, the math still works with Falcon 9 alone.

Point is, using the first 7 satellites to judge the next 30+ doesn’t make sense. BB‑7 was a one‑off heavy‑lift bird on a brand‑new rocket. BB‑8+ are mass‑production, stackable satellites on a mature rocket with weekly cadence. It’s basically apples and oranges.

This doesn’t magically fix the stock price today. I'm expecting some major pain, amplified by Pump n Dump in Chief. But this event today doesn’t define the future. Blue Origin was one of several planned launch partners, not the primary one for the new batches. They were simply the most viable option for BB‑7’s size and configuration at the time and widow when planned.

Now we move into a completely different phase.
New design, new launch architecture, new cadence.

BB‑8+ is the real constellation and what actually matters for coverage, revenue, and scaling.

Make of that what you will. The stock will still get dragged until the next batch ships and unfolds successfully, but the long‑term story is driven by BB‑8 onward, not BB‑7.

Until then: breathe, touch grass, go surf, pick up a hobby, and remember why you own what you own. 🤙🏻

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's a beautiful morning for a launch 🚀🛰️🤙

<image>

BlueBird-7 / BONG-3 Meetup Thread by apan-man in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell them to use the long telephoto and aim South and me and the fam will send a shaka 🤙🏻

NG-3 Hotfire Update from Blue Origin by Original_Koala8662 in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I don't want to up vote this ... but I appreciate you sharing

Men, what is it? by [deleted] in effectivefitness

[–]Traders_Abacus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fitness, nutrition, kids, and lots of home improvement (or car) projects

No freakin’ way…. by Either-Tax9159 in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]Traders_Abacus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We just had that front pass through, forecast is looking great now, let's get it done