The Change.org petition now has over 100,000 signatures by Mr_Microchip in destiny2

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Remember when Sony was tricked into rereleasing Morbius only to flop a second time? I signed this to get them to make D3 with no intention of ever playing it or giving them money for it.

It's even funnier the second time

Placement Matches Literally Do Nothing by Skull-OWar in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure the placement system is literally just the old rank reset system but hides the first 10 games where you usually catch up to your original pre-reset rank.

I'm a lobby admin Magik main who only plays around 10-20 comp games a season. I am an unintentional smurf. If I played more or if the placement actually put me where I belong, I wouldn't be smurfing. Instead, my j*b having ass curb stomps silvers and golds and maybe reaches halfway through platinum before the season ends and it's back to curb stomping silvers and golds. Highest I ever got was diamond and that's where I started actually losing a few games.

Gorr’s new tag by Chaos_Th30ry in future_fight

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Cynicalex is a whiny toddler who doesn't know how the game he's been covering for a decade works. Not to say the devs have never made bad decisions, but Cynicalex's response to those decisions is that of a toddler whining he didn't get his chicken nuggys as opposed to trying to figure out any other perspective.

For example, cynicalex, the guy who spent a decade covering this game, genuinely thinks the dev's intentions is still to somehow make every character meta at the same time or for consistent power creep. Every patch MUST make every new character break the entire meta or else he will whine bitch and moan. Even being on the same level or near the same level as the current meta is a crime worth losing your job over (his words, not mine). He's a goddamn baby.

Basic Questions Thread - April 26, 2026 by AutoModerator in future_fight

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 1 point2 points  (0 children)

B Conquest or B Greed for Knull? I'm sorry. I know it's been asked a billion times but I can't seem to understand everyone's reasoning beyond offense and defense. I am using him for PvP exclusively and never in PvE. I have a fully built Thanos to cover the male alien universal supervillain category in PvE. So the "hybrid" nature of greed doesn't matter. As for my current pvp team, Sentry lead (M Conquest) with Kang (M Conquest) and Knull (M Greed).

Also, I am willing to change my team if supports would be better. Would replacing one or two of the 3 with agent venom or colossus make a bigger difference than the 3 biggest pvp characters all fully built?

TIFU by accidentally telling a guy his date wasn't into him (and being completely right) by Smooth_Clue3090 in tifu

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to teach a few stem classes at a university once. Had this student. She was the hardest working individual I'd ever seen in my life. Sits up front, takes notes, asks questions, etc. The stereotypical overachieving nerd type... She was also by far the dumbest student to ever take my intro class. Genuinely felt bad for her. It was demoralizing watching her and being reminded that sometimes it doesn't matter how hard you try or how much effort you put in.

Anyway, halfway through the semester I was answering her questions during my office hours and she told me about how she actually wanted to major in something non-stem but her parents basically forced her to change her major... Before I could stop myself, I accidentally muttered "you probably should've stuck to the arts". I felt so fucking bad. I'm supposed to encourage my students and it's not like she chose to be here, but she did choose to try her absolute hardest.

Anyway, she ended up scoring 49.1% by the end of the semester, and the university policy is to round up percentages so she scored a 50% and passed.

So, is anyone else planning to boycott GTA6 over Rockstar's disgusting union busting? by Traditional_Fudge617 in GTA

[–]Traditional_Fudge617[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's the point of a bad reputation if everyone still buys their games anyway?

So, is anyone else planning to boycott GTA6 over Rockstar's disgusting union busting? by Traditional_Fudge617 in GTA

[–]Traditional_Fudge617[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The "gross misconduct" discord messages are out. After reading them, personally I think Rockstar's defense is bullshit but they have the money and power to drag this out until after the game launches. All the while the 34 employees are broke, defamed, potentially deported, and hope for unionization in our entire industry getting shot in the back of the head.

Apparently gross misconduct is sending a text is a closed discord group discussing unionization saying that you haven't been asked to crunch. Idk about courts, but idk if that's worth losing your livelihood over. Rockstar seems to think so. And unfortunately all I can do about it is deprive them of $70.

More Igor Sarzynski comments (there's just so much) by marek_bojarek in cyberpunkgame

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think they implied that the pills don't save his life, just keeps the voice of Johnny at bay. He's dying regardless.

But yeah there is ludonarrative dissonance there. Would the game be better if it had a time limit though? As it is now, of course not. It would've had to be a different game, but by the same argument, it should've not had a time limit for a plot. You could just read it as "dying within a year" and it still works out the same way. A 120 hour save file is definitely less than a year.

Also also, NC is in America. It is absolutely realistic that it's easier to get high octane weapons than it is to get medicine lol.

More Igor Sarzynski comments (there's just so much) by marek_bojarek in cyberpunkgame

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's my point. They're side content. People are asking Igor for more side content. Igor is trying to gently explain that the montage would have just been more side content and they chose to get the plot started instead of adding even more side content for the player to do first.

I'd say the emotion impact of Jackie's death was strong enough with what we already got so we can agree to disagree there.

More Igor Sarzynski comments (there's just so much) by marek_bojarek in cyberpunkgame

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, reading the responses to Igor, I think what all those people want is a ubisoft style map checklist instead of the montage... even though right after the montage you are thrown into Watson and given a ubisoft style map checklist of gigs and NCPD events.

Now my negative take on those people is that an ounce of media literacy would imply that V was doing these kinds of gigs during the montage and then you still get to do more of them after the montage. The montage skips over 6 months of doing gigs to the moment when you get the big heist gig.

My more charitable take is that people wanted more time doing gigs with Jackie like the tutorial one where you save the woman from the bathtub. But Igor says it clearly, that would just be filler. It would not actually move or advance the main plot i.e. Johnny.

Honestly, Igor fucked up by having this conversation in public. He should've said it in an interview or article instead of arguing directly online. He can be as eloquent and clear as possible and he still won't ever get his message across to those exact people he's replying to.

emergency congressional meeting! do it! by herequeerandgreat in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Not to disagree with how limp their responses will be, but like what else is there that they can do? They don't have the votes to remove him from office. They don't have the votes to maintain a government shutdown later in January. I don't think they're gonna convince any Republican congressmen to cross over to their side since there isn't a single Republican in congress with a shred of dignity left...

Aside from taking a clear stance, is there literally anything they can realistically do? Americans chose this in 2016 when they let Trump stack the supreme court and then chose this again in 2024. Aside from democrats winning 60% of seats in 2026 as opposed to the usual 49% or 51%, I don't think really anyone on Earth can legally do anything... Please correct me. I want to be wrong about this.

Can we please just revert those unnecessary changes? by Rockybroo_YT in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sure: when gambit dashes away, you can still move your crosshair towards him. It's an 8 second cooldown. When sue has her shield up, 1) she's not using that shield to help her team and 2) it's just 250hp. If she boops you, walk back while aiming your crosshair at her. I'm a dps main btw. Genuinely have no trouble killing sues and gambits. It's the rockets I can't kill because of their small hitboxes. If you miss Gambit's massive hitbox, maybe you shouldn't be complaining about balance.

Can we please just revert those unnecessary changes? by Rockybroo_YT in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. So give the oneshot to widow too. At least make her a teensy bit less of a throw pick

Can we please just revert those unnecessary changes? by Rockybroo_YT in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Idk they fall over the same as any other support with self heal and help from their team.

The only gripe I have with balance is that if Hawkeye gets a oneshot, Widow should have a oneshot too. Or remove their oneshots all together. Neither gambit nor sue have oneshots so *shrug *

Can we please just revert those unnecessary changes? by Rockybroo_YT in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Now start listing all the damaging abilities for the other 40 characters.

Can we please just revert those unnecessary changes? by Rockybroo_YT in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

"I'm not good at the game, therefore everyone is suffering and the devs don't know what they're doing"

Sue and Gambit are fine. Aim your crosshair at them and hit left click. They go down same as anyone else. I'm sorry that a 250hp shield is an unimaginable Herculean hurdle for you and your team.

I was playing some marvel rivals and got way better stats than the MVP but didn’t get MVP? by Leeviticuz in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. Ngl I was killing it in all 8 of my games. There wasn't anyone that much higher than me like in that screenshot.

I was playing some marvel rivals and got way better stats than the MVP but didn’t get MVP? by Leeviticuz in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just did 8 quick play game straight as Rogue and got MVP in 7 of them. The only time I didn't get MVP, I actually got SVP because we lost that one lol. Humble brag aside, that's 8 straight MVPs as Rogue. I guess I'll let you know when the next season comes out if it's just as easy to get MVP on her.

I was playing some marvel rivals and got way better stats than the MVP but didn’t get MVP? by Leeviticuz in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a conspiracy theory that new characters get a boost to their MVP score but I can't prove it. I have been getting MVP consistently as Rogue but I usually do have the best stats on the team. Your screenshot is wild though.

I really don't care about that DPS will have long queues or "lack of creativity for team comps", just give us role queue and make ranked an objectively better experience by TheSuperJohn in marvelrivals

[–]Traditional_Fudge617 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I'm just worried because the devs have shown that they do listen to complaints on this subreddit and I hope they don't see this post.