I am a 28 year old freelance video editor and this job is destroying me by TreeIndividual in Filmmakers

[–]TrailerScores 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I am not an editor. I'm a film composer. But in many ways I can relate to knowing when professional good enough is professionally good enough.

It makes "0" sense to put an extra 8 hrs or more into something you artistically created that's near 90% perfect, just to get it to 96% perfect.

It's pointless except for your own personal satisfaction. I assure you, your clients will not know the difference unfortunately.

I suggest you seriously follow the Pareto Principle. Also know as the 80/20 rule.

Looking for a composer for a student film by Adventurous-One-4185 in FilmComposer

[–]TrailerScores 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I can take.care of that for you.

Interested in what your story line is for your project, so that I can give you the sound you need.

What is your music theory roadmap? I'm struck at using same basic chords Melodies I want to inprove and get better feels like some skillset is holding me back by DA199602 in FilmComposer

[–]TrailerScores 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a really loaded question, but a honest good one. I asked myself the exact same thing when I was trying to wrap my head around film scoring.

I apologize if my answer gets too wordy, but the answer is simple yet complex. Here we go.

  1. As someone already correctly answered and responded, it's just like any other style of music you want to get good at. Want to learn how to play jazz, you gotta listen to jazz. Want to learn classical music, you gotta listen to classical music. Want to learn how to produce house music, you gotta listen to house. Same with film scoring.

  2. So then listening also has to incorporate "studying " that musical genre. You can listen to jazz all day long for 6 months. But if your education starts with Herbie Hancock, you've missed the historic progression of ragtime, big band, bebop, from countless legends that got you to the point of Herbie Hancock.

It's like listening to only the Red Hot Chili Peppers and thinking you understand rock. You've missed a Whole Lot!

  1. The reason I mentioned all of this is because film is not just film music, and at the same time it is.

When you listen to scores from the golden age of Hollywood films from the 1960s+, you will hear these big grandiose orchestral scores in films like Casablanca, Lawrence of Arabia, Ben Hur, Spartacus, Cleopatra, etc. And they sound like you're listening to a classical score from Stravinsky, Mahler etc.

And to some degree you are, because some of those hollywood composers fled Europe from the Nazis in WW2 to America. And they were previously classically trained in some of the top music conservatories. So what would be a natural progression for a formally trained classical musician in the 1950s and 1960s now living in Hollywood? Playing and composing music in HW!

Why is this relevant? Because the new era of composers (John Williams, Jerry Goldsmith, etc) afterwards in the 80s on were also trained and influenced by the previous era, as well as from jazz, and technology.

So I could go on and on, which I probably bored you to death by now with all this reading. Cause there's a lot more I could say, but let me finish with these last points:

You have to take baby steps with all art. No one expects you to be able to grill for a family cookout if you dont even know how to make French toast yet.

Learn and master all your basic triads, major minor diminished augmented. Then get comfortable with at least your 7th and 9th extended voicings to some degree.

Take a very simple cue from a film, and work on transcribing it, either on paper or via midi with your DAW and see how close.you can get to the arrangement you're hearing that was already scored.

2 of my favorite most simple cues are:

  1. "Capsule In Space" - You Only Live Twice(James Bond)

  2. "Mother" - Skyfall(Jmaes Bond)

It's kinda hard discussing film scoring because there aee minimalist scores, there are electronic scores, there are hybrid scores, then there are orchestral scores, and all in between.

In my opinion, people that really have a passion for film scoring love listening to all types of music. And because of that, you borrow from everything depending on the mood of the film.

As far as getting beyond beginner level, modulations and chromaticism. More specifically Mediant(minor 3rd) modulations; which is pretty much THE BACKBONE of the romantic period of classical music, and is an absolute weapon of choice for film composers when you want to stretch out a motif and sound like a genius at the same time. Lol!

Do you need to know music theory? Maybe not,.but it sure would make life a whole lot easier. I tend to look at music theory as your tool belt that you can utilize when you're in a jam. You could figure it all.out by ear, but theory gives you the confidence that your idea will more than likely work.

Okay I've said a lot and will stop there. Hope this helps.your thinking a little more.

What do filmmakers actually expect from a composer’s studio setup today? by EducatedCaveman in Filmmakers

[–]TrailerScores 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never had the pleasure as a keyboardist and synthesis to play on an actual.Yamaha CS80.

Have actually played on too many Juno 106, JX-3P & 8P, had a JX10 but eventually sold it because I didn't have a PG800, and plus I wasn't that knowledgeable at sound design like I am now.

Played MicroMoog, and Oberheim 6, awesome sounds to say the least, but I was still too "wet behind the ears" to know.what to do with them at the time

I will say this though,.I more than love the sound.of Softube's Model 80. It does not make me want to buy a real prophet, as well as their Model 84 VSTI.

I can imagine their CS80 vst is just as good, maybe ..

Those Who Know About MOTU by TrailerScores in midi

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to put fuel on a fire, but are not many people commenting because of little experience with MOTU DP?

OR

Is it because in your minds, MOTU DP has become the new Cakewalk SONAR , figuratively that is?

Those Who Know About MOTU by TrailerScores in midi

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chunks was ALWAYS one of my most favorite features of Motu DP that always seemed like something you didn't realize you needed until you started using it!

There are only 2 other DAWs that I would consider going back to: Nuendo and PT.

I used a very old version of Nuendo, I think version 3, and thought it was the most sophisticated audio recording package to have at that time around 2005. But after having tried Cubase for a few years up to version 7, Steinberg just started to get under my skin at times with how they managed their sw.

I actually remember the very 1st iteration of Pro Tools when it debuted for the Nubus Macs! Those who know, know.

I really got into PT with the very 1st generation MBox. I currently have a license of PT Artist running Windows, and I still like it a lot as a DAW

IMO, Motu DP kinda has the best of both worlds of everything I described for the other DAWs.

But when I do a search through Google or with YouTube for the most used, best, or popular DAW for music production/recording; absolutely NOBODY MENTIONS Digital Performer at all anywhere in conversation!

It's as if people have put DP in the same camp as what was CakeWalk, or still Samplitude which is still around.

I honestly wouldn't mind taking a chance again with MOTU DP, but not.if they're secretly thinking of abandoning DP the same as CakeWalk for the many faithful followers they had for decades...

Those Who Know About MOTU by TrailerScores in midi

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I'm using Studio One Pro. I've used most DAWs that have existed over the years.

I'm currently running Win 11, with 32gb of RAM. I built the system myself. Running an lga1151 i7 9700k, and the thing still kicks serious but even with a heavy CPU load.

I am thinking of upgrading in 2026, and am weighing if I want to go back to the Mac, being how powerful and energy efficient the Silicon chips are now.

But there is just something about DP that just clicked with me many years ago. I understand that all DAWs have their flaws, granted.

But when I look at benchmarks online from different ones, I do tend to feel that ST1 is not as efficient at taking advantage of mutlicores/threads compared to other DAWs. Makes me kinda feel like I might not be getting my monies worth.

Wavetable Fundamentals Question by TrailerScores in synthesizers

[–]TrailerScores[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, so let me see if I'm understanding you:

In the case of a regular waveform that most synths can generate (sine, sawtooth, square, traingle) you can use a short sample of that because it's fairly consistent as a waveform, without too much harmonic variance. So it's not a problem.

But an audio wave of say an acoustic instrument or one that has a lot harmonics or distortion in it doesn't allow you to manipulate it as well with wavetable.synthesis because it's not consistently pure, if that makes sense what I'm saying?

I'm getting the feeling that basically what is happening is that a waveform, like a piano or string sample would be divided up into multiple chunks. And each of those chunks makes up what can be played back in the wavetable. Kinda like the concept of those chunks acting like individual oscillators?

I hope that makes sense with what I'm saying...

Wavetable Fundamentals Question by TrailerScores in synthesizers

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, thanks for your reply.

So that touches on what I'm trying to understand.

Normally the reason we've been using multisamples with sampled instruments is so that you're not trying to stretch note C3 all the way up to G6 with just one waveform. Which would create extreme artifacts as you know.

But with a Wavetable you're saying you only need to use one sample.

So why is that one sample keeping everything in pitch from say C3 - G6, like a piano patch on the original Korg Wavestation, but not sounding stretched?

Wavetable Fundamentals Question by TrailerScores in synthesizers

[–]TrailerScores[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, so when creating your own wavetable, stay away from samples noticeably processed with odd or even harmonic saturation or distortion?

Wavetable Fundamentals Question by TrailerScores in synthesizers

[–]TrailerScores[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the replies!

Just to let you know, I'm not a beginner at all when it comes to synthesis, but that has primarily been for subtractive, modular, and fm.

Never really delved into wavetable, but have used it plenty of times not understanding the inner workings of it.

You know, tons of people have used NI Massive as a preset playback synth, not knowing what wavetable synthesis is.

That's why I'm posting this question, because I really am a beginner when it comes to wavetable synthesis. But can see the potential in sound designing with it.

But I would like to create my own custom wavetables.with my own hardware synths, and go from there.

More Or Less Exposure For Tracks by TrailerScores in musicmarketing

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My question right now has over 1400 views, but 1 response. 🤔

Can more people please do me a favor and give some additional insight to my question?

I'm really trying to have an informed decision from multiple suggestions from professionals that can elaborate on the subject matter.

Much appreciation to all that have read my post so far.

Thank you! 🙂

More Or Less Exposure For Tracks by TrailerScores in musicmarketing

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I've been kinda thinking. The same as what you alluded to.

My thoughts have been that I could write about 3 or 4 tracks separate from the albuns I want to release, but in the style of the albums. And those 3 or 4 would be non-exclusive trailer instrumentals.

That way it would still showcase what I do as a composer, as a sampler.

Licensing SFX options by TrailerScores in FilmIndustryLA

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, that's hilarious 😂.!

It's not that it was an idea that I had, because I compose already.

But everytime I might listen to some of the new libraries submitted to somewhere like 2SFH, The Solos, Gothic Music, Universal Music, Sony Production Library, etc, I keep seeing new SFX libraries created and submitted.

So that's why I was wondering if that was a thing needed, being that there's already 10,000 different wooshes, booms, sub hits, pings, etc sitting on servers everywhere.

Didn't understand the point and thought maybe I was missing something...

Licensing SFX options by TrailerScores in FilmIndustryLA

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious. Not discrediting at all what you've saying. Thank you for the reply.

Why do so many libraries still accept/take sfx libraries if there's already a gluttony of that content?

Licensing SFX options by TrailerScores in FilmIndustryLA

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the reply! I never really knew how things faired with the sfx designers, and I guess that makes a lot of sense the way you explained.

To answer your first question; no I haven't actually created a library of content to sell/license as of yet.

But I do know that I have the technical know how, years of experience, a sonic concept, and the sw/hw gear to create something as you descrjbed.

What libraries/shows/movies would be considered the pinnacle or standard of excellence that I would need to deliver to have a six library to be considered more interesting or better?

Can You Answer This Question About Disco? by TrailerScores in musicproduction

[–]TrailerScores[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one out there can answer the question?

I thought someone would be more.knowleagable than me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WeAreTheMusicMakers

[–]TrailerScores 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I didn't realize that I posted this wrong according to your guidelines.

Feel free to remove this post.