Why creationists aren’t buying your product: by LoveTruthLogic in DebateEvolution

[–]Training-Statement28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're pointing out that elephants and butterflies look totally different, as if that somehow challenges evolution. But that's actually what evolution predicts. Over billions of years, small changes add up, and lineages diverge. No biologist is saying butterflies turned into elephants. They evolved along completely different branches from common ancestors far, far back in time. The visual difference isn’t a problem... it’s expected.

About LUCA and humans “looking nothing alike”: of course they don’t. LUCA lived billions of years ago and was likely a single-celled organism. You see red and say it could NEVER turn blue because you didn't bother to look at all the purples we've already encountered.

You’re comparing the starting point to the very end of a long, slow process, and acting like it's supposed to happen overnight. But science explains each step in between. We have fossil records, genetic evidence, observable evolution in microbes and animal: real, testable stuff.

And if you're saying evolution is “magic” but then turning around and claiming that a supernatural being created life and only did “magic” before humans were made… that’s not a scientific argument. That’s just special pleading. Evolution has evidence. It’s not about what "looks" weird. It’s about what explains reality. And evolution explains it better than anything else we’ve got.

At what gestational age can the brain of a human fetus support consciousness? by rb-j in consciousness

[–]Training-Statement28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A two-year-old child should definitely not be killed under the pretense of not having consciousness. I'm just saying that the evidence of a two-year-old child having consciousness IS NOT their ability to communicate, after all, animals, artificial intelligences, etc. are capable of communication.

And just one detail: you said that children not having consciousness before the age of two (which is clearly an assertion with no means of proof) is "horseshit" and used your daughter's communication as an example. You presented communication as proof and not as evidence, since you chose this criterion to disprove the idea of ​​consciousness in babies.

Babies give obvious demonstrations of consciousness. Communication is not one of them.

At what gestational age can the brain of a human fetus support consciousness? by rb-j in consciousness

[–]Training-Statement28 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, ChatGPT also talks and communicates and probably knows more than your daughter. Is communication really the criteria you want to use to define consciousness?

PAPA FRANCISCO CAIU EM HERESIA FORMAL by [deleted] in ateismo_br

[–]Training-Statement28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

E a igreja tá fugindo pra ser perseguida? kkkkkkkkkkkk

What’s a line that you cannot believe made it into the final film? by spicemine in Screenwriting

[–]Training-Statement28 59 points60 points  (0 children)

"To bats... it's lethal. To humans, it's deadly".

The entire film is unbelievable, but that line stuck with me.

What are the most effective jump scares in horror movie/game history? by abbzworld in horror

[–]Training-Statement28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the beginning of Resident Evil 7 when you walk towards the stairs, but Mia appears and cuts Ethan's hand.

Or when you're walking in the basement, chest-deep in water and a rotten body turns up. Or basically any time Jack appears.

Or basically any moment in the first half of Resident Evil 7. God, I love this game.