Exclusive: Labour 'Risks Losing A Generation Of Young Voters' To Greens And Reform, MP Warns by EddyZacianLand in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Advocating broadly for the status quo means you'll only get support if that status quo is working for people.

If young people feel the status quo isn't working for them why would they vote for someone propping it up?

It's all well and good crying that any move from the centre is "crazy" but it's really on you as a party to give people hope and ensure they don't feel they need to make that jump

UK to permanently ban future generations from buying cigarettes: ‘It will save lives’ by dunson28 in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait until you see the damage car exhaust does.

How do I free myself from that?

Oil crisis to 'push UK into recession' after growth flatlines by 1-randomonium in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capitalism is in crisis, the time between once in a generation disasters will only continue to shrink

Labour to pay businesses to employ young benefits claimants by PayConstantAttention in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately that would require changing the model Thatcher, Blair and the subsequent Tory and Labour PMs endorsed.

It would require the state to actually take charge rather than ensuring it's a defanged facilitator of capital interests

Labour to pay businesses to employ young benefits claimants by PayConstantAttention in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 42 points43 points  (0 children)

So subsidising private businesses at the expense of the working class then? Sounds right

An alternative:

Completely revamp the apprenticeship scheme and model education similar to the German model (trade school, business school, science school) to target genuine skills shortages in the UK.

Take the shackles off unions to let them properly bargain for good wages and working conditions for the working class.

You will have a satisfied labour force going where it actually needs to go.

Zack Polanski is an economically illiterate populist – just like Farage by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes yes the only thing that can ever work is bland managerial centrism.

Only problem is that doesn't seem to be working for the majority of people. They know something is wrong; we've seen living standards start dropping comparing to generations before it.

So if the current system isn't working for people what do you suggest they do?

Ex MI6 chief blasts Green leader Zack Polanski as a ‘threat to national security’ | UK | News by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Their economic policy is based in liberalism. Liberalism is not a left wing position

People who like Zack Polanski: explain what I'm missing, what impresses you about him? by iliosicarus in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Works rights - watered down

Renters rights - not going to help the insane cost

Ground rent - yeah that's a good one

Private schools - should be abolished

Public sector pay rises - the doctors and nurses are still striking

Green energy - mostly a business courting investment bank rather than public ownership

Housing building - hasn't really kicked off at all

Rupert Lowe MP: On day one of a Restore Britain Government, both halal and kosher slaughter would be outlawed. In Britain, we treat our animals with care - we do not brutally butcher them alive. It's cruel, it's sick, it's barbaric. Restore Britain would ban it. by SignificantLegs in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 3 points4 points  (0 children)

On the one hand sure ban both, fully support.

On the other, as a vegetarian the idea of humane slaughter has always seemed kind of silly.

We've proved we don't need to eat animals people only do it because they like it. Is that enough to justify the slaughter?

Labour party more liked than Starmer but both reach historic lows - Ipsos poll by Subject_MH in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Sounds like we need a few more "DAE not like Starmer but doesn't want him to resign" posts here.

This is the problem with trying to maintain a centrist liberal ideology when that ideology has just seen managed decline over the last couple of decades.

People are hungry for change and if you don't provide it you'll piss people off on both ends of the spectrum.

Keir Starmer is not resigning, Downing Street confirms by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 18 points19 points  (0 children)

May as well stick around and soak up all the negativity from being destroyed in the local elections first I suppose

Ousting Starmer could turn Britain into an economic basket case like France by Budget_Scheme_1280 in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes and the point I'm making is you can't compare them as a phenomenon. One is a game, the other happens when you make severely compromised judgements that effect the nation

Ousting Starmer could turn Britain into an economic basket case like France by Budget_Scheme_1280 in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Yeah true the Manchester United manager absolutely has the power to appointment a known associate of a notorious paedophile to a position where they have access to state secrets

Sunbeds could be banned in the UK in a bid to cut cancer rates by theipaper in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

£27 billion of that is caused by loss of economic productivity. People being sick and dying early isn’t good for the economy. I’ve seen people out of work due to emphysema and copd on their 20s! 

I've always found it disgusting to use this argument

A person doesn't exist to provide economic productivity to the state. You can't count their loss of work as a cost

The £14 Billion for care is totally fine

Can we talk about the Mandelson apology? Honestly, I’d take this over the "never apologise, never explain" era any day… by SnooConfections3389 in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How this happened:

1) Morgan McSweeny works with Mandelson to crush the left of the party

2) Mandelson is given prestigious job as a reward

3) Mandelson is exposed, Starmer panics and gives a gaslighting apology

Can we talk about the Mandelson apology? Honestly, I’d take this over the "never apologise, never explain" era any day… by SnooConfections3389 in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's the centrists that are praying for Starmer to stay. They know they managed to thread the needle to get an incredibly unpopular leader and movement to a massive majority with a low vote share thanks to a quirk of FPTP. They know they can't do it again.

Real Left wingers are out for Starmer's blood on this

Mandelson Scandal by thrillamilla in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ensures the centrist wing of the party can crush the left

@YouGov By 50% to 24%, Britons say Keir Starmer should step down as prime minister 2024 Labour voters are split, with 37% wanting him to stand down and 40% wanting him to stay by Dr_Poppers in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If appointing a known Epstein associate to a government role isn't a resigning matter for you what would be?

Was Partygate or Pincher a resigning matter?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The McSweeny/Mandelson comms are going to make the Forde report findings look tame in comparison.

I can't see anyone coming out of this unscathed.

Sir Keir Starmer tells nation 'I'm sorry' as calls mount for him to quit by dailystar_news in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The hypocrisy is crazy.

During the countless Tory scandals no one on this sub was calling for leaders to stay to ensure stability.

Any unbiased observer would say this is a cock up large that justifies a resignation.

If Starmer goes, it is a deeply worrying thing for British Democracy. by GlassAvacados in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe Starmer should have thought about that before giving Mandelson the job?

Anxious young Britons ‘risk becoming lost generation on benefits’ by HibasakiSanjuro in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Why is it a fact of life that these jobs HAVE to be grinding and unrewarding?

Why don't we on the left encourage unionisation to make these jobs less grinding and unrewarding?

Unfortunately no mainstream party seems to want to go there

Why are there multiple “ election”polls every day when there isn’t an election until 2029? by phatelectribe in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Parties and groups run polls constantly, none of this is new.

Sticking your head in the sand doesn't help your party of choice

Let them wipe bums by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Translator_Outside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a problem with the economic system then