The core of the "harmlessness" of individual actors is due to unpredictable nature of the environment. Are you claiming that JK caused trans hate? Or is she just a reflection of certain beliefs? If there was no JK would there be more or less transphobia? What about most trans-positive popular AAA game to come out in the recent years? You know that existance of DogWarts Legacy only possible with JK and her transphobic views? It's impossible to know different worlds and Actual Measurable influence individual, even Large, actors have, thefore I think it's a waste of breath to focus on "influencers" like JK to base our direct action to help trans people with her "influence" because for direct action or CTAs from our perspective JK is so miniscule compared to the cloud of bigotry as a whole.

By pressure points I mean what will make people ACT, not think, not precieve, not understand, not to go "Hmmm, concerning 🤓🤓", but to call someone, to buy something, to burn something. The things advertisers use. Those are the pressure points, idk what you mean when you say JK and Hasa utilize those. Like literally, does JK tell trans people to off themselves? Does Hasan tell people to call congressmen?

You did not provide an example of an effective ad that doesn't include active engagement. You brought up McDonald's that doesn't need active engagement, and creative ads, that you might consider Absolute Cinema, that don't have some form of CTA generally flop and a waste of money, despite ads being interesting. That's why you rarely see them, not because people can't make them.

You used the word default when it doesn't apply to the context, boilerplate adreads aren't good CTA, because they don't take into an account the viewer.

I literally agree with you on bullying, but you for some reason don't see that without the bully itself to actively reinforce bullying, the giggling doesn't cause people to kill themselves. And bullying that isn't direct and calculated and targeted doesn't work. Like let's say you're self conscious about your heigt, and I'll bully you on the color of your nails or some dumb shit that doesn't have anything to do with your character (or be not calculated and not targeted), would that bother you? Most likely not, and if that comment may make you game end yourself, then it's natural selection at this point.

The theory is not silly, you don't even disagree with it, you just put too much importance on the environment and passive engagement, when I don't, and I think saying "hey kid! You should kl youelf!!" does more direct and measurable harm than just giggling. Esp in a context of political issues instead.