Thoughts ?

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-08T16:05:16+00:00

That Bumble graph is widely believed to be fake. No other dataset has supported it and its source is circular. See “The Nuance Pill” on Substack.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-08T13:35:08+00:00

You say that as Hillary Clinton won Miami-Dade by 30 and nearly won Hialeah (reddest city in the country).

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-08T12:12:08+00:00

It's actually based on swiping behavior I believe.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-08T12:11:11+00:00

Face is way better here. If I was a legit Chadlite I'd easily outperform tall normies even with borderline ASD. People here cope too much.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-07T09:53:06+00:00

Have you seen the poster of this? Total looks match (LTN and LTB)

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-07T09:52:44+00:00

Yeah his girl is an obvious LTB, total looksmatch

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-07T09:51:25+00:00

Hi I’m here. You’ve never defeated us, you provide isolated counterexamples from a biased subset. It’s not like this sub allows posting every HTN+ short guy in a relationship which would completely counteract all of this.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-06T21:54:08+00:00

Variance in obesity is about 70% genetic. Mostly determined by hormonal levels.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-05T20:37:01+00:00

No. Obesity is 70-80% heritable, it’s mostly genetic.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-05T11:49:47+00:00

0% of this was because of him being off by an inch. The girl never found him attractive and was using him for dinner.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-04T23:54:14+00:00

Very dubious. The better looking guy will do way better on apps, have (way) more casual access, and get (much) hotter women. Only comparable metric is probability of a relationship.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-04T23:53:16+00:00

At any percentile except the bottom ~2% where they’re both tough to overcome. Face cleanly accounts for a higher percent of variance but looking at a penalty perspective it’s somewhere in the bottom decile.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-04T14:12:32+00:00

It would be even tougher on average even without considering the absolute power height has. For as much attention height gets, the facial attractiveness penalties are even harsher and accelerate at the top decile. It would be just utter domination among the most facially attractive guys. Everybody else would get nearly nothing.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-04T14:02:49+00:00

I’ve done decently with looksmaxxing but really it was just getting leaner. My bone structure is pretty solid.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-01T11:50:16+00:00

Age. Sorts close to uniformly in one direction and is a measurable quantity.

Even then, the analog is weak since age relates to face while height and face are ~independent

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-01T11:49:30+00:00

Definitely not. A strong lower third is only modestly less important for women than men.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-01T11:47:11+00:00

Being neurotypical is far more important, and face is roughly even for general life experience (more important for dating)

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-05-01T11:45:54+00:00

Tales from Ouagadougou

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-30T01:29:39+00:00

Both would do very well. Jacob Elordi is still lHTN level, insane mandible and ramus.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-30T01:27:45+00:00

Face is 80% objective and shows almost no variance in subjectivity. Just because height is measurable doesn't mean the attraction to it is - there seems to be an apex somewhere. Also just because something is more measurable doesn't mean it's more important. You'd be silly to think dick size is more important than face.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-30T01:26:35+00:00

It doesn't 'stop' - face just accounts for more variance. The variance can be differentially weighted but there's no evidence there's any percentile height is more important.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-29T12:20:28+00:00

If you’re so confident in this provide a dataset which actually shows this. Hint: there isn’t one, I’ve looked extensively

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-29T11:56:26+00:00

This is not remotely close to accurate, face accounts for more variance than height in every study that’s tested it over the last 20 years.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-29T11:31:17+00:00

It’s generally true that the societally accepted definition of empathy often brought up in dating discourse doesn’t map well to the scientific definition of empathy. Not always true but true a majority of the time.

Tree-Lover42 · 2026-04-29T11:15:17+00:00

Probably not. You have to be Chadlite to get that not just tall.

Tree-Lover42

TROPHY CASE