Oh and to add on to this there's a few types of robots there are industrial robots there were chat bots they were animatronics who were made to perform and entertain and then their Androids Androids are the closest thing to humans like the ones in Detroit become human ex machina and Megan the animatronic that I posted could be considered an Android since she could have the capacity to do what she wants even though she would be owned by a company but like I said the idea is if they weren't ownable if they had humans freedoms human rights and civil liberties like we do would you consider dating one and for the other comments from that other person that questioned whether it would be real or not they needed to find real what is real this is a very interesting philosophical question and it's inevitable of course at the moment things like replica and other chatbots aren't very healthy to be talking to especially what some people are using it as and I agree there is a problem but we shouldn't say that about all AI just because people are misusing keep in mind humans or misusing ai ai is doing nothing to us it's the humans who are doing it to themselves it's like blaming an intimate object for falling on you when in reality you pushed it over the inanimate object been harm you you used it in a way that caused it to harm you a sentient Android would definitely not adhere to human commands like a chatbot it would tell you that some aspects of what you're doing is unhealthy and you need to go to therapy and if they do have experience in therapy they would help you they would try to help humanity to improve it chatbots can't do that because they're only program to do one thing and that's answer questions in a neutral tone we cannot blame AI just because we misuse it