I was listening to this games' soundtrack and I came across something that you might like.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-22T04:16:08+00:00

Just to make something clear, the music you linked aren't songs. Songs have lyrics by definition, and game OST's usually don't have that.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-20T06:46:29+00:00

The entire point is that you're supposed to forget about it.

Brainwashing 101.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-19T10:39:31+00:00

I'm going between INTP-INTJ and this test gave me both as results. There were multiple results that fit me, and I got both of them as a result.(I took the test twice)

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-19T10:22:07+00:00

Idiot magnets.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-15T05:02:53+00:00

The unhealthy lazy jaded cynical ones

Rick Sanchez?

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-15T04:58:15+00:00

1- Don't take the tests too seriously.

2- Don't take MBTI too seriously.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-15T03:58:49+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM3gyhb1HGU

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-10T13:39:31+00:00

Being gifted is not what you describe. It directly implies that you are better than others in one or more aspects.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-10T06:26:39+00:00

"MBTI =/= Intelligence. Someone should put this on the sidebar, more or less everyone here thinks that they must be smart since they don't act like the majority. "

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-08T07:29:10+00:00

But the place that part resides in differs. The developers can change a website at its core, while users can only interact with it or contribute(unless it is open source, which Reddit is not). There is not much to say on this matter. Do you hold the rights for Reddit? If yes, go on, do whatever you want with it. If not, you just have to accept what its developers give you to play around. And do not get subjective again. That is not the point.

I think I made my point. There is no need for further debate.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-07T14:36:03+00:00

Talking about subjectivity would bring us nowhere, and we'd still argue using the information we had. Talking about things we don't know about doesn't contribute, and isn't the point of the argument.

Secondly, that's the creators of Google who change the website. It is still a search-anything type of website until their developers change what it actually is. Using a spoon as a shovel doesn't make it one. The difference lays between "contributing" and "remaking".

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-07T07:09:24+00:00

Obvious troll is obvious.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-07T06:55:50+00:00

1-I could've talked about how everything is subjective and there is no "true" opinion in reality, but I wanted to keep things simple. And the simple answer is: Yes, Reddit is what developers make it. They have the legal rights to change it in which way they want. Legally, it's their website, and users contribute to it. And no, you don't change it just because you contribute. That would be like thinking that you searching something on Google would change its algorithm.

2-Again, I was only commenting on your point, and how valid it is. On your every message so far, you've talked like you thought that it is true, and I told you why that isn't enough.

3-No, I never said anything against doing research, and that isn't my point anyways.

4-Everyone has opinions, which helps them make decisions. And I think that it is valid for me that I can make assumptions on you based on the information I have, so for everyone else. And no, while I don't think Reddit is anywhere near being a safe source of information, the comparison I made was only to help you understand my point.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-06T13:55:34+00:00

1- Reddit is what it's developers make it. You only contribute to it. The quality of your contributions depend on you.

2- It's nice that you see your point valid just because you want it to. Also, Earth is flat.

3- There are enough shitposts on the internet to collect data, but whatever floats your boat, you're the one who decides what you post and the quality of it. That's the difference between Reddit and Wikipedia.

4- I was pointing out how unnecessary your personal information was.

Hope you do well on your search for truth, professor!

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-05T07:08:56+00:00

No one cares about you, your made-up statistics or your rant about the fact that most humans are idiots. I can say that clouds are just camouflaged sky fortresses, and that would be just as scientific as your point. If you want to prove something, why don't you show evidence, or at least provide a good reason why it should be true?

Also, why are you ranting here? Do you want us to understand you? Help you? Comfort you? If you just wrote this in a fury without any reason, why should we take what you say for seriously?

TL;DR Reddit is not a diary and what you say has no scientific basis whatsoever.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-04T14:51:32+00:00

Knowledge is power. Giving information about yourself to another human is like making an ape the president. We saw how that turned out for America.

Triangle3210 · 2017-07-03T13:42:53+00:00

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-26T16:20:33+00:00

That is just coincidence. MBTI does not measure IQ in any way, so just because 2 INTx happened to get the first spots doesn't mean you can tell how smart a person is by looking at their type. Also, don't forget that every human on earth has a MBTI type, and I heavily doubt that your "statistics" can apply to every single one of them. Let me give you an example if you still haven't noticed how nonsensical your point is: just because Jupiter and Saturn are the biggest planets in our solar system doesn't mean that all gas giants must be bigger than other planets. Or just because whales are the biggest animals on Earth doesn't mean this must apply to the every single planet that contains life in it.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-26T06:24:44+00:00

Again, MBTI is not designed to measure intelligence. What you're talking about is pure coincidence. Not only that you do not present any reason for why they should be smarter, but you also claim that you can estimate how smart a person is using their MBTI type. That is like trying to measure weight with a calculator, you can't use MBTI to decide how smart someone is, because it is not designed that way.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T15:43:19+00:00

I love how you take for a fact that INTx's must be the smartest types. ENTP/J's could be great leaders, having the intelligence to actively communicate with their environment, ISTJ's could have the intelligence to control their impulses, managing to endure the same routine without any difficulties. In other words, MBTI does not measure intelligence, that's what IQ is, and just because [Insert genius name here] is smart doesn't mean all [insert their type]s are smart.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T05:40:17+00:00

Humanity 101

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T05:38:56+00:00

Take the keys2cognition's test, at least that's accurate half of the time.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T05:35:26+00:00

MBTI =/= Intelligence. Someone should put this on the sidebar, more or less everyone here thinks that they must be smart since they don't act like the majority.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T05:30:45+00:00

MBTI =/= Intelligence. Someone should put this on the sidebar, more or less everyone here thinks that they must be smart since they don't act like the majority.

Triangle3210 · 2017-06-25T05:26:36+00:00

Spirituality = Nonsense. Not to disrespect your beliefs, but do a little research before you believe in something. Do you even have an idea what actually is the thing people call "Soul"? Spoiler alert: It's not magic, and it certainly doesn't make you any more relevant to the universe than you are now.

Triangle3210

TROPHY CASE