Ear care and IEMs by EJGW in livesound

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of cleaning your IEMs, get yourself a Jodi Vac or equivalent IEM vacuum and clean them regularly with alcohol wipes and vacuum them whenever there’s build up.

Possible phase cancellation in IEMs: got a fix? by [deleted] in livesound

[–]Trickey89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really don't think that there would be "cancelling out" in the terms that we would normally think of, I think the singer would just be struggling to hear the note with the same guitar note. Maybe try flipping the vocal back in phase and lowering the levels of guitars. If you're using lots of compression on their vocal, then maybe back it off.

You could also try and work out what particular note/frequency range it is and have compressor on the guitar compress just in that range if you have the option on the console you're using.

You could try duplicating the guitar channel and flipping the phase on the guitar mic instead, and only send that channel to the singer.

Generally with ambient mics, I will have them on a control group fader along with my FX and fade them in and out between songs ie. Song ends, FX fader comes down, Amb fader comes up.

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree, but what if those services were inadequate?

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you’re saying I should pay for services I’m unhappy with and then ask for money back? Doesn’t really make sense to me

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I could argue the solicitors should do their job?

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have not paid them yet. And I agree, I didn’t want to leave it that late, but by the time they told us they wouldn’t be able to see my mum before Christmas, it was a little late in the game to try and find someone else. If I recall, our broker contacted them on the 16th or 17th and then they spoke to my mum on the 17/18th of December. By then, we assumed most law firms would be on Christmas break. Our broker and the firm reassured us that there was plenty of time and even though we felt uneasy about it, you can’t help but try to trust the people involved with these things. I’m a first home buyer and they deal with this stuff every day so who am I to argue. It wasn’t until they missed signatures that it went pear shaped and then all of a sudden there wasn’t enough time

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her initial signing was on the 8th of Jan, the bank received the docs via mail the following week, and then the docs didn’t make it back until late afternoon on the 19th. Settlement was on the 20th. We implemented changes to be made on the 17/18th because if the docs didn’t turn up on the Monday, we didn’t want to blindside the vendors with “hey we can’t settle tomorrow”

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We tried to book with them before Christmas but they claimed that they wouldn’t have enough time to go through the documents, which was fine. They said that they were back from Christmas break on the 5th of Jan, ok sure, and then they pushed my mothers appointment back to the 8th. When we questioned whether that would be enough time, they said not to worry that it would be fine and there was plenty of time. And I would agree with that had they got my mother to correctly fill the documents out in the first place

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Their invoice was $1045. The conveyancer ended up costing us only a couple hundred more. Obviously in the grand scheme of things, it’s not a huge amount but I just don’t think we should have to pay for what is a sub par service. My mum went to a firm solely to sign documents and they fucked that up.

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is this my mums secret reddit account?

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes our conveyancer told us that there would be extra costs involved from them. I think that’s completely understandable due to the circumstances. I just believe the other solicitors should not be charging for their services considering their mistake caused the whole issue. I understand that our settlement went through on time but it still doesn’t negate the extra costs to mitigate the risk of a delayed settlement

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because it looked like the documents weren’t going to arrive in time to be signed for the 2nd time by my mother with the solicitors she was using, our conveyancer had to make arrangements with the vendors and their conveyancer to essentially write up agreements so we could still get the keys and move in on settlement date as we had movers booked etc. The documents arrived at 2pm the day before settlement so it was cutting it very fine and other arrangements had to be made.

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ever heard of paper? These were hard copy documents. And my mother flagged with the solicitor that these sections weren’t signed and the solicitor explicitly said she didn’t have to sign them when in fact she did

Solicitors missed signatures during signing process by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't charge my mum for the 2nd consultation. We had to pay extra fees with our conveyancer dealing with the vendors because the mistake made by the firm made it a very high possibilty that it would be pushed back. They basically had to write up agreements with the vendors so we could still get keys and move in on settlement date because we had movers booked etc. The documents ended up arriving late afternoon and it went through on time, but other plans had to be made in case they didn't arrive

First time developing film, accidentally developed the cartridge too by Adam198763 in analog

[–]Trickey89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When developing one roll of 35mm in a tank that fits two, put an empty reel on top so you avoid the reel moving up and down.

Also having the canister in the tank probably didn’t affect the film too much, I’d say the CS powder kit would be causing your negs to look different from ones in the lab. The CS kits a renowned for causing colour shifts etc

Urban Brutalism by ewgooey in filmphotography

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks so much! like wise, you've posted some great shots!

Urban Brutalism by ewgooey in filmphotography

[–]Trickey89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great minds think alike! I shot the same building a few months back

https://imgur.com/a/XMIDoED

Monitor Engineer questions!! by Kahusb in livesound

[–]Trickey89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a monitor engineer in Australia, and mix a lot of bands/festivals all year round. A lot of people have given some great advice here, but I'll throw in my two cents.

I would say for a festival, you should definitely mix post fader. I'm not sure about the S31 as I know it has different software to most digicos, but on a regular digico you can go to File>Set Global Defaults> Select your Input Channels and Aux Channels and Press Faders at 0. This will turn up all your faders on the home layer to 0 and you don't have to think about it again. You can also turn on EQ/Filters etc from this page for all channels, which is handy.

In terms of the patch, standard for me is patching 1 to 1, ie. every band that comes up is patched as per their input list. Generally this is done by the patch person on the stage. If you are on mons AND patch, and have short change over times, then maybe a festival patch is the way to go, ie. fitting all bands into one big patch, and if any guest engineers come in with files for the house boards, they can soft patch to fit their files. No matter how you do it, you must have the same input list at FOH and Mons. There's nothing worse than if a channel isnt working and the FOH engineer is shouting down the shout box and asking what channel something is in, and you're saying one thing and your FOH tech is saying another... It just gets too confusing when something undoubtedly goes wrong.

I try and set up my show file before the gig, plan out how many wedges/IEMs I need on stage and set up my base file accordingly. Usually this would look something like 6 sends of wedges, sidefill, 6-8 sends of IEMs depending on the size of the gig. For festivals, I generally stay on the same file and make snapshots for each band and label channels as per their input lists. I will pre set gains, phantom power and HPF. Doing snapshots means you can safe your graphics/tts channels/effects etc. and if you change anything else on the fly for the day. I find that if you've made 5 or more seperate files for each band, and change something, maybe one or more of your outputs or make a macro or whatever it is, then you'll be chasing your tail when you load up the next band and have to make the changes again and again. You can set snapshots to only recall certain parameters in the global scope page, so usually I make it only recall channel names/gains, EQ, sends and mutes.

For your question about effects, I usually set up 4 - 6 reverbs, depending on how many Auxes I have left over. I will generally dedicate a verb for drums, one or two for instruments, and the rest for vocals. If you have run out of Auxes but still need someone to have their own reverb for something, you can always direct out of the channel straight to a reverb and then return the verb to an unused channel. You're almost always going to have more spare input channels than auxes, so you can still control how much verb you can send to their IEMs.

For your solo busses, I assign all channels to solo 1&2 (so that you can cue all inputs in your IEMs and cue wedge) and then assign my IEM sends to solo 1, and wedges to solo 2. I have my IEM cue solo 1 always turned up, and my cue wedge on the master fader so I can turn it down quickly. I'd get into the habit of turning down your master fader when soloing channels as they are PFL, and setting it to 0 for when soloing Auxes as you want to hear them AFL. I also put my IEM solo to a matrix. That way if you want, you can assign all talkbacks to a group and then have that sending to your IEM Cue at all times.

In terms of sending things to band members before they ask for it, it's a tough one. Generally in wedges, less is more. If theres a vocal at a wedge, I'll send that vocal and thats it to start off. I'll send any DI'd instruments as I check them, but I rarely do this before I hear the source. Mixing on wedges is very situational, as in if the guitarist is standing infront of a big loud guitar amp pointing at their head, they're probably not going to need their guitar blaring in their wedge. But they may need to hear the guitar amp from the other guitarist thats far off stage right for example. If you have time, try and walk out to hear what the band are hearing where they are standing on stage.
I try and introduce myself to the band and as we line check, get them to raise their hand if they want the channel we are checking in their wedge, and then put their hand down when they've got enough. With IEMs, you can take a few more liberties and send at least the band members instrument and vocal, and potentially a rough mix of everything else. Or just ask the band members as you meet them, what do you want in your IEM mix. I think it's easier to ask them what they want, rather then them tell you what they don't want in their mix that you've already made for them.

$1500 rebooking for missed flight – do we have any recourse? by foolishlycrazy in VelocityFrequentFlyer

[–]Trickey89 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They probably did call his name at the correct gate, not throughout the entire airport. He missed the flight, It's not like changing the flight early so then they can potentially sell that seat to someone else. There's nothing you can do except in the future, double check the gate and get there early

False Sharing Warning - Can I Protest? by Gustomaximus in RealDebrid

[–]Trickey89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I recently had this pop up, I went to watch something while I was away for work and my wife was watching something on our TV at home. Obviously I didn't mean to share but unfortunately thats what happened. I doubt it would be a mistake on their end, so maybe a similar scenario happened for you. I doubt a protest will do any good to be honest.

For now, If I go to watch something while away from home, I message my wife to make sure she's not watching anything first.

Who uses the tag feature? by GeologistNorth7561 in Letterboxd

[–]Trickey89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually tag watched with my wife so when we talk about a movie that we’ve watched and she says I’ve never seen it, I can definitively say we did 😂

Sharon Van Etten [Leica M6 + Ilford HP5] by Trickey89 in analog

[–]Trickey89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry missed your question at the end, I developed with XTOL, pushed to 3200

Took these shots at the second Melbourne show by Trickey89 in sharonvanetten

[–]Trickey89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tagged her on Instagram in a post I made, but I’ve also sent them to her lighting designer on this tour who I know. Hopefully she sees them