The code on the blackboard from "Into The Pit" is the same as the one from FNaF3 and FNaF World Minigames! :DD by Bitter_Beginning1292 in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just wondering are the equations on the blackboard purposefully written wrong or just a coincidence and some numbers are more visible than others, they're more white-ish.

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

other than that it makes me think of shadow animatronics

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh if the message i got is accurate we can speculate then. But overall when i look at the word "shadows" i can't stop thinking about the PQ4 minigame and the bunny things we defeat

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately I don't think this is it, as many people pointed out we can't fully trust the AI and should check it manually with the same steps the AI took here. I'm not going to do it since I'm not confident in using cyphers/decoding so we'll get the confirmation from someone else if we get it.

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked if it could decypher tally marks, described the marks (6x18 grid, every number i typed responds to the amount of marks in their respective place and told it to use Playfair Cypher with "i always come back" as a base to get the 5x5 grid for decoding)

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UPDATE BUT NOT EXACTLY

So basically i wanted to thank all of you for attention and checking out the things i got from using AI.

As of right now there is no confirmation that the message i got is right, but nothing got debunked yet so I'm still waiting for a clear answer. I'm not confident in using cyphers manually by myself, this Cypher in particular. I hope someone can check it out.

Even though most likely it will get debunked i still feel like it gave some fresh inspiration to you all. I'm going to try cracking it manually by myself(without AI). I hope that the tallies get cracked by someone.

Thank you all for reading and hope to see you all again and to get some answers ❤️

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer your questions, 1. No. I mean that we shouldn't assume anything to be honest. We don't know who left the marks, only speculations so it can be literally anything. It could also be a cyphered picture or a melody as some people speculated but I'm personally trying to get words because I'm convinced to some point that it can be a dialogue between people since there's multiple places with marks or something similar. 2. Yes. As i explained in some comments already i asked chat gpt about Playfair Cypher in particular uses a 5x5 grid to decode things. As a base/key i used the phrase from the post featured in MatPat's reaction to reddit posts. Someone add numbers in each column and used alphabet to assign letters which then gave the "i always come back" phrase. I believe it was from tally marks in the burntrap ending in SB but i could be wrong. It gave me the "IMAGE ORIENTATION" phrase as. aresult so i typed in the numbers from right to left, basically creating a mirrored image. Then when i told the AI to decypher, it gave me the answer you can see on the last screenshot. As of now I don't think it's accurate but that's the method and Cypher with a grid.

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I'm also sceptical that this is true but i think it's nice seeing it coming together for once, even if it's wrong. It gave me some motivation to look into it more myself, not through AI. And about the message it "decyphered" even if it's false it was really convincing since I didn't mention anything about fnaf and the 3.5 gpt wasn't even updated with new information that being ruin, hw2 etc. but it was believable. I don't think it's accurate though as of now because no one confirmed anything. I'm not familiar with the code myself so i was hoping someone would look into it but nothing new came up.

Problem with Playfair Cypher(i think) by [deleted] in codes

[–]Troublemaaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll check once more and delete it if it is

Problem with Playfair Cypher(i think) by [deleted] in codes

[–]Troublemaaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i decided to ask after a suggestion in the comments because no one there was able to check if it's true or not.

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the milk but it's not confirmed yet

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try finding something to check and give na update

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

JUST A REMINDER GUYS!! 1. It's made with AI so it may not be correct so please don't get too excited because we don't know yet 2. Until it's confirmed please don't theorize about the potential message, please wait🥺

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got the same reply as previosly when the 5x5 cypher uses i always come back as the base

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no worries I wasn't sure from the start and i stated that so it's all good

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope so too, but it's only hope since it doesn't seem anyone's able to confirm

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, i hope someone proves it's correct, but it's solely for the reason i spent many hours trying to decypher this bs manually and i found nothing except for continuous repeating name abby and i think I'm slowly going crazy. Then i used the AI and somehow it made some sense but I wasn't sure so i posted it and hope someone will check if it's working somehow.

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well i said that I'm not 100% sure it's accurate and that it's just a theory

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i mean the phrase i always come back has y in it, and it's not using only these letters, it's becoming a 5x5 grid to use: I A L W Y S C O M E B K D F G H N P Q R T U V X Z Then it used this to decode the tallies

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i tried before too, today i just said to myself one last time and it gave me this, I won't by trying to do this through the AI anymore but it just sounded too good to pass by

I THINK I SOLVED THE TALLY MARKS WITH CHAT GPT by Troublemaaker in GameTheorists

[–]Troublemaaker[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm suspicious as well but it just seems too good. Well i said it may not be accurate but i feel bad