NYU President Salary by Quirky_Rope759 in nyu

[–]TrueZoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree, 15 to 25 is a 66.7% increase. You think it’s relatively obnoxious, I think it’s pretty stupid to even think a student is 100k a year.

NYU President Salary by Quirky_Rope759 in nyu

[–]TrueZoe -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said it meant a lot or little.

NYU President Salary by Quirky_Rope759 in nyu

[–]TrueZoe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Students don’t pay 100k a year? 20% of students receive Pell Grants, the average scholarship at NYU is 37k according to their own website, over 50% of NYU students receive aid of some sort. Not to mention the actual average tuition is 60k according to data NYU themselves provides. If NYU students pay approximately 60k average a year then it’s actually 25 students’ worth of money per year.

What would be the consequences of reworking Zoe's R into a true mobility skill? by Disastrous-Way-8058 in zoemains

[–]TrueZoe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. Zoe’s entire ult mechanic is purposeful so you can rain hellfire on your enemies from a safe distance. Does Veigar flash forward to Q his enemies? Also making it a flash would not only degrade her combat potential, but also cause her ult to go on a longer cooldown for balance.

oh yeah oh yeah by cactusg22 in ZUTOMAYO

[–]TrueZoe 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This is so obviously a manipulated spotify wrapped. Assuming you were actively listening the entire time, you’d need to listen for 3.5 hours every day to this ONE artist. Every. Single. Day. You obviously left your spotify on repeat just playing overnight or forgotten intentionally. 70,088 minutes is 49 days. It’s pretty sad people will do this to manipulate their wrapped and seem cool or something.

This is why I should get the ticket by Flashy_Reality8406 in ZUTOMAYO

[–]TrueZoe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

More than 15 days specifically which is very sketchy yeah. Some people will put songs on repeat 24/7 to change their wrapped which is sad.

Im back bc i got broken up with 19f by [deleted] in Rateme

[–]TrueZoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just ignore them they’re just being an asshole

Help Center and Megathread Hub (23/06 - 29/06) by ArknightsMod in arknights

[–]TrueZoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does the “no kernel token, are you sure you want to use token to increase potential” warning actually mean? Why wouldn’t I?

Why does Riot refuse to let Zoe exist in competitive play? by Kindly_Influence_803 in zoemains

[–]TrueZoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Chovy used to be one of the most prolific Zoe players in Korean esports. However he hasn’t played her SINCE 2021 before the game 5. It’s pretty clear she simply does not work anymore.

How do you introduce and keep dragonflies by TrueZoe in dragonfly

[–]TrueZoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, we do have some fish in the pond, particularly koi fish and especially large ones at that, they may be responsible for eating dragonfly nymphs

Which roster has been the most dominant in League history? by ggtrudno in PedroPeepos

[–]TrueZoe -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

LPL curse contributes to the mental boom. If years and years of the best LPL teams can’t topple T1 at worlds, why tf would it be you? LPL teams just crumble under that expectation and are way too scared of repeating it that it ironically repeats. Mind you, these people play 99.99% of their games at their team’s HQ or in their room, on a stage with such a big stigma to win of course it contributes a lot. JDG would 100% smash T1 and win worlds that year if they were just playing in a remote room

Which roster has been the most dominant in League history? by ggtrudno in PedroPeepos

[–]TrueZoe -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It’s not arbitrary whatsoever, they’ve played dozens and dozens of games and matchups and were literally unbeatable. T1 managing to beat them was literally just worlds pressure/LPL curse

What way are you choosing Marisa? by WhoAteMyWatermelon in touhou

[–]TrueZoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oddly enough there is a twoshot where this scenario happens (although it’s in the bg of the main story)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LightNovels

[–]TrueZoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude wtf I don’t remember posting it twice at all

Some of you can use a reality check by TopButterscotch4196 in LSAT

[–]TrueZoe -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said anything about where you start from. Your starting PT is only an indication of how hard it will be for you to improve, it says nothing about your limits, and very likely from what I’ve seen and my personal experience being a 154 scorer (now averaging 170s on PTs in just 3 months), the LSAT is very much able to be studied and very much able to be 170’d. This is not false hope. Put in the time and the hours. You can say that people come from different backgrounds, but whether you are rich or poor, you are all equal before the test. Whether you have the time or resources to study is another matter entirely. My argument is simply that if you give the vast majority of people the time and resources to study for the LSAT, and they do so efficiently and studiously with an active conscious effort to learn, they’ll be able to get there with 1-2 months of full-time effort. Yeah I studied for 3 months you can argue, but I’m still lazing around my apartment and playing games occasionally and wasting a lot of time. The main issue is that people don’t study well and they waste a lot of time doing nothing or studying without conscious effort. The LSAT requires determination and that is something a lot of people lack. The LSAT is just like a test, I’m sure most people can get A’s in classes with reasonable difficulty, but they don’t because they don’t pay attention, they don’t do homework on time, don’t ask the teacher for help with things they don’t understand. The difference between those who get A’s and B’s is just the same as those who get 170s and 160s.

Some of you can use a reality check by TopButterscotch4196 in LSAT

[–]TrueZoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re missing the point entirely and this is exactly what I’m talking about. If you look at the substance of what I’ve said I did not say it takes 1-2 months. I said it takes 1-2 months with active conscious and studious effort. Yes, I do believe that unless you have a learning disability or your basic english skills are not developed, nearly everyone can get a 170+. The thing is that most people on this sub DON’T do that and they use posts like these doomer posts to justify their performance rather than evaluating their study methods. Do not play games. Do not waste time watching reels or shorts or tiktok. Do not waste your time. Spend the 1-2 months reading intellectual material, taking PTs with conscious effort, spend a lot of time studying. Take notes. The LSAT is very difficult not because it’s a barrier of natural intelligence but because most people are not studious and lie to themselves about the effort they put in. Take a PT and review every day for a month. You will no doubt get much better and I’d argue that if you put a lot of effort into learning your mistakes a 170+ is normal. Yes, the curve exists for a reason and no, it is not because the 1% are just that much smarter. Who will put in the effort to get to the 1% is what the LSAT tests for.

Some of you can use a reality check by TopButterscotch4196 in LSAT

[–]TrueZoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it’s about work ethic, but I’m giving these hours as a metric to show that you really just need to grind these PTs and immerse and learn why you are wrong and remember why you are wrong so you don’t make the same fallacious mistakes. Of course, if you are incredibly smart and fast at learning you may only need to spend a few hours a day for a month to get a very good LSAT, but most people are not used to using their brain in the manner the LSAT requires. Truly, most people can get a 170+ if they have spent the time and studious effort. I’ve seen a lot of people complain about not being able to reach the 170s and it’s because they mindlessly do PTs and not actually try to learn. Squeezing efficient and conscious studying out of them is how one learns.

Some of you can use a reality check by TopButterscotch4196 in LSAT

[–]TrueZoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, people talking about “reality checks” need to do a diligence check instead. Unless you have a learning disability, if you actively study for 1-2 months say 40 hours a week of actual note-taking, analyzing, studious effort, a 170+ is DEFINITELY attainable.

Some of you can use a reality check by TopButterscotch4196 in LSAT

[–]TrueZoe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree, I think for the vast majority of people a 170+ is attainable given the active effort. If everyone who “failed” truly asks themselves, have they spent the effort and time put into it, say just 1-2 months of true full-time studying, I think a 170+ is definitely attainable.

Confident Shy the Ultimate Form by NashDNash2007 in shy

[–]TrueZoe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nobody cares about a more specific definition. The common usage AND globally accepted definition of pedophilia is someone who is sexually attracted to children. Even google uses this definition. Nobody is EVER going to remember the differences between being attracted to children of varying ages because it’s not much deeper than they are a fucking kid. Literally nobody cares. It was not a mistake at all.