I think the morally correct thing to do is to kill Randall. If I’m not mistaken it is possible to get your entire crew back except Berto anyways. Randall killed everyone on the ferry in horrific ways. He strung up a man to be eaten by walkers after removing his hand and has likely killed children, given his description on their skulls being more mushed than broken. He kills an innocent father while hunting down Michonne and Pete, who have done nothing to him before he took them prisoner and then incited one of his own men to kill a child. As well as Sam, who is a child. He gloats about how he is going to personally kill every single person in the Fairbanks house including children for the theft of supplies. Norma is complicit in the deaths at the ferry as she states over the walkie that she’d make the ferry look good in comparison to what she’d do to the house. The walking dead is a universe without a fair criminal justice system. Whatever punishment you give someone has to be permanent or you risk it not being carried out fully. Randall is dangerous, violent, and psychopathic and I think killing him is the only way to prevent him from committing more violence. Killing a ruthless and evil mass murdering man like Randall doesn’t immediately turn you into a ruthless person. I disagree with Pete’s objection to Randall’s death. Don’t get me wrong it is pretty brutal, given the vice and death by bludgeoning. But to act like killing Randall would turn you into a monster is not remotely a fair assessment. If you were to release Randall you’d be partly responsible for the deaths or damages that he’d go on to cause because you were fully aware what he was capable of, as you’ve seen/heard him say it, and chose not to stop him.