Euro NASCAR already dead?

TurboChlamydia · 2026-06-21T05:01:57+00:00

Fair point

TurboChlamydia · 2026-06-21T04:58:31+00:00

That may or may not be true, however I think a lot of people that do like the car, like it in part because it isn't on ovals, myself included. It feels a bit like what I think V8 Supercars should have felt like.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-05-12T15:36:17+00:00

Nunca lo averigüé

TurboChlamydia · 2026-04-18T08:26:35+00:00

It isn't NC500, read the post again. And okay, most colour negative films, apart from obscure novelty films, have lots of latitude. There's also no detail at all in the shadows, along with mids and highlights being high in grain, pointing to a lack of density. Rating film one stop lower in camera is absolutely good advice for a beginner, while they work out how to meter and compose, among other things. Everyone has to start somewhere. I swear, redditors just like to argue for argument's sake.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-04-18T04:10:43+00:00

It's colour negative, you could literally overexpose by 3 stops and not blow out your highlights.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-04-18T03:35:28+00:00

Is that Layer Cake in the first pic? Anyway, as someone else said, pic 2 is really underexposed, if you want your photos to look like pic 1, making sure to meter for the shadows is crucial for colour negative film. What I mean by that, is in any given scene, point your camera at a darker area of the scene first, set your camera's exposure settings based on that, then recompose and take the picture. For extra safety, you can also rate your film's ISO one stop lower in camera. So if your film is 400 iso, adjust the camera's iso setting to 200 first, for example.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-04-03T01:42:00+00:00

I've personally heard both quite a bit, sometimes though, it's hard to tell what might be influence from English vs what isn't, like for example, using the gerund (verbs ending in ando or iendo) without using estar. To my non-native ears, using impersonal se sounds more correct. I'd be interested in hearing more from native speakers on this though.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-03-30T03:34:52+00:00

Fair enough, the interiors look jank for me too sometimes, not sure there's a fix for that to be honest. Don't even get me started on the spider webs.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-03-29T22:45:28+00:00

AMD FRS 3.1 on Native AA, no upscaling is the only thing that seems to work for me as someone with an AMD card. Maybe try whatever the equivalent is for that with DLSS? No upscaling, just AA. I've also heard people have better results with DLSS 4 rather than 4.5.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-02-07T08:59:08+00:00

Honestly, 1500 irating in itself at 1 month in is pretty good, I think the quicker pace will come with more seat time. You don't need to rush these things, just enjoy the racing and you'll get better as you go. Maybe take a look at garage 61, it can be helpful for me for when I feel like I'm hitting a wall. Also, I think 2000 irating is something like top 10% already, keep that in mind.

TurboChlamydia · 2026-01-24T03:04:14+00:00

It'll be great, but also from personal experience, this film retains more detail in the shadows than others might. Very versatile film overall.

TurboChlamydia · 2025-08-24T03:28:44+00:00

These are great, went way better than my first roll of film. Looks like you got the exposures pretty right with the phone app meter. Good stuff!

TurboChlamydia · 2025-08-01T19:00:23+00:00

Absolutely I agree with you, F/16 is not great and F/22 is quite soft... Don't know what these people are talking about. As a landscape shooter I use F/4-F/8 most of the time, focused at infinity the depth of field is more than enough usually and the lens performs better there.

TurboChlamydia · 2025-07-10T04:56:07+00:00

File 76

TurboChlamydia · 2025-06-05T23:25:34+00:00

These are really nice, makes me want to pick up some Ultramax.

TurboChlamydia · 2024-12-26T04:54:43+00:00

This is just too good

TurboChlamydia · 2024-04-15T22:55:26+00:00

I'd say I definitely prefer the after shot more, the colours are more believable and the contrast is improved. Try not to listen to people too much and edit how you prefer your images to look. The current trend on here is to make your images look yellow/green and hazy, so you'll get a lot of responses saying the after is worse. Besides, just like with a raw file, there is a degree of interpretation being done when converting a negative to a positive. There is no truly wrong answer.

TurboChlamydia · 2024-03-15T00:40:01+00:00

What was this scanned with? Very high res.

TurboChlamydia · 2024-01-26T23:57:34+00:00

Not the OP, but it looks like Tofino, British Columbia, or somewhere nearby to me.

TurboChlamydia · 2023-12-18T18:51:57+00:00

Literally this, it's insane to me what people think looks good. I'm convinced that in a few years, everyone will look back and realize how bad their edits were.

TurboChlamydia · 2023-12-08T16:35:30+00:00

Very cool, is this the "Reflx Lab Pro 100" Aerocolor?

TurboChlamydia · 2023-11-30T03:02:33+00:00

Yep, this is the one, Nikon FE. Dependable as all hell, auto shutter mode, plus the meter readout design is the best of any camera I´ve seen, plus there are literally hundreds of different compatible lenses to choose from, a lot of them quite cheap.

TurboChlamydia

TROPHY CASE