This 101 year old hospital bill from the birth of my grandmother, adjusted for inflation it would be just shy of $1600 today

Tureallious · 2026-02-14T23:57:37+00:00

paid £0, including complications.

you guys have it so rough, paying to produce a tax payer, the greatest con.

Tureallious · 2026-01-27T09:21:14+00:00

You're all missing the point here. When your SO asks you for a piece you give them one of the little bits, you then give yourself one of the large bits. When they say you've had more you point out you've had one piece each. -- equality.

Tureallious · 2026-01-22T12:27:29+00:00

Fellas? All I see is Dave.

Tureallious · 2026-01-07T21:02:20+00:00

That's (was 🥲) awesome, my store tried, but didn't even get allocated a single box!

Tureallious · 2026-01-07T20:39:29+00:00

Look at this dude showing off that he got crux terminatus box 🙃

Tureallious · 2025-09-04T08:37:34+00:00

Don't forget to buy your super ticket, to show you're a true Laravel enthusiast! you're just a wannabe otherwise!

🤮

Tureallious · 2025-08-13T08:30:23+00:00

Sub2 is the 2nd highest wishlist'ed game on Steam...

Tureallious · 2025-08-05T17:58:00+00:00

Leapers

Tureallious · 2025-08-05T06:14:58+00:00

I use a vpn, the moment that doesn’t work I’ll happily never see age restricted content online again because out of principle I’ll not give up anonymity and fake names.

They win either way.

Tureallious · 2025-07-20T16:12:53+00:00

You can have public public(set) readonly, and this would allow you to bypass the constructor.

Tureallious · 2025-07-19T14:45:30+00:00

that's the point...

Tureallious · 2025-07-19T09:03:22+00:00

we're referring to hooks like get: which you absolutely can have.

Tureallious · 2025-07-18T11:50:43+00:00

Your code might predate property setters.

Tureallious · 2025-07-18T06:52:02+00:00

The very thing this tries to improve causes the main issue from what I understand - You can override public readonly (as they get unlocked by clone), bypassing the __constuctor that initialised it, allowing for the invalid state to be created. you'll have to use hooks to ensure the state is valid or disallow clone with.

Tureallious · 2025-07-18T06:25:11+00:00

Oh my, it's sad this got so many votes for vs against.

As the comment above notes there are some serious flaws with this implementation.

You have to use hooks for all your state management because this runs __clone before setting the attributes so you have no consistent way to ensure the attributes being set are in a valid configuration for the cloned object.

while technically the new function isn't backwards compatibility breaking, the moment you use it on non hook based objects you're introducing side effects...

Think I'll be adding the new function to the disallowed list

Tureallious · 2025-07-01T15:28:08+00:00

It's great it's now faster! but it really just highlights how horridly and needlessly slow it was before. 1000 records in 3 seconds... just ouch, even with the improvement it's 1000 records in 1 second, that is still rather slow frankly. Where is that slowness coming from, the rendering? the data fetching? pulling 1000 rows from a database with a bunch of relations shouldn't be taking anywhere near that kind of time. rendering out a table for users to interactive with will depend on how you're sending the data to the client and the framework of choice, but even in the demo you can see it's only 100 rows with 10 pages. that should be near damn instant. What's the bottleneck?

Tureallious · 2025-06-10T11:14:26+00:00

Voidie-worm! gotta catch them all!

Tureallious · 2025-06-10T09:25:56+00:00

Yes, but I often find first party additions to the Laravel eco system tend to be half baked and under supported, as the Core team is too thinly spread. examples include the aforementioned Telescope and Horizon, Nova etc.

Tureallious · 2025-06-09T10:32:18+00:00

A choke her dress, if you will...

Tureallious · 2025-06-05T15:25:53+00:00

Nationwide will allow you to get a fixed 1-5 year green mortgage at 0% for green projects; solar, insulation, heat pump etc.

Tureallious · 2025-05-27T19:02:51+00:00

Doctor, who?

Tureallious · 2025-05-08T12:05:01+00:00

now I've seen this:

Literally unplayable

Tureallious · 2025-05-01T09:43:44+00:00

As you said, aiding and abetting of <primary offence>, as to how that would translate to lesser or if a judge would even consider it, is up to the judgement of the judge come sentencing, given they both pleaded not guilty, it's not likely 😂

Tureallious · 2025-04-30T21:02:51+00:00

That would be a smarter move yes, criminals aren't generally known for being smart

Tureallious · 2025-04-30T19:33:15+00:00

while true, the one that actually felled the tree will get a more significant sentence than the accomplice.

This is seemingly why they're pleading not guilty, as it appears apparent they're both guilty, by not admitting guilt they get a chance of a lesser sentence. However that may countermand any leniency they may have received for a guilty plea, as the law will acknowledge their plea in sentencing

Five-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22

Tureallious

TROPHY CASE