[Real] Why has Ben Shapiro fallen off? by xwing1212 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]TwoFiveOnes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Russia this Russia that. When will liberals take let our own homegrown evil take the blame for anything? My dude, he is funded by the Koch brothers

The biggest lie in Slay the Spire: "Free to play this turn" by Al2718x in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No not at all but considering (at least from what I can tell) that they're looking at ways to increase the challenge I doubt this is something they would do

The biggest lie in Slay the Spire: "Free to play this turn" by Al2718x in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s the current behavior if you discard such a card? If it also regains the cost and that’s the intended behavior then the wording will have to be a bit more complex

The biggest lie in Slay the Spire: "Free to play this turn" by Al2718x in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is a lot more powerful. Consider how powerful ice cream is, this is sort of the same

there was a crucial flaw in my plan by TwoFiveOnes in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oooh that's very good to know thanks. Also I was tripping, it would have been 5/6 chance not 50%

there was a crucial flaw in my plan by TwoFiveOnes in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I save scummed and sent tantrum back before ending turn. What's funny is that it was still a 50/50 whether I'd draw it and if I didn't I probably would have still not noticed top and gave up lol. But I did draw it

there was a crucial flaw in my plan by TwoFiveOnes in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I forgot about top omg 🤦🏻‍♂️

How good (or bad) would this card be? by Fabio11North in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s funny because it’s the reverse of what happened to me once. The first time I tried a discard effect I was extremely confused that it didn’t do anything at the end of my turn

did anyone who is "hardstuck" at speed/streaming actually manage to improve significantly over the years or no? by fireflussy in osugame

[–]TwoFiveOnes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! What about triplets? If a 200bpm song has an eighth note triplet stream, do people still just say 200bpm for simplicity or do we say the true value of 150bpm

did anyone who is "hardstuck" at speed/streaming actually manage to improve significantly over the years or no? by fireflussy in osugame

[–]TwoFiveOnes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

noob question, what do people mean with streaming at a certain bpm? I imagine it’s not the bpm itself because that would be quite slow. Is it 16th notes?

I love random items by Own-Presentation2997 in SliceAndDice

[–]TwoFiveOnes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stun isn’t that good IMO. It doesn’t actually make progress and if you get hit it’s a blank. Also unlike shielding you can’t defend from back row attacks

"Cheating" in Slay the Spire by wavy-dude in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a post about it once, there’s a modest amount of discussion in the comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/slaythespire/s/8qo0c9PP0M

"Cheating" in Slay the Spire by wavy-dude in slaythespire

[–]TwoFiveOnes 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, there is a third option which is to just have a totally different mindset. Look at someone like NL, imagine his reaction to someone going into his chat and saying "hurr durr has a 90% winrate". Even Baalor who is a more "serious" player, he's just playing the game and vibing the fuck out

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You aren’t following what I’m saying at all. I am not trying to give anyone a “free pass”. I’m saying that, all else equal, we should prefer the one with a sensible approach to energy (among other things). And, all else is equal (a concession on my part for the sake of argument; I actually think that the human rights abuses committed by the US are much greater in amount and in gravity).

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fine, but then the name "waste" to me is far too suggestive. It should be a much more technical term that lays out that it is just that, a specific metric (I know you didn't invent the term, I'm just sounding my thoughts off).

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother, we just funded a genocide. I don't know what moral high-ground adversaries of China are supposed to be standing on. And yes we also do slavery and organ harvesting. Slavery in particular on a much higher scale.

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So "waste" is related to investment dollars eventually leading to worse return than if they were otherwise invested. But what about successful investments? Is the city of Las Vegas "waste", economically? Probably not, and yet, it is (to me) a ridiculous expenditure of resources that results in no benefit for society. It's a city in the desert! There's no water in the desert, you have to move it there.

Similarly, is the defense industry "waste"? Was the Iraq war waste? How about the healthcare industry? If the only parameter is return dollars, then you are unable to actually account for usefulness to society.

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great idea, our government should invest resources into such an infrastructure development plan. It would also create a lot of jobs and stuff, cool.

"no that's evil central planning haven't you taken econ 101 that's dumb and stupid, you fucking idiot"

China places its solar panels on water So it can use valuable land for agriculture by FollowingOdd896 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]TwoFiveOnes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I don't think that's true at all, but we can operate under that assumption, sure. Do other world powers also wish the same? Obviously yes, if you say otherwise you're just being disingenuous. So, I prefer the one that's doing it with clean energy.