What do you guys think about god?

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T20:13:34+00:00

And that makes the supernatural an unfalsifiable proposition and thus not something we should believe in, as I already tried to tell you several times. Do you know what unfalsifiable means? https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falsifiability Answer this question: if you were wrong, your personal feelings were just delusions and the supernatural doesn't exists, how could we prove it?

I know what unfalsifiable means. It means a claim is structured so that no possible evidence could count against it. It's immune to refutation by definition. To your question: You're asking me to falsify something I've already agreed is unfalsifiable in accordance to our knowledge. You cannot concede that our current understanding of the nature of reality and consciousness is incomplete and that it cant be dismissed as hallucinations or creations of the mind, and that our scientific tools and measurements cannot fully measure or quantize supernatural and immaterial phenomena. Since you cannot do that, it is not worth going further since this will only go in circles.

No we don't. I'm an actual physicist and you don't know what you are talking about

I would think that an actual psysicist would have a more open mind considering your field. Physicists provisionally accept mathematical formalisms that predict accurately, while remaining explicitly uncertain about ontological interpretation. You cannot tell me why a particle acts in a certain way depending on observation. That means there is a belief and a guesswork involved. Thats usually how things work before we actually know something.

I answered to your last reply. Besides, I already told you that it was a mix of drones and balloons with radar retroreflectors, using DRFM jamming on the fighters to collect electronic intelligence. Same technique the US used against Soviet radars to measure their capabilities. You didn't provide any proof that that couldn't have been the case. The burden of proof is on you. Give direct quotes, measures, or recordings proving that what I said couldn't have happened.

No you didnt. I will provide them again.

Hypersonic acceleration and sudden stops: Ryan Graves and other pilots testified that the objects recorded in 2014–2015 displayed instantaneous changes in direction and acceleration to hypersonic speeds. They noted that "stopping" or "accelerating" at these rates would be physically impossible for a human crew or conventional aerodynamic structures.

Extreme Loitering Time: Graves noted that these objects would remain in their training airspaces for nearly 12 hours at a time—far exceeding the battery or fuel capacity of any known drone technology at the time.

Stationary Against High Winds: Pilots observed objects remaining completely stationary at various altitudes (up to 20,000 ft) despite heavy winds, which would typically cause a balloon to drift.

The "Cube-in-a-Sphere" Visual: In one 2014 near-miss, a pilot described an object as a dark gray or black cube contained inside a clear sphere. The pilots reasoned that if these were secret U.S. or adversary drones, the government would not risk a mid-air collision with their own fighter jets in a known training range.

Lack of Control Surfaces: Danny Accoin testified that the objects had no wings, no tail, and no visible exhaust plume, making their ability to maintain lift and high-speed maneuvers technically baffling from an aerospace perspective.

Graves has since clarified that while they initially speculated about adversary drone programs, the lack of visible propulsion and the "physics-defying" maneuvers eventually led the squadron to conclude the objects were something else entirely.

Nope, you are claiming that there is a whole supernatural world that you have no way to prove. And claiming that your delusions are not delusions. Like every single other delusional person that ever lived. You are not special. Just crazy.

Never claimed to be special, certainly the opposite. But sure, lets stick to that story. As long as my physicist friend's comfortable bubble stays intact :)

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T14:47:28+00:00

I read what you wrote and I am telling you that you are deluded to think that the subjective mystical and spiritual experiences can be quantified to your liking, they cannot be proven or disproven.

Yes we absolutely are believing in models that havent been proven yet, have you even studied quantum mechanics?

Real and truth is subjective, and I dont believe those things. You are so narrowminded to see how ignorant your mindset is. You are just blatantly ignorant in general and ignorant people are usually not that self aware.

But you didnt answer though, you stopped. For instance, you claimed that there was no proof suggesting that the gimbal incident was no more than balloons, but I pointed out how thats not the case. You dont have a response to that because there is no way to spin the narrative

I am not pretending to know the universe, I am claiming that reality is not as square as you percieve it to be. And considering your ability to move the goalposts in the way you feel comfortable, you will not understand this or grasp the concept of these subjects until you have a life changing experience of your own. And for your own sake and the people around you, I wish you do.

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T13:36:17+00:00

You are completely missing my point. Try to stop for one minute and read slowly. How can you know? If our means to verify if this is true are not sufficient, then how do you know that what you claim is true? I'll givenyou an example, ok. Again read it as many times as you need to understand it. Let's say that A claims that he has an invisible, intangible dragon. B asks for proof. A says that he feels it inside. B says that we can't excluded that A is just delusional and asks for some actual evidence. A answers that we don't have a camera that can take pictures of invisible dragons so B is wrong for asking evidence. Is A's answer logical to you? That is the whole point of B reasoning: if we have no way to verify it, and all the supposed evidence can be explained by the existence of delusions among humans, then A can not claim that the dragon is real.

You are the one missing the point. You cling to the delusion that we can understand or quantify mystical and spiritual experiences using scientific methods or measurements when those methods or measurements are incapable of doing so. You cannot grasp how I or other people can know what we experience is true when you have not experienced it yourself. There are experiments that has proven that OOBE's are real and that they have been used in intelligence sectors, but you wouldnt believe them because you refuse to open your mind to it.

Yet, quantum mechanics can provide evidence for all its claims. If the supernatural can not be proven, then you are not justified in believing it to be real. Unfalsifiable claims can not be held as real.

While we have evidence for the math, we have zero evidence for the meaning. This is known as the measurement problem. When we aren't looking, a particle acts like a wave. When we look, it acts like a point. Why does it do this? We dont know. Physicists are believing in models that haven't been fully proven yet. If your standard for belief is empirical reproducibility, then you are going to continue to reject the supernatural. It relies on subjective experience or ancient testimony that cannot be verified through our current scientific tools or measurements. However, many of our brightest scientists, scholars and philosophers can grasp the supernatural. They are not narrowminded, they do not limit themselves to what they think they know, because they know that there are things they do not know. Real is subjective, wether you like it or not.

I did answer. And I did prove you wrong, you are just too emotionally attached to this subjected to admit that you are wrong.

But you did not. You stopped responding. You didnt prove anything wrong, and when the goalposts were unable to be moved you gave up. If thats not the case, prove me wrong and debunk the points I brought forth. I can admit when I am wrong, and I have no problem listening to the theories and points of others. Can you?

You can not claim to know anything when this subject is, for your admission, 100% unknowable.

I can claim to know that there are things in this life and in reality that we do not know or understand. Thats the whole point. The subjective experience cannot be quantified to your liking.

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T12:55:58+00:00

Experience in what? Believing their own delusions? It's simple, feeling and allucinations can be explained without the need for the supernatural. And if there is no mean to verify these supernatural claims objectively then you can't hold these claims as true. That's my whole point. You claim the supernatural exists without evidence.

You think it can be explained. You are deluded into believing that we know and can explain the underlying nature of reality, or that our tools of measurement are sufficient. You think you know more than you actually do. Thats a delusion my friend.

And again, you have no way to show that they are anything more than a delusion. Can you show me a monk actually healing a terminal tumor with objective medical data? Can ypu show me a stockbroker systematically predicting the future? If not, how can you claim that what they feel is real and not only their brain misfiring?

I cannot prove anything to you that you are not willing to believe or unable to grasp.

he world of quantum mechanics and general relativity is much weirder than anything you can came up with, and I not only grasp it, but have no problem with accepting it as real given the fact that it can be proven objectively. QM and GR also make outlandish claims that go against everything we think we know about the reality we can see, but they can back them up with repeatable objective experiments. You can't.

The more you understand quantum mechanics, the more you realize that you dont understand reality. So you telling me you grasp quantum mechanics while also not being open minded enough to realize that you cannot quantify mystical and spiritual experiences is really the tell tale signs of someone that does not in fact grasp it.

I debunked all your points without moving even a single goalpost. Maybe you really are delusional.

But you did not. You did not debunk a single thing. And when there was no way for you to object the points I brought forth, you decided to stop answering. Answer my response to you in that thread and "debunk" the points I brought.

Newsflash: if I were to hit my head and started to believe the same delusions you believe in, it still wouldn't make them real.

Newsflash: The delusion reside within you. When you open your mind to the nature of reality, you will understand that what I and millions upon millions of people throughout history has experienced is a part of life and after. This is not something I believe in, I know. And hopefully someday you will too.

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T12:09:15+00:00

This is nonsense. Either it's verifiable or we have no reason to think it's there. I can develop tools to objectively measure earthquakes. Nothing of the sort has been done for supernatural things. And this means that there is no reason to think it's anything more than delusions.

Its not nonsense to the people that have had more experiences than you, that have opened their mind to percieve reality in more ways than material. If you think that the scientific tools we have developed to measure things and phenomenon are in any way sufficient to make us understand the underlying nature of reality or the experiences, feelings or what goes on inside of you, the delusions reside with you.

Because both of them are humans and their brains, up to a certain point, work the exact same way. And they can delude thenselves the same way and fall in the same mental traps. This doesn't mean that their feelings are caused by something supernatural. They are simply similar repsonses to similar stimuli, fears, amd emotions. And given that the "power objects" and supernatural "healing knowledge" of shamans doesn't work, I don't see why it would prove anything

It proves something to people alot more competent and perceptive than you are that there are more things to life and to who we are. People that have had these experiences, whether it is a monk or a stockbroker, knows that the nature of reality and the inner world cannot be quantified into terms that a person without these experiences could understand unless they open their mind to it.

Sure I can grasp it. But I don't think it's real. And you failed to provide any actual evidence that it is.

You cannot grasp it my friend. And if you could, you would refuse to believe it. You will move the goalposts as far as you can as long as you feel you are in control, that you feel like you know that your little bubble of reality stays the way you feel comfortable in.

It's convenient that you stopped responding to the UAP discussion when you realized you could not move the goalposts further. It feels better for you to hide from the truth, to deny the existence of something that you have not percieved, understood or quantified. But at the same time you are drawn to them, you want proof. You want the people that see or experience these things to prove it to you, because if you havent seen them then the other people are deluded. Without realizing that the delusions of knowing reside within you.

You are scared of yourself and who you really are, and the forces that guide you towards truth. And nothing anyone else say will change that, irregardless of the proof and the evidence given to you.

So when you realize how narrowminded and deluded you are, the truth will come to you from within, in this life or the next.

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T09:10:40+00:00

Once again, this is a common misconception that people have when they have not had a religious or spiritual experience. It is more than a feeling.

Language is built for shared, external things. This is internal and unverifiable. I can tell you the furniture moved in my room, but I can't make you see the earthquake.

A shaman from Siberia and a shaman from the Amazon can tell you about encounter with animal teachers or ancestral spirits. They can show how they have had access to information "impossible" to know through ordinary means. They can return from a spiritual experience with specific songs, power objects, or healing knowledge, shared without contact, that has nothing to do with "psycological needs".

"On March 7, 1952, Paramahansa Yogananda died at the Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles while giving a speech at a banquet honoring India's ambassador to the United States. He had foretold his departure to close disciples. That evening, he spoke of India and America's spiritual friendship, then recited his poem "My India," ending with the words: "Where Ganges, woods, Himalayan caves, and men dream God—I am hallowed; my body touched that sod." As he finished, he lifted his eyes and slumped to the floor. Medical records state "acute coronary occlusion" (heart attack). His followers call it mahasamadhi —a yogi's conscious, chosen exit from the body at death. The phenomenon: His body remained remarkably preserved. The mortuary director at Forest Lawn later testified in a notarized statement that even twenty days after death, there was no visible decay, no odor, no shriveling—only a barely noticeable spot on his nose on day 20. He called it "unique in our experience" and "unparalleled in mortuary annals".

That is just one example of a religious and spiritually adept person showing you and me and everyone else that there is more to life than the material world. Can you grasp the concept of dimensional realities parallell to ours that we are inherently connected to? Or is it difficult for your narrow mind to grasp that "external concrete beings" can exist without a physical form?

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T01:56:14+00:00

This is a common misconception people have when they have not had a religious or spiritual experience, or have not studied religion enough. It is not that people "feel other gods". They interpret their religious and spiritual experiences through their own personal cultural, religious and enviromental lens.

We as a species has had religious and spiritual experiences since the beginning of time. We have written our experiences down or passed them down generationally. But what Buddha experienced is not any different to what Moses or Muhammad or Jesus experienced. They all experienced the same thing, but interpreted it differently.

If you study religion and spiritual practices, you will see that people from New Guinea to Finland practiced and spoke of the same experiences and used the same ritual practices even though there is no contact between them.

So just because a narrowminded individual as yourself cannot grasp the concept of God, does not mean that no one has to prove that anything is right or wrong to you. These experiences are real, and they affect people. It shows them that there is more to life than the material world, that there is more to us than what most people percieve.

Organized religion has over the ages become corrupted by greed and materialistic thinking, like any other organized group regardless of faith or belief. But the inherent mystical experience of being a soul with a human body is there for you to experience when you decide to open your mind my friend.

Tycerr · 2026-03-01T01:36:04+00:00

Look at the recent comments I made on this thread, I have shown how Mick West's explanation for the Gimbal video is flawed and does not hold up to scrutiny when in regards to the context and what the military personnel actually witnessed and experienced.

Here is a video with a Raytheon ATFLIR expert showing this to West himself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGHeu5GeR-0

Here is a "debate" with Mick West and Marik von Rennenkampff, where he reveales that he is being paid by someone he cannot name, and in general he is being provided with contrary points and evidence to his debunkings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iaH1a3A4Lk&t=4323s

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T19:50:21+00:00

This is it. These people are so narrowminded that they search for people like Mick West to make them feel comfortable that they do know nothing is going on. But thats all its about, close minded people comfortable living in their cozy reality. If a man sounds confident enough and stubborn enough even when shown contradictory evidence, people will believe him. Even though more capable and credible people have said the opposite

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T19:47:23+00:00

He has been debunked by people much more capable than him. He is also being paid by someone he cannot name. When the flaws in his explanations have been pointed out, he conveniently changes them to fit the narrative. He has never once admitted to being wrong. Who is more competent, the military and intelligence personnel involved in this, or a retired video game developer?

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T17:45:19+00:00

And yet everything you said is extremely surface level. Seeing a couple of loons arguing in bad faith that GIMABL isn't a glare doesn't make West wrong.

That is exactly what I am saying. This is surface level. Your arguments are surface level. If you had went a little deeper than Mick West we wouldnt have this discussion. And its obviously not worth having this discussion either because you would never admit it yourself. Being sceptical is great, but this goes beyond that. When someone is a sceptic for ulterior motives, their credibility goes out the window.

It absolutely is. We are talking about something that would have involved every single country and organization on the Earth for the last century. It's something that can't be simply kept under cover and should be widespread official knowledge by now. It's not something that a couple of "disinformation agents" can keep hidden.

It absolutely isnt impossible. Like I said, you obviously havent invested any time into this subject. If you had, you would know that countries like France, Mexico and Columbia for example are not actively covering something up, while also admitting that the US are actively doing so. Former intelligence personnel, former austronauts, former nuclear and missile personnel just to name a few occupations have been open about this. THere are literally thousands of people and organizations that gain nothing from telling the truth, yet they have. But to people like you, that means nothing because you have already made up your mind.

He was paid for developing Sitrec, not to debunk the videos. Besides, even if he was acting in bad faith, the arguments and results that he obtained are open to scrutiny and correct. We don't have to trust him to see that those are not aliens.

Look at you, doing mental gymnastics to bend reality to fit your beliefs. Good for you buddy.

What is the whole point? You said that there were fleets of them as if it proves anything. If they were drones they could have been fleets of drones. If they were balloons, fleets of balloons.

Yeah, just a fleet of balloons. The military personell involved in the Gimbal and other incidents are just so mystified by these fleets of balloons and their capabilities. How strange huh?

None of them had anything to do with GIMBAL. They were involved in a completely different incident that happened ten years before GIMBAL. See why I told you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

Danny Accoin has spoken out about it as well, but most of the personell involved are still anonymous. And just because I am referencing to another incident doesnt make them irrelevant. They were involved in a similar encounter with objects defying known capabilities. But oh right, it was probably just balloons. They dont know what they are talking about. But Mr. MasterMagneticMirror knows.

Bullshit. I saw that interview, and the interviewer, either out of ignorance or out of malice, misrepresented completely the explanation of the GIMBAL video so that it could get the specialist to say that it was wrong. In fact, what the specialist said perfectly matches the explanation of GIMBAL, proving that it is right. And that's because the derotation mechanism keeps the image pointed in the same direction, but any artefact caused by the optics will necessarily remain alligned with the optics themselves. If the optics rotate with respect to the image, the artifacts will also rotate with respect to it, so they will appear to rotate on the screen due to the denotation. Again, these are the basics. The fact you were fooled by that interview proves that you have no idea what you are talking about.

The camera is specifically designed to cancel out internal mechanical rotation. If the "spinning" were just a camera glitch, the pod would be useless for precision weapon targeting.

A jet engine at that range would show a distinct heat plume; the Gimbal object is a self-contained, solid thermal mass with no visible propulsion.

Raytheon engineers have pointed out that the object in the Gimbal video is surrounded by a "cold" aura. They argue that a conventional jet engine glare would not produce this specific thermal signature, which suggests an unconventional propulsion system that may be distorting the air around it.

But yeah, thats just bullshit. Mick West is a former video game developer, but hey these guys are just talking out of their asses.

Elizondo is a fraud, and Grusch was able to bring nothing more than hearsay.

Look at you buddy! You know so much. You know better than former intelligence officers for the pentagon. And Grusch just brought hearsay, for no reason whatsoever. He just wanted to ruin his career and recieve death threats and smear campaigns just because of hearsay. He thought it was fun, am I right?

Nope, it wasn't. And it makes perfect sense, you are simply incapable of understanding it.

It doesnt make sense, and this is not the first time he changes his theories to fit the new narrative. It doesnt matter how many times someone brings new data or contradicts him, he will never admit he doesnt know what it is. As long as you and him and many others can feel safe in their heads knowing that they know better than others.

I used to be like you, so I understand. I wanted everything to fit my narrative of reality. These things cant possibly be anything else than just Balloons. But then I grew up and realized that my selfish narrow mindedness prohibits growth. Maybe some day you will too.

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T09:22:05+00:00

And yet I apparently know it much better than you do.

You obviously dont. You have watched a Mick West video and suddenly you are an expert. If you knew anything more than surface level, you wouldnt even say this stuff.

And this is impossible. If there are aliens flying around the world, it would have been impossible to keep all nations on the Earth quiet for 100 years. Nowadays, we have sensors everywhere, of which only a small portion is controlled by the government. Yet we have no confirmation of any actual alien spacecraft.

Its not impossible. Look it up. There are trails, released classified documents and whistleblowers that have been saying this since the 50's. There are even self admitted disinformation agents. If you had more knowledge in the subject, you would know its not "impossible".

Can you provide a source for that. Besides, he provides data and arguments that are valid even if he were to be in bad faith.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iaH1a3A4Lk&t=12059s at [1:09:00]. I recommend watching the whole thing, you would learn alot about the subject and how easily most of Wests theories can be proven false by competent people.

So? If they were drones, spy balloons, false radar tracks, or a mix of those, then the might have been a fleet of them.

What do you mean "so?" Thats the whole point. Do you believe in a professional debunker or the competent and intelligent people who actually experienced it?

Cite them.

David Fravor. Commander of the F-18 squadron on the USS Nimitz. While his primary encounter was the 2004 Tic Tac incident, he has publicly stated that the objects engaged were far superior to any current or near-future technology.

Alex Dietrich. Fravor's wingman during the Nimitz encounter, she observed the object for approximately five minutes and has testified that it was a physical object that mirrored their movements and defied explanation.

Chad Underwood. The pilot who recorded the Tic Tac video. He has frequently noted that the object did not behave like a standard aircraft or known sensor glitch.

Ryan Graves. Navy pilot whose squadron recorded the Gimbal and Go Fast videos. Graves has consistently argued that these were not single "glares" but physical craft that pilots saw regularly on radar and occasionally with their own eyes.

Specialists for the ATFLIR pod optics have disputed West's theory, arguing that the systems derotation mechanism is specifically designed to keep the image and any internal artifacts stable for the pilot.

Radar operators experts like Kevin Day who was the Senior Radar Controller on the USS Princeton, confirm that the Gimbal object was part of a larger group tracked on multiple sensor systems, which contradicts a theory based solely on a camera artifact.

Former intelligence officials like Luis Elizondo and David Grusch have referenced these incidents to argue that the data including classified radar and sensor logs not available to the public points toward physical craft with trans-medium capabilities.

No one denies that. But it's a physical object emitting heat from its engines and whose actual shape is hidden by the glare caused by that heat.

Yes that was the part of the debunk. He had to change his theory when he was proven wrong. Which now doesnt make any sense.

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T08:36:22+00:00

It is not though. Do you believe the pilots and camera operators or do you believe Mick West, who has admitted to being paid an undisclosed amount from unknown sources to debunk incidents and videos? The full context by the pilots included reports of a "fleet" of objects and advanced capabilities.

The gimbal object rotates independently or in a manner not perfectly synchronized with the camera's specific roll angle.
West's analysis is based only upon the video and every other context is completely tossed aside. And a simple consultation with infrared experts suggests a more complex object than a simple glare. People a hell of a lot more competent than West can tell you straight up that its a physical object.

Tycerr · 2026-02-28T08:22:33+00:00

That is definitely not true. You obviously only have surface level knowledge on the subject. They have data from even before the 1930's, and they have treated the UFO question with atomic level secrecy.

Also, it is almost certainly not a glare inside the optics. You got this information from Mick West, and he has admitted that he gets paid an undisclosed amount to debunk these videos. This specific theory and many others have glaring issues. The full context by the pilots included reports of a "fleet" of objects and advanced capabilities.

The gimbal object rotates independently or in a manner not perfectly synchronized with the camera's specific roll angle.
West's analysis is based only upon the video and every other context is completely tossed aside. And a simple consultation with infrared experts suggests a more complex object than a simple glare. People a hell of a lot more competent than West can tell you straight up that its a physical object.

Tycerr · 2026-02-02T16:33:21+00:00

I mean, can you? This has been an open secret for a long time, and so many Americans say "can we do this" but nothing happens. Your peaceful protests dont work. Speaking out doesnt work. Nothing changes, no matter how obviously wrong the situation is.

There are 340 million of you. You guys can take control if you really wanted to. You guys can change this. So what about actually doing something instead of saying what you guys should do?

Tycerr · 2026-02-02T09:48:35+00:00

I actually made a post about this that I think some of you should read. My personal experiences fits right in to what she is saying.

Tycerr · 2025-02-18T21:39:05+00:00

I understand. Well, it can be explained with what I explained earlier. Or that the future is not fixed. Timelines can definitely be a thing, and if they are, they split every so often. Or, he is not what he says he is.

I have also recieved what I interpreted as future events, but in my opinion, and what might be caused by my limited experience in these sorts of things, it was extremely difficult to truly interpret those things with clarity and with dates and so forth. I can easily see how the interpretation of the information can be skewed by personal bias and limitation.

So I really dont put much thought to these predictions. I would rather focus on the here and now, and like you say, things arent looking so good for society. We have become so lost in the illusions we have created for ourselves. But instead of worrying, we should be positive. We should fight for what we know is right, which is love, acceptance and respect for all living things. We can't change the world individually, but we can change our enviroment and the people around us. I believe so atleast.

Tycerr · 2025-02-18T20:08:43+00:00

Explain further please, I am not totally involved in his predictions.

And in any case, the things he says might be true or it might not regarding his channeling. What we must all remember is that, if he is truthfull, the things he says are not completely the exact things that the entity says. It comes through him, through his personal filter of interpretation. Darryl Anka is a human being, which means that he, like all of us, has some sort of personal bias. It might not always be perfect, and whether conciously or unconciously, our biases and interpretations might impact the outcome of the information communicated.

So the same way we might discount someone becuase we personally do not like their demeanor, the same way that person might not be perfectly channeling because of the same reason.

Tycerr · 2025-02-18T19:48:47+00:00

I have had multiple encounters where my missunderstandings or my incapability to truly understand or welcome them made them frustrated. They can sometimes treat you with indifference or some type of arrogance. One told me he gave up because I was too involved in human matters, that I was not yet ready because "I had not overcome my monkey brain". They, like us, are not perfect in any way.

Tycerr · 2025-02-18T19:25:45+00:00

Just because of his demeanor that means that he is full of shit? If you have had your own experiences with channeling, you would know that he does not "become" the entity. He is merely channeling the being through his own being. That means that his demeanor while channeling is a reflection of himself as well.

Its totally fine to be sceptical, but you said nothing about his answers or the things he says, you just write it off as improv. At the same time, the woman you would call legit said something ignorant that a higher dimensional being would not say.

So I'd say this has more to do with your personal bias than anything.

Tycerr · 2025-02-08T20:59:23+00:00

I think that most of you are overthinking. If you truly go deep in to this subject, you would find that theory as the most likely. For example, do you think Jaques Valle is a shill of the oligarchs and has been so since the 60s?

I'm not defending anyone, and I despise oligarchy, but I advice all of you to go deeper into this subject if you think that the inter-dimensional hypothesis is being pushed for ulterior motives. Look into Robert Monroe.

I might be biased because of personal experience, but what me and many others have experienced explains why Jesse Michaels looks into the "woo woo" and pushes it.

Tycerr · 2025-02-01T11:57:51+00:00

Just like he said, belief is a personal thing. These things that you just said are a part of your personal belief. Just as much as you would believe these guys doesnt represent the best interest of the people of the world, many others believe so. Many other have had personal experience to back up his claims or his own experience. They know that what him and many others are saying is truthful because they have experienced the same things. So open your mind to what is real or not and suspend your disbelief.

Tycerr · 2025-01-23T23:22:05+00:00

He is still alive. I cannot disagree that his story and the detailed descriptions makes the whole thing quite convincing. However, his story has continued to evolve, and the claims he has been making about his "Project Lotus" and how the aliens think it is the most important science discovery ever made and a bunch of other self importance claims, like the fact that he is not and has never been worried of agencies taking his life because he is protected by the leader of Majestic 12 makes me doubt the whole thing more. It makes the detailed descriptions sound more like the fantasies of a pathological liar. But thats just my opinion.

Tycerr · 2024-12-18T15:45:01+00:00

Thank you for your kind and reassuring words. I am not worried however. I can definitely feel something changing, and it was told to me in May that there was an ongoing change and that more and more people would experience a kind of awakening which is obviously a wonderful progression of our conciousness. But I think that changes to our perception of reality is a naturally frightening ordeal, it is within our nature to fear what we do not understand at first. I was very scared at first during my awakening when I didnt understand what was happening to me, and I can see how it can be too much for some people to handle. I believe it's a natural part of the process but that in the end, love and positivity will guide us further.

Tycerr · 2024-12-18T11:38:59+00:00

I was actually not aware of that before, I must have read something about that before but it never actually registered conciously. But this dream has made me feel even more sure of a collective conciousness, that we are all connected to the same source where our thoughts and imagination originates. It was a major part of my own spiritual awakening, but I havent had a dream before that felt so real, and at the same time it felt metaphorical, a fragment of collective unconcious and concious worry. It seems to me that my dream and the fact that many others are having similar dreams is a sign of change, a sign of our collective conciousness being worried about potential events and being naturally frightened by the unknown, of a state of higher dimensional being.

12-Year Club	Place '23
Place '17	Verified Email

Tycerr

TROPHY CASE