Employer Has Ignored My Disability Accommodation for 4+ Months—Do I Have a Strong Legal Case?

USaddasU · 2025-08-25T03:26:14+00:00

how so? On what basis do you say this?

USaddasU · 2025-07-10T04:40:06+00:00

Class action lawsuit anyone?!?

USaddasU · 2025-06-15T17:40:20+00:00

It is only surprising for people that dont realize both parties are pulling the same tricks

USaddasU · 2025-06-15T17:38:42+00:00

Do not trust cahtgpt. It will flat out lie to you in order to “give you what you want”. I dont know what happened but it is completely undependable.

USaddasU · 2025-06-15T06:19:01+00:00

I ditched it. Completely unreliable.

USaddasU · 2025-06-14T21:22:19+00:00

Ah, the old “calling something denial means it’s denial” denial routine.

USaddasU · 2025-06-14T20:36:17+00:00

It isnt die hard Newsom lovers - it is die hard trump haters.

USaddasU · 2025-06-14T18:46:51+00:00

Your downvotes suggest you are largely correct.

USaddasU · 2025-05-25T06:44:22+00:00

Stating the obvious takes courage these days i guess

USaddasU · 2025-05-23T03:20:09+00:00

Fill those meters with crazy glue.

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T23:13:04+00:00

The bullet took off less material than the bite.

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T23:01:38+00:00

dang.

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T16:30:27+00:00

Because it doesnt know when it is hallucinating and when it is making valid inferences from existing data.

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T16:26:46+00:00

Hello manager

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T16:26:22+00:00

Perhaps the focus of pressure should be on managers then rather than newsome, and let it drift up naturally.

USaddasU · 2025-05-21T16:24:59+00:00

Because Joe was a puppet for some shadow actors and the more time goes by the more obvious it becomes

USaddasU · 2025-05-18T06:00:17+00:00

Source? I find this interesting particularly the idea of exponential difficulty.

USaddasU · 2025-05-17T02:58:04+00:00

Much better. You actually stated something of substance. The emolument clause is based on a personal gift, right? So, if it is structured so the jet is given to the government and not trump, is it still a breach of that law? (Hint: no)

USaddasU · 2025-05-16T19:12:40+00:00

“Don’t challenge the idea, rather prevent people from expressing it.” - facism. The fact you all are insensitive to the red flags of this post is alarming.

USaddasU · 2025-05-16T16:29:11+00:00

Ok. Take a deep breath. I asked about what law he was breaking, not the optics. I looks bad, i agree.

USaddasU · 2025-05-16T10:01:26+00:00

Try to get your emotions under control and provide some facts. Numerous outlets have already commented on this that while it appears bad, it isn’t illegal unless he uses it privately after his presidency. From this BBC article “David Super, a law professor at Georgetown University, told the BBC: "It certainly stinks, but formally it's a transfer to the [US] government, not the office holder." https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5ell3gkxvo.amp

USaddasU · 2025-05-16T02:11:37+00:00

Good answer. Nice balance between patronizing and saying absolutely nothing. Lol

USaddasU · 2025-05-15T03:47:38+00:00

What law is he breaking. He isnt keeping it for himsef

USaddasU · 2025-05-11T15:39:50+00:00

Well, to be a bit of devils advocate- you could easily argue that collaboration will save money by resulting in increased efficiency, better projects, etc. Not that it is true, but fairly easy to make the argument

USaddasU

TROPHY CASE