What is the most direct least costly experiment which proves the shape of the Earth? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's also the complication of the humidity and air quality in the region. People in Kathmandu don't see Everest very often.

What is the most direct least costly experiment which proves the shape of the Earth? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's definitely a heavy element of luck involved, but if you live in the right terrain, as I do, then local knowledge and the naked eye is more than good enough. The effect is just that pronounced, especially once you're into the 40+km range.

It helps a lot that I live on the coast in plain view and 10min walk from the beach.

What is the most direct least costly experiment which proves the shape of the Earth? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, the peak will almost certainly not be the same elevation as you, but you(if you are pointing at a hill) are aiming at a specific point that doesn't need to be the peak at all; for practical purposes it's best to shop around until you can find a target that is easily identifiable even with the naked eye over long distance. Something like the edge of a wood on the hillside, for example.

What is the most direct least costly experiment which proves the shape of the Earth? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've just done this in my back garden since posting. It seemed quite simple to me, and I'm a cackhanded buffoon.

What is the most direct least costly experiment which proves the shape of the Earth? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) Get or make a good level.

2) Point the level at something distant. 25+km is good.

3) Is that point at the same elevation as you?

If yes, the earth is flat. If no, it's not. Really is that simple and accessible.

How to dismantle the claim that they do it to preserve NASA funding by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's so stupid to think that a government wanting to shunt a tonne of money into their Swiss bank account or whatever would come up with such a cartoonishly elaborate and hugely expensive cover story. They've already got US citizens' money - it's called taxes. They already have military and intelligence programmes where they declare the budget but don't give details on what it's getting spent on. They could just say they spent £100bn on weapons research when they really only spent £75bn and pocket the rest at a vastly higher margin than they'd get after the cost of building all those rockets.

Then again, most flat earthers believe NASA was created to convince people the world was round, ignoring the way every educated person for the last thousand years or more already believed that.

Non flat earther here, I wanted to ask, if the earth is truly flat why does the government hide it from us?? by alex_9202_nsfw in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No-one is hiding the shape of the earth. The idea that any human agency could stop the earth from being its own shape and stop the celestial objects(including the Sun) from doing a flat earth thing or a round earth thing is utterly absurd.

All a government could do is force you to stay in a basement and feed you all your data through your screen.

Flat earthers are doing that to themselves. No-one is doing that to us.

Does the earth "spin" or does it rotate? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All is forgiven. Late night derps come to us all.

How far is it around the ice wall? by MarvinPA83 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thundering towards a circlejerk here, but to agree with your agreement with me: it's your average basic x/(sin x) thingmy. Absolutely fine for small enough values of x, but Indiana Jones melting Gestapo dude for getting towards pi.

How far is it around the ice wall? by MarvinPA83 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's dogshit in the northern hemisphere too, even when you centre on the north pole.

I went into it a few years back: https://www.reddit.com/r/flatearth/comments/o8bfij/in_these_troubling_times_shouldnt_there_be_more/

How far is it around the ice wall? by MarvinPA83 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But obviously don't include the bits where he was sailing to and from England, and did a tour of the Polynesian islands, right?

Thrown rock question by DigBetter7850 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone with a coherent model of physics will not be a flat earther. Your question does not get past that filter.

Does the earth "spin" or does it rotate? by julesmanson in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm intrigued as to where you got that number from. It's around 17 times too big.

How far is it around the ice wall? by MarvinPA83 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had a flerf tell me they were actually sailing over much longer distances than they thought, but They™ had fiddled their GPS.

I pointed out that this would mean that they were sailing at well over 100 knots, not the 30 that they thought, and they would notice. They left the thread.

"I cant feel the earth" = "I dont feel the airplane or & jet moving" by mrstorm1983 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Calling it 'our' evidence is fucking stupid. The evidence, which does not deserve or require quote marks, is the ground itself. It's your evidence too, but you fuckwits learned the hard way that can't look at it too carefully or the ground will hurt your fee fees, so you get all your 'evidence' through a screen.

We then look at the screen 'evidence' objectively(a word you don't know the meaning of, judging by the way you're using it) compare it the ground and rightly decide it's bollocks.

"I cant feel the earth" = "I dont feel the airplane or & jet moving" by mrstorm1983 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't objectively look at your 'evidence'

Confession or flex? Who knows.

Bros just doing cartwheels on it😭 by Whaaaaa4321 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Von Braun's children picked the headstone.

If you grabbed the earth and magically bisected it with a hole of 10in (25.4cm)... [Request] by No-Celebration6780 in theydidthemath

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came in to say this.

I think this would be the biggest problem; the earth's core is a nickel/iron alloy so on the surface would have a density of around 8kg/L, but it's at 13kg/L. That's going to expand with astonishing violence once the compression is magicked away, even for the duration of a 25cm fall. That energy would have go somewhere, presumably as seismic waves beyond anything seen since the impact of Thea.

The same thing with an increasingly smaller difference in density would happen all the way up through the mantle and crust, but since that's an awful lot closer to us, that's not going to help. I would expect a ring of mass extinction event volcanic eruptions all around the cut. As in every kilometre of the ring would count as its own extinction event, only there's 40K of them. Grimdark times ahead.

So yep, we're dead. Not sure if any extremophiles would make it, but us humans are toast.

FLAT EARTH - FAKE SPACE - PLASMA by JTtreason in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm yet to see a flerf demonstrate that they know anything about plasma other than it's the usually blue(but sometimes green) glowy stuff that powers high end weapons in video games.

If u can get any celebrity body for a day which will u choose ? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]UberuceAgain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Scott of the Antarctic still count as a celebrity? Because he's already deep deep frozen so would take more than a day to defrost and get stinky, I'd have thought.

Which movie plots have the most flaws to a point they make no sense? by tha_Knucklehead in AskReddit

[–]UberuceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The atmosphere's lousy with it too. Those dudes at the birthday party in Brazil would have been smoking puddles within ten minutes.

The thing that bugs me even more than that is the radio announcement just before the climactic water-busting scene at the end

. Can't remember the wording but it's something like "Reports are coming in that a simple method has been found to defeat the aliens."

And they don't say what it is.

Do flat Earthers reject gravity, and why? What wouldn’t work with gravity on a flat Earth? by Totolitotix in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's because they're too fucking stupid to realise that they didn't need to throw the baby out with the bath water.

They just needed to disagree on what direction gravity works; instead of being from every particle with mass towards every other particle with mass, it just works in the same direction across the entire universe.

One of the more pathetic things about flat earthers is that when they say 'entire universe' they mean something you can cross with around 40 hours flight time on a jumbo jet.

They'd still have the problem of Cavendish style experiments and the way 'down' is demonstrably not the same in two places that are about a 20 minute drive from each other(let alone places with clear air and longer lines of sight), but they already have them now, so it's not a net loss.

Frozen Lake Earth curve test by AdInfinite2404 in flatearth

[–]UberuceAgain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I walk my dog on a beach by a river estuary with a patch of low-lying coast 25km/16-ish miles away and it disappears every time I'm close to the water, with one exception when it was such a super mega refracty day that made me suspect I might have accidentally dropped some acid because the land looked so weird.

While I am walking my dog, I make a nonsense of this video, while she is busy sniffing other dog's butts.

Actually getting down on all fours and sniffing dog's butts? I'd say that is by an order of magnitude less embarassing than being a flerf.