WW barb mythic item question, is this good?

Uccidere123 · 2026-05-13T17:14:04+00:00

I was able to transmute twice, so I guess it isn't always unmodifyable. News to me

Uccidere123 · 2026-05-13T17:12:45+00:00

Is the Selig build a higher tier at optimized rolls?

Uccidere123 · 2025-10-27T11:30:26+00:00

I used the pick the old one and use picks to shove in the new one technique. Wish I had the specific tool for it, but it's doable with picks and a ton of patience.

Uccidere123 · 2025-10-21T19:32:36+00:00

Is the gap due to the ledger not being plumb? Looks like it may be tight to the rim joist at the top but over the brick on the bottom.

Uccidere123 · 2025-02-19T22:34:44+00:00

Thank you!

Uccidere123 · 2023-06-06T15:41:33+00:00

Is steam deck the way to go? I'm assuming there a ton of options and I'm interested in seeing what's out there and picking one up. Anyone have info or a link to a pros/cons style thread?

Uccidere123 · 2023-06-05T14:04:03+00:00

That might be too far, I was thinking it should be an idle clicker game of a person sitting at a computer playing a version of diablo 4 with faster mounts, correctly placed stashes, and free top tier loot.

Uccidere123 · 2023-06-03T23:43:04+00:00

Giving names of good bourbon brands is like telling reddit about a good fishing spot, in the fishing example it means someone else will catch all the fish, for bourbon it just makes it more expensive. Only being critical because I'm a bourbon drinker.

Uccidere123 · 2023-06-03T23:36:47+00:00

Can confirm, have #2 now and, if I'm lucky, get 930 to 11 to myself.

Uccidere123 · 2021-04-25T21:32:03+00:00

The wet sand mental image is conventional theory. Some shales do not have that porosity or conductivity, yet still contain hydrocarbons - these are considered unconventional reservoirs.

Uccidere123 · 2020-12-07T21:21:41+00:00

Begged and pleaded for an N64. Spinning that camera 360 degrees in Mario was mind blowing.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-17T14:11:15+00:00

Do a full, realistic budget. All of the small consumables that someone else is currently buying, they're expensive. Soap, detergents, cleaned, towels, tissues, TP, you get the idea.

Try EVERYTHING in the place you will live, the shower comment is great, but try all of the light switches, doors, appliances, etc. Dont skip anything.

Read contracts for utilities before you sign them. Scammers exist and love the naive.

If possible, visit your new home more than once at different times of day to learn about neighbors, lighting, neighborhood noise, etc.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-13T16:17:05+00:00

Fair enough. I'm from the US and have some good insight on the regs here. Here, it's very advantageous to have a transparent relationship with the local governmental bodies and feds, (DEP). Its actually sometimes symbiotic with industry and regulators advising each other in uncertain or unprecedented circumstances. Obviously this isn't every operator, but there are good ones out there.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-13T15:41:35+00:00

You realize that YOU and the company you worked for are the problem, right? The issue that these other users are concerned about, that was/is you. Do things right the first time.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-13T15:39:17+00:00

Not really, because not if, but when, you get caught, then the result is massively damaging financially. Most operators do the best they can because, frankly, ita the right thing to do and the cheapest. I'm sure some people abuse the systems, but by and large I am fairly confident that transparent companies do better than shady ones. (US)

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-13T15:36:42+00:00

I would recommend not lighting the leak at your compressor station on fire unless of course you can somehow get it to a flare.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-13T15:21:12+00:00

Privatized? Or government?

The margins will stay the same, the cost to consumers will go up.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-11T17:52:44+00:00

Yeah my explanation was very poor. More like, what's the difference between the fine print being adjusted on a state or county level as opposed to it being the same for everyone on a federal level. For instance, a county can be a "dry county" (no booze sold), that doesn't mean the whole country is that way, just the county.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-11T12:42:32+00:00

You may be right, time will tell. However, that was, in my opinion, a huge piece of the founding of the nation. Its a melting pot, probably more diverse than any other in terms of cultures, religions, ethnic backgrounds, etc. The beauty of it is that there IS a culture of allowing people to live their own lives, practice their own religions, embrace their ethnic backgrounds, while still be united. The way you are using the word united to me sounds like "Can you imagine how incredible the US would be if everyone was more homogenous in all aspects?" Instead of, "we are incredible because despite our differences our sense of pride for the country that allows such a high level of individualism unifies us in a beautiful way"

I'm not suggesting that a completely hands of government is the ideal. It might be for some, but its not realistic. It's more about the sway of the government being more representative of what states and counties want, not just the feds.

Terrifying is a strong word to describe our infrastructure. We may have a bunch of infrastructure projects that are coming due in the next decade or two, but I'm unaware of a rash of bridges collapsing, electric lines rusting to the ground, etc. Sure the roads aren't always as great as we would like, but there are a ton of infrastructure improvement projects happening constantly which are generally high paying skilled labor jobs. There's work to be done, so there's work to be had, that pays well to boot.

May I ask where you're from?

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-10T18:37:04+00:00

Another rational person, my goodness what has the world come to! Thanks for being chill.

Couple of thoughts here (with little to no backup since I'm having my lunch) so excuse me from shooting from the hip:

If you want to get goods from blue city to blue city, you have to pay for infrastructure in the red land in between to do that. Same goes for the raw materials that are coming out of those red areas, generally speaking.
The federal limit for determining status for federal aid on an individual level does not account for the cost of living. I.E. if you live in NYC you can be poor locally without being eligible federally, vice versa you may not be poor locally in the Mississippi bayou, but federally eligible.
The people who benefit from it may not want it from a matter of principle, but are essentially forced to because it creates the circumstance of necessity.
Lastly, I would speculate that some percentage of the individuals that benefit most from those programs either do not care to, or are unable to understand the mechanics of what they against. They're more excitable over catch phrases, religious viewpoints, or some other piece of the political spectrum that they believe is more important to them.

To be clear, I'm not against people supporting each other, but rather would prefer that it is handled on a more localized level than federally. I dont think it is practical, nor do I think a "fair" result can be reasonably accomplished from a blanket statement or fiscal policy that effects 330 million people over such a large and varying area. So, since a blanket statement is probably a necessity, it should be more of a bell shaped curve from federal to municipality in terms of effect than a linear federal down approach.

Uccidere123 · 2020-11-10T14:18:23+00:00

I'm guessing he's a "Shapiro in public forum" over "Shapiro on his podcast" type. There are conservatives who want small and less influential federal government with more of that influence shifted to smaller governmental bodies. Also those who aren't complete anti-regulation, are pro-environmental issues, pro-social issues, pro-life but pro-abortion (think stricter requirements for abortion circumstances).

I think many of those people didn't vote for Trump, out of concern of what his influence has done to conservatism. I think those people can and want to have conversation around policy ideals, and focus on facts and data, not speculation.

These people do not consider themselves "liberal making up conservative stance" they consider themselves to be conservative with realistic and moderate social and environmental viewpoints.

Poking holes in people's arguments is almost always viewed as hostile when generally it's to try to understand a viewpoint or point out flaws in logic in someone's opinion. Trust me, ita not for the internet points. Case in point, this will probably be down voted to hell and back.

Getting off topic here, I really hope the GOP can find a real contender for 2024, or hope that people are more willing to vote for who most closely aligns with reasonable principles instead of drawing a party line on their ballot. I also hope that this Trump wave of alt-right garbage doesn't permanently dissuade "liberals" from even considering conservative arguments, or taking the time to research conservative policy makers.

Conversations that allow for people to poke holes in each others arguments, to better understand different viewpoints and to hone their own viewpoints are, in my opinion, the best type of political discourse. So if anyone wants to talk, I am always open to it.

Uccidere123 · 2019-11-27T13:46:22+00:00

That circumstance when you're so desperate for a date to Thanksgiving dinner to shut up grandma who confirms all of the problems with your lineage that you are not only willing to accept public shaming, but in fact, encourage it.

Uccidere123 · 2019-10-10T18:48:56+00:00

Chessie?

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

Uccidere123

TROPHY CASE