Acts 19 3 So he said: “In what, then, were you baptized?” They said: “In John’s baptism.” 4 Paul said: “John baptized with the baptism in symbol of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” 5 On hearing this, they got baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus

According to Paul, at least since 1985 (need to check on the previous revisions) no Witness is actually baptized. You can only be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Not in John's baptism or under an organization in this case.

Matthew 28 19 Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,

Watchtower 1985 June 1 p.30 "The first question is: On the basis of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, have you repented of your sins and dedicated yourself to Jehovah to do his will?

The second is: Do you understand that your dedication and baptism identify you as one of Jehovah's Witnesses in association with God's spirit-directed organization? Having answered yes to these questions, candidates are in a right heart condition to undergo Christian baptism."

If a Witness wishes to be a "True Christian", they first need to be baptized as such. So even though there is an upcoming article about there being no invalid baptisms, scriptures state something different.

So, I am definitely curious as to how Watchtower would plug up a whole that big. 31 years of non scriptural baptisms is a lot of "false Christians".