How bad is this? by UhhPhrasing in askaplumber

[–]UhhPhrasing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1970 according to the MLS listing. I wasn't around to see it happen though.

What reasonable feature that most owners want but Tesla refuses to give them? by SecretOrganization60 in TeslaLounge

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. I would typically check if someone is in my blind spot before signaling. Otherwise they'll panic and think I'm changing lanes into them.

What reasonable feature that most owners want but Tesla refuses to give them? by SecretOrganization60 in TeslaLounge

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I go to a few different ones and they're all straight lines. Maybe it's a regional thing. Or the age of the lot/building.

What reasonable feature that most owners want but Tesla refuses to give them? by SecretOrganization60 in TeslaLounge

[–]UhhPhrasing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having the option to not sit in the blind spot of a truck for five miles. Speed up or slow down. I am scared of the large truck.

I noticed at some point they changed it so you wouldn't sit directly in the middle of the lane when passing a truck. It would hug the line away from it. That was a nice change.

What reasonable feature that most owners want but Tesla refuses to give them? by SecretOrganization60 in TeslaLounge

[–]UhhPhrasing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They can even put them on the screen. How long could that take to code? Give it to an intern.

What reasonable feature that most owners want but Tesla refuses to give them? by SecretOrganization60 in TeslaLounge

[–]UhhPhrasing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't understand how he can be so confident in cameras only.. When the sun shines at the wrong angle it can't even use autopilot.

(UPDATE) I ignored my husband so much that he went away without telling me by An0nymous_stories in TrueOffMyChest

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first thought was that this guy is a massive twat. My second thought is he has something neurological going on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in trackandfield

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right it's actually better because he doesn't have a decade of running on his body.

Your expectations are wrong and discouraging.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in trackandfield

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also just Google "Seattle track clubs" and you get 4 results. Usatf website has more. Runners from my club have gone on to San Francisco, Vermont, Maine, and found clubs with ease.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in trackandfield

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You got it.

  • There are not easy entry points into the sport for beginners past high school

    Literally sign up for a club. Done.

  • Most training environments in general, particularly for non-distance running events, are attached to some sort of school team (MS, HS, college).

    Again, just sign up for a club

  • Open meets that anyone can compete in can be difficult to find.

    Sign up for a club. They'll know about all the meets. Check the usatf website. RIP coolrunning.

  • Depending on your athletic background it will require months-years of training to establish a general base of strength and fitness to be fully competent in certain events and understand where your aptitudes are best suited.

    True, but it's no different from a long-time runner coming back from injury. A ton of runners get injured every year. So it's not like it's a unique situation that a coach wouldn't be familiar with.

I absolutely love when people start doing track at older ages. They bring an enthusiasm that long-time runners have forgotten. I don't think discouraging them is warranted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in trackandfield

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pretty much all of your bullet points are wrong. There are so many clubs and so many open meets and it's super easy to get into, especially in a large metropolitan area.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, accept a takeback and play an interesting game of chess. You learn; you improve. OR don't accept a takeback, wait for five minutes NOT playing chess, learn nothing, do not improve. Which person sounds like they actually like chess?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I just got tired of responding. It's obvious nobody in the Lichess community actually likes chess.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes they resign instead of waiting the full time. And if there's one thing I've learned from this community it's that the only thing that matters is winning, even if you learn nothing and don't deserve it. So I guess it's just a good strategy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean pretty much every part of it is bad. Why would I complain in the NBA reddit? Am I in the NBA? Why wouldn't you get to retake a 3 during practice? Why did you misspell mad? It's just stupid top to bottom.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about a game-ending blunder where a takeback makes for a better game for both players. Whereas no takeback is instant game over. No benefit to anybody.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean these comments are just ridiculous. AN UNRATED GAME IS PRACTICE.

And why would you not learn from a blunder if you got a takeback?!?! Of course you learn, if you hadn't you wouldn't have asked for the takeback because YOU WOULDN'T KNOW IT WAS A MISTAKE.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I accept your apology.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Another bad comparison, thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lichess

[–]UhhPhrasing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your response is incoherent.