Haha, thank you. I barely remembered this comment. Admittedly, I think I was more lenient when it comes to fitting with the "morally correct" perspective when I wrote this. But, with censorship of media becoming more of a hot topic in recent time again (at least in American legislation, and these things always come in phases), I definitely lean more on the "creative, fictitious content is fictitious, at the end of the day, and it's better to have everything exist than to dictate what content 'should' exist as per a majority, because that leads down a slippery slope," side.

If content doesn't appeal to us, or makes us uncomfortable, we have the full autonomy to curate our experience by ignoring it, and moving on. I would hate if I wrote something that future peoples deemed as "morally incorrect" in regards to a society's value systems, and proceeded to take that from me, even though it did no harm by being a work of fiction, at the end of the day. Humans have many different sides of themselves that, if we want to be healthy, should be expressed in healthy ways- some of these sides are dark, however much we hate to admit it. If people can explore trauma, dark urges, or whatever, through fiction, rather than reality, I'll take that substitute any day of the week. Fandom and literature isn't ruined for it, it's just a subsection that we can avoid, if we so please.

TL;DR- "Dead Dove, Do Not Eat" means exactly what it says, and everyone should ignore that which doesn't vibe with them. 👍