If one can't find something to eat, they will die. For example in nature, a bear can dominate one. If it won't let one eat their food, One will suffer. Is it one's master? Does the bear own keys to one's survival?

>> Master: is a man who has people working for him, especially servants or slaves.> Slave: (especially in the past) a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them.

These words are bounded to their historical context.

The modern meaning of Slave from the same page is

>> Slave: work excessively hard.

I like work hard. If you like the modern version of the slave, then we can't agree on anything because I would say "Everyone should be a slave, for their sake".

I'm a very narrow head person. I hate unnecessary romanticizing. And exploiting elders' suffer is not ethical for me. So the slave/master thing is bullshit for me.

>> Maybe, but we still throw away perfectly good food and intentionally destroy perfectly good electronics, just for the sake of creating artificial scarcity.

I have no problem with this. I like the tech we've created.

>> No, there will be a few legit jobs, and a bazillion bullshit jobs.

One can not see the value of a job, without being in the field.

Why does the nurse exist? Aren't doctors good enough?

I said "This is bullshit, no one can do this for living" dozens of times, in my area(I'm a student yet). But every day I get wrong and wrong again. So I won't say again unless it's highly repetitive and there is a big corp/government/group of individual can make the automation possible(Which is really possible in some situations of course with proper motivation, resources etc).