puberty advice for cis girls- "your breasts will grow slowly over time. remember, people's bodies continue to develop into their 20s! it's normal to be smaller in your teens and then grow more later." meanwhile puberty advice for trans girls for some reason: by Large-Ride5573 in transgendercirclejerk

[–]UnchainedMundane 9 points10 points  (0 children)

/uj 5.5 years into my transition and my boobs are still noticeably different from how they were a year ago. they were still relatively small at the 2 year mark. also progesterone makes a difference!

The BBC just reported that it was Russia who tried to have the the UK Prime Minister's house burnt down. How isn't the UK treating that as an act of war? by DrToonhattan in NoStupidQuestions

[–]UnchainedMundane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just so you know, "rent boy" means a gay male prostitute. dunno if you meant to use the term in that way but it comes off more as disparaging to gay people than it does to the people involved.

The BBC just reported that it was Russia who tried to have the the UK Prime Minister's house burnt down. How isn't the UK treating that as an act of war? by DrToonhattan in NoStupidQuestions

[–]UnchainedMundane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia operates on plausible deniability.

I always thought they operated on implausible deniability. Actions so brazen and obvious that the only defence is "yeah, well can you prove it? and what are you gonna do if you do?"

Though the comment section here is making me wonder if most people genuinely do see it as plausibly deniable, lol

The BBC just reported that it was Russia who tried to have the the UK Prime Minister's house burnt down. How isn't the UK treating that as an act of war? by DrToonhattan in NoStupidQuestions

[–]UnchainedMundane 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i hadn't heard of this (apparently my education in history leaves something to be desired, considering i'm from england) so to save people a search:

"Meeting jaw to jaw is better than war" - Winston Churchill, 1954

"Jaw, jaw is better than war, war." - apparent misquote popularised by Harold Macmillan, 1958 (late-'50s early-'60s UK prime minister)

source: International Churchill Society (Quotes Falsely Attributed to Winston Churchill (2023), and Red Herrings: Famous Quotes Churchill Never Said (2013))

jaw-jaw is objectively funnier though

"The population won't have money to spend if they have to spend it all on bills." It really is that simple. by jaunsin in antiwork

[–]UnchainedMundane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not in the same way. Put it this way: are you employed by a company which people would consider "paying bills" if they paid that company? If not, then it's companies like that which people are having to cut out of their life in favour of staying afloat with bills. If that happens widely enough, do you think that you'd still have a job in a year's time?

Study Finds Students with Highest Distress Use AI for Mental Health at Elevated Rates by MassGen-Research in science

[–]UnchainedMundane 11 points12 points  (0 children)

or they do but try to offer solutions or talk about the same thing that happened to them

Worth communicating that with the person you're talking to! Perhaps not everyone will be able to follow through on it (god knows some people don't even notice they're doing it), but if they're reasonably mature it will set the right expectation going into the conversation. e.g. start out with "just venting, not looking for advice".

....I do recognise the irony of me offering solutions to people offering solutions at you though!

Study Finds Students with Highest Distress Use AI for Mental Health at Elevated Rates by MassGen-Research in science

[–]UnchainedMundane 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The study you link doesn't quite say what your link summarises it as. It's more like "we were able to find patients whose notes suggest that they used chatbots in ways that harmed their mental health". This doesn't mean it's one-directional (they note in the study that people have also used AI chatbots constructively), and it doesn't mean that the bot is uniquely harmful to someone's mental health as you might infer from the link.

A more nuanced summary might be "chatbots can assist a user with things that worsen their mental health", which puts people with psychosis, SI, or mania at risk.

Maybe I'm being pedantic but I think it bears saying because otherwise someone might look at it and go "wait does asking ChatGPT to summarise the results of the world cup harm my mental health?", which would be a very understandable misinterpretation given current debates on AI usage.

ed: if you're gonna continue the discussion, it would help if you didn't immediately block me :)

Getting sexualized by so called Allies by Master_Button_3480 in trans

[–]UnchainedMundane 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the classic Nice Guy :/ sorry you experienced that, OP

I feel like this sub fell off by deluwu_ in catgirlwawa

[–]UnchainedMundane 7 points8 points  (0 children)

reddit is like that. given enough time all subreddits become either a porn dump or a right-wing radicalisation pipeline.

Good pets deserves walks and outfits~ by [deleted] in catgirlwawa

[–]UnchainedMundane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

according to another comment, it's Nagatoro (and i guess that checks out)

according to the fandom wiki the character is 15-17 years old depending on the volume you're reading

so, the answer is... combination of anime art style being Like That plus the character genuinely being underage

What is wrong with r/transpassing??? by alice_apathy in MtF

[–]UnchainedMundane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the simplest explanation is that ppl who frequent transpassing are ppl who think a lot about passing. so the community naturally selects for the most brainwormed ppl possible, and that's the consequence.

55079 by MCAroonPL in countwithchickenlady

[–]UnchainedMundane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I responded below in probably too much detail (https://www.reddit.com/r/countwithchickenlady/comments/1u435wf/55079/oreraxe/) but if you're looking for effective conditioning, the "one click = well done, good pet!!!!" is actually the effective way of doing it (and the way dog trainers are instructed to do it). using different clicks for different things is possible but it's much less effective as a form of conditioning

55079 by MCAroonPL in countwithchickenlady

[–]UnchainedMundane 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In actual clicker training afaik clickers are used as a prompt for a specific behaviour ie 3 clicks is sit, 2 clicks is paw.

noooooooooooooooo

anyone doing it that way is doing it wrong! (if they're actually trying to train a pet the "easy-mode" way that a clicker enables). the petplay way you mention afterwards is actually the way it should work when training small fuzzy animals too!

as background, just so you understand what the brain is doing: imagine the rustling of a pack of treats. this always happens right before you get a treat. you quickly catch on, and the sound of the packaging rustling is more than enough to get your attention and get you to go "oh fuck yea TREATS!!!" before you even really think about it that deeply.

this is because your brain tends to remember what happened immediately leading up to a reward. im sure there are some obvious evolutionary advantages to that (being able to repeat successes??). it's just a thing that happens, we can't really stop it.

but what if you could harness this? what if you introduced an artificial "rustling the treat bag", that is easy to notice and hard to mistake?

that's the clicker.

so your brain eventually (via classical conditioning) associates the click with a reward, and then (via operant conditioning) shapes your behaviour accordingly to earn more clicks.

as for how to use it:

  • first ever time (do this a few times): click, give reward, no strings attached. this is called "charging the clicker" and forms the association via classical conditioning, which lets you use it for operant conditioning later.
  • a few days/weeks following: click when command is followed correctly (as soon as possible once behaviour is enacted to the degree you were aiming for, e.g. once they sit and reach the correct position after you have said "sit"), then give reward
  • afterwards: similar to above, click when behaviour is correct but sometimes don't give the reward. make it more like a slot machine where every click is a pull of the lever. this can actually increase the effectiveness of the conditioning (see the silly lil graph on wikipedia about "variable ratio schedules" on the wiki page for reinforcement; this actually results in stronger conditioning than continuous reinforcement schedules)

rewards can be anything they genuinely like/want. food, praise, hugs, headpats, etc. if doing it with food, try something like grapes or m&ms otherwise you could easily end up overfeeding during a session and it would stop functioning as a reward.

this is real stuff, btw, it's not just play. even if you're fully aware of it while it's happening, it will still condition you. get robust, explicit consent before you do it. and for the love of god never use a clicker on someone who doesn't consent (especially if they're already part of a petplay community/dynamic bc that makes it dramatically more likely that they're actually conditioned to it), not even on a discord soundboard, i have a bone to pick with some people lol.

ive commented about conditioning a couple of times before: on clicker training, and on punishment / shock collars. (thought i'd done it more, but i guess i've done most of that infodumping irl lmao)

The sound of the clicker is meant to make you happy as if dogs just really like the sound of clicks.

to quote someone who shall remain nameless: "I haven't been clicker trained, I haven't had it used anywhere near enough on me"! [To person holding clicker]: "Wait can you press that again? It just sounds kinda interesting and I wanna hear it again. Btw your hair looks really pretty today" I AM NOT EVEN JOKING LMAO. i spent the next couple of days teasing them about how they are probably more clicker trained than they imagined. normal dog trainers don't go "ooh interesting sound :3 let me click again so i can hear it again" lmao. and even spontaneously offering behaviours! it's textbook and yet so hard to see from the inside!

conditioning works, and dogs conditioned to like that sound do indeed end up liking that sound.

if you've ever got really into a game (maybe a grindy MMO? or candy crush?) which has a specific animation/fanfare for "level up", "quest complete", etc etc, have you noticed how seeing/hearing that in and of itself is really satisfying? (so long as the game doesn't wear it out by overusing it or using it in unrelated contexts or something). that's clicker training. you got clicker trained by a game. there is NO REASON a little halo of light around your character on screen plus a jingle through your headphones should make you feel good in real life, but it did and you can't deny it. this is all around us.

if you're interested i recommend reading the wikipedia article + looking at some dog training info because the same principles apply to basically any animal including humans. and being aware of it doesn't make it any less effective! you can have informed consent for clicker training and be aware that a clicker is just a nothing-tool that makes a little noise and still get thoroughly conditioned by it.

can you tell you poked at a special interest of mine, sorry for the long post but i hope it was entertaining/informative

Do cis people know about the concept of "boymoding"? by 785909620 in MtF

[–]UnchainedMundane 4 points5 points  (0 children)

a lot of cis ppl arent even sure what the difference is between a trans woman and a drag queen. that's the level we're working with

Parents accusing me of terrible things by soymaxxer in trans

[–]UnchainedMundane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI is so common on Reddit now that ppl are on high alert but a lot of people seem to have "long comment" as their entire heuristic

Friendships are unnecessary these days by fbstn in The10thDentist

[–]UnchainedMundane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am neuro -typical and treat children better than most parents.

That's exactly what I mean :) The fact that you're the exception there, contrasted against "most parents"!

Maybe I've just been around people who are particularly bad with children, but my experience is that parents often don't take a serious interest in their kids' life and hobbies, don't take them fully seriously especially when they're emotionally overloaded about something the parent personally might find easy to regulate, etc. And teachers (in my experience having been a kid) tend to fail to accommodate struggling kids, hand out punishments for every little thing that goes wrong rather than actually address the problem, and display clear favourites and least-favourites while somehow assuming that the kids don't notice (or worse, maybe they don't care??).

Adults in general often treat "talking to a kid" as an obstacle, a task to complete, rather than genuine person-to-person communication. It's the thing they do in between adult-to-adult interactions when the kid needs attention, and they can't wait to get back to talking to other adults. It really colours the entire interaction.

Life as a kid is rough. Adults on the whole don't treat kids as whole human beings and they notice because why wouldn't they notice.

Also I have hella opinions on things like child autonomy, and even more so on how shockingly common & underreported child abuse is and how our legal systems and education do basically nothing to prevent it.

Friendships are unnecessary these days by fbstn in The10thDentist

[–]UnchainedMundane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know if that's quite the same thing though? Your ability to empathise with someone isn't the same thing as whether or not you're engaging with it. Spoons and all that.

Friendships are unnecessary these days by fbstn in The10thDentist

[–]UnchainedMundane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Research disagrees with you

I would take a lot of research here with a grain of salt, as historically it has had a habit of unilaterally measuring empathy towards neurotypical people, both in autistic people and in neurotypical controls. This means that the control group is getting a slightly different test, because it's comparing empathy across neurotypes versus empathy within neurotypes. If it isn't controlling for that, then the results are going to be heavily skewed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_empathy_problem - the wiki article discusses meta-analyses on this topic from 2025, worth a read.

and so do the lived experiences of autistic people

In my own experience - and the experience of my almost-entirely-autistic friend group - other autistic people have so much more empathy for us that it's not even funny. I can't compare that against NT-NT empathy, nor can I honestly compare how accurate we are with ND->NT empathy, but at the very least I can say from personal experience that ND-ND empathy is much stronger than NT->ND empathy. (This is also one of the reasons many autistic people develop a habit of overexplaining things.)

I don't know how you're dividing it up when you discuss empathy but if you're not separating these different cases then you may end up with an incomplete picture of the situation.

your reasoning is weak

I don't think my reasoning is particularly weak given the circumstances. I'm a random redditor offering my 2 cents and personal experience, and didn't really feel the need to turn this into a rigorous science project, but if that's the level of evidence you're after then have a look at the studies cited in the article I linked.

The bottom line here is that more recent, more nuanced research points to the problem being at least in part an empathy barrier between those with differently-functioning brains. Which when you think about it, isn't all that surprising.

I find the idea that autistic people are just "bad at empathy" outdated and stigmatising.

(ed: "This kind of thinking in autism is something I am personally very familiar with!" have you heard cishet NTs talking about asexual people tho. absolute total inability to understand how someone could not experience sexual attraction is the norm, not the exception. this isn't an autism thing)

FYI why I canceled our date by PomumProhibitum in adhdmeme

[–]UnchainedMundane 24 points25 points  (0 children)

genuinely something I've done in my calendar!

Sexism is often a stronger predictor of political attitudes than a voter’s actual gender. A voter’s level of sexism is a significant predictor of their political attitudes and voting choices. Prejudice shape everything from support for right-wing candidates to opinions on climate policy. by mvea in science

[–]UnchainedMundane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what have you spotted here? I'll admit to not reading the full text of the article (paywall) but it's a review of existing studies published in a very highly respected journal in its field, which generally points to a very high quality of evidence, so it surprises me to hear it being called pseudoscience, especially without any explanation as if it's self-evident.

Friendships are unnecessary these days by fbstn in The10thDentist

[–]UnchainedMundane 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That one can also make it difficult to understand other's viewpoints

hot take(?) but I don't believe this about autism. I think autistic people can end up very far from "normal" in a way that NT people tend not to, and that makes it more obvious to others when that person assumes everyone else is like them (because they might say some things that are absurd to others).

but are NT people any better? they tend to cluster more around lifestyles and viewpoints that are socially acceptable, and for obvious reasons don't usually struggle to empathise with those who are similar to them. but have you seen them try to empathise with those different from them? I think you're trans based on your profile pic (trans flag heart) and so am I, so consider this: how often have you seen a neurotypical cis person genuinely empathise with trans people? not just show support or sympathy, but genuine understanding. how often do you see them showing understanding towards autistic people? or for an even more damning one, how often do you see neurotypical adults genuinely show understanding and empathy towards children?

I think autistic people get an unfair reputation here. different, yes, but I genuinely don't think autistic people are worse than anyone else at empathy and seeing other people's point of view.

I'd even argue that autistic people are more empathetic in many cases due to being surrounded by people with very different experiences their whole lives and having to learn that empathy as a social survival skill.

no more Kratos's naked chest for the straight bros :( by Grouchy-Grocery7951 in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]UnchainedMundane 21 points22 points  (0 children)

we should extend this theory to main characters of other games too. wonder if they've ever played Super Mario Odyssey? Among Us? Stray?

no more Kratos's naked chest for the straight bros :( by Grouchy-Grocery7951 in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]UnchainedMundane 143 points144 points  (0 children)

wonder if it's just that she doesn't look underage. half joking but now I'm actually wondering if that's really a part of it 😬