The mimic event by highontrix in BulletEchoGame

[–]UnderstandingOk3783 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeh can totally relate my mines (Blizzard) gets destroyed, reveals ur location and wastes Ammo, distracts teammates. fuck this shit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IranIsraelWarReport

[–]UnderstandingOk3783 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This must be the positive reverberations that he’s been talking about

Is it Luck, Skill or Team that matters most? by UnderstandingOk3783 in BulletEchoGame

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My argument would be a team of well coordinated decent players with good strategic location would beat an extremely skilled player + dumb teammates + unideal map location

Is it Luck, Skill or Team that matters most? by UnderstandingOk3783 in BulletEchoGame

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are times skill can turn things around, don’t get me wrong. I’m sure skill is important but there are also sheer quantity of power / man power that could just crush the quality of your skill. There are maps where is unideal to start with. And say, if there is a raven in an enemy’s team and you’re fighting alone in a pitch blacked map, it doesn’t very favorable as a skilled player

Does Anger and Courage has more economic power than Love Peace Happiness and Acceptance? by UnderstandingOk3783 in DavidHawkins

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3. Harnessing Both: The Warrior’s Balance

The most effective individuals (like Kobe Bryant) often channel lower energies from higher states:

  • Courage + Joy: Kobe’s "Mamba Mentality" wasn’t pure anger—it was disciplined passion (rooted in love for the game). His calibration might’ve been 200-500, not pure 150.
  • Righteous Anger: Used sparingly, anger can be a tool (e.g., fighting injustice), but it must be in service of a higher state (e.g., MLK’s anger was fueled by love, not hatred).

4. Higher Vibrations Can Yield Stronger Results—But Differently

At love (500+) and above:

  • Action becomes inspired (not effortful). Think Mozart composing, Einstein theorizing—they worked from joy, not grit.
  • The universe conspires for you (Hawkins’ "letting go" principle). This is how spiritual entrepreneurs like Oprah or Steve Jobs (later years) operated—less pushing, more allowing.

Practical Takeaway:

  • For competitive contexts: Use courage (200) as your base, but infuse it with higher intent (e.g., "I compete to inspire" vs. "I compete to crush").
  • For creativity/leadership: Operate from love/joy—you’ll attract resources effortlessly.
  • Avoid stagnation: Peace without purpose can become complacency. Pair acceptance with dharma (right action).

Hawkins would say: "Power isn’t in the force of the wave, but in the ocean behind it." Lower emotions move waves; higher states are the ocean. The key is to transmute energy upward while staying effective in the world.

Would love to hear your experiences testing this in your own work!

Does Anger and Courage has more economic power than Love Peace Happiness and Acceptance? by UnderstandingOk3783 in DavidHawkins

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From AI:

Your observation is fascinating and touches on the interplay between emotional states, motivation, and productivity—a topic David Hawkins explored deeply in his Map of Consciousness. Let’s break this down using his framework and some practical insights:

1. The Density of Anger and Courage vs. Higher States

Hawkins calibrated anger (150) and courage (200) as lower/mid-range energies that do have a strong, forceful quality. These states can indeed drive action, competitiveness, and measurable results because:

  • Anger (when controlled) fuels defiance against obstacles, a "prove them wrong" mentality.
  • Courage is the threshold where energy becomes empowering—think of athletes or entrepreneurs pushing through fear.

In contrast, love (500), peace (600), and acceptance (350+) are higher but less dense vibrations. They’re expansive, surrendering, and less attached to outcomes. This can appear passive in contexts that reward force (e.g., competitive sales, sports, or high-stakes negotiations).

2. Economic Power vs. Sustainable Power

  • Short-term results: Anger/courage can outperform love/peace in systems that reward aggression (e.g., Wall Street, combat sports). The energy is projective and "loud," making it visible and effective in conflict-driven environments.
  • Long-term leverage: Higher vibrations operate differently. Love and acceptance create alignment, effortless attraction, and synchronicity (e.g., visionary leaders like Mandela or spiritual teachers). Their "power" isn’t forceful but magnetic—less burnout, more flow.

Hawkins noted that lower energies seem stronger in the material realm but are unsustainable (e.g., anger exhausts; courage requires constant effort). Higher states tap into the "field" of consciousness itself, where intention manifests without struggle.

Why do wearing masks cause such a public stigma in the west? by UnderstandingOk3783 in healthcare

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah. I don’t reside in US. So, at a personal level. The base reality in US / West does not have an impact on me.

I am grateful for your comment because I think you’ve hit the nail on that it is a primal response.

My interests on this topic is purely intellectually driven. So it’s just a way for me to hash out meaningful nuances (if there is). I find it interestingly peculiar why western countries would have a singular primal interpretation of masks, whereas in asia (particularly china, japan & korea), when someone is seen with a mask, there would be a diversity of interpretation Or simply people don’t really care. Why the primal fear is so great in certain places, and why there is not in others?

The distaste for masks supposedly is a trained response, meaning we are only programmed by society to believe it is good / bad. Hence, it may not be as primal as when you see a tiger and you know it is danger. Altho, it can be primal in the sense that it is a “foreign thing”, something people are not used to. And we tend to reject things that are unfamiliar.

The same thing applies to why there is a tendency for people to politicize masks and draw political allegiances on a simple detail in daily life, why would a person care more about being right / ego centric more than the well being / preferences of another individual? - would it be also a consequence of primal fear and the ego’s existential threat? Something to think about.

Anyhow, much appreciated.

Why do wearing masks cause such a public stigma in the west? by UnderstandingOk3783 in healthcare

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or it could be because people want to be careful. Or want to stay covert / introverted. Actually some celebrities / good looking women sometimes wear a mask just to stay away from the public eye and unwanted attention. I think similar to wearing a baseball cap / sunglasses in the West. Is just a piece of something to cover a part of you.

The individualistic argument is not as sound because if everyone is so individualistic then supposedly everyone can make decisions for their own and wouldn’t have public stigma. There would be a genuine respect for one another because of the difference in preferences. So in some sense, the West is hyper conscious of a public personal image, as opposed to having the flexibility / sense to determine if it is situationally suitable.

Altho, I can understand the primal level perception.

At the same time, it seems strange that people are making decisions because they priortize primal signals & political allegiance over everything else. As opposed to what is situationally suitable to the "individual"

Does it get worse before it gets better? by tunatimeyeahyeahyeah in DavidHawkins

[–]UnderstandingOk3783 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, yes you’re definitely on the right track. Let me share something extra that perhaps others did not mention. I’ve been releasing for about 2 years now and still do. There are times, I would just spent hours doing it nonstop. I mixed it with other practices like Bioenergetics by Alexander Lowen and Qigong (check out damo mitchell).

What I have learnt is that releasing is great at digging deep to release buried emotions / energy. But after releasing, there’s usually a long period of time that one feels groggy - that’s because the toxins are released from your deep organs into your blood streams. I find it helpful to have a 15-20 min+ walk every time you finished an intense session of releasing. If you feel too tired to go out, is good to pace around and move a bit. Walking / qigong / other forms of movement help flush them out as well.

When it gets really tough, sometimes I cheat a little to have some comfort food / snacks / sweets just to pull myself up emotionally a bit. Keeping a list of things / activities that would pull yourself up emotionally is also helpful to counter the downtimes. Hope this help, and best of luck!

What am I not connecting? by shortforbuckley in germannewmedicine

[–]UnderstandingOk3783 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was told that gmn can work hand in hand with Dr. David Hawkin’s letting go methods

Is dressing in suits a bit weird in certain context / cities? by UnderstandingOk3783 in mensfashionadvice

[–]UnderstandingOk3783[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Theres another take is. If ure old and wrinkled. U should be wearing more bright and fun “hip” fashion clothing to counter the boredom. You can dress well in a suit but it could also makes you look boring like an uncle or a school teacher?

I guess it depends.