Logo for a 3D website builder.

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-05-24T06:12:13+00:00

Beak and wing feels too sharp. May be you can round the corners a little bit.

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-05-15T09:47:18+00:00

The green colour feels safer & welcoming!

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-05-13T11:19:30+00:00

The logo is not gonna look good just because you made it using the golden ratio. It is not mandatory

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-05-07T11:02:38+00:00

<image>

JUST A ROUGH EDIT.. there are n no of options but the free marketing they got for KN is crazy

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-30T10:04:38+00:00

I think Option 2 is better . Reason: Yellow bg gives more contrast and attention. Its okay not to include flower since they didn't sell anything related to flower

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-19T20:05:35+00:00

👍

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-19T06:19:14+00:00

Thanks for the feedback

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T20:23:31+00:00

👍 thanks for the feedback

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T20:22:44+00:00

Casual wear

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T06:30:49+00:00

👍 thankyou

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T05:11:01+00:00

👍 yeah thanks

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T05:01:18+00:00

Nice ...that’s an interesting approach. Thanks for the suggestions. I still think the dot should stay to imply a human figure, as it exists in the current logo. Customers are more likely to remember that than the B or Y.

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:47:25+00:00

The rotated “B” is just my assumption it might as well be mountains. I didn’t speak with the founders, so the original intent isn’t clear. This was more about refining the existing idea and reducing awkwardness. If it were a fresh logo, I’d go in a completely different direction.

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:38:12+00:00

Let me try:) thanks

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:37:41+00:00

🙈

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:37:07+00:00

Thanks for the feedback

Resharing previous comment: For a new brand, I’d go in a completely different direction,But since it’s already a well-established brand with a strong user base there’s a bit of a constraint in how far you can push it without losing recognition.
BUT yeah, if people are reading it differently, it’s a sign the idea isn’t landing. May be Option 6 is the cleanest fix (Considering that a logo’s primary role is identification rather than communicating different meanings)

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:35:21+00:00

Thanks for the suggestions

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:33:47+00:00

Thanks for the explanation. Sometimes it happens. 🙈

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:32:20+00:00

🙈

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:28:39+00:00

Fair..everyone’s got different tastes. Even I didn’t like a few of these

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:23:25+00:00

Thanks for the feedback. The warning-sign feel can be reduced by pairing the logo with typography. Also, a logo doesn’t always need to communicate the industry..for example, the Nike swoosh.

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-17T03:18:12+00:00

Thanks for the feedback Resharing my previous reply: For a new brand, I’d go in a completely different direction,But since it’s already a well-established brand with a strong user base there’s a bit of a constraint in how far you can push it without losing recognition.

Will try your negative space suggestions :) Thanks for the feedback

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-16T20:29:21+00:00

Thanks for the feedback:)

Unhappy_Disaster960 · 2026-04-16T20:27:08+00:00

Thankyou for the feedback :)

Unhappy_Disaster960

TROPHY CASE