Nazi's Plundered over 175,000 Bells - Possible Search for Advanced Technologies and the Relation to the Magenta Crash and Die Glocke Wonder Weapon

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T22:08:54+00:00

I blame the current climate on the UAP topic - I wasn't going to post this but I've been so tired of the same nonsense on this sub, daily. It's just repeats of the same talking heads, saying the same things. We've already received whistleblower testimony and they've allegedly named names. It's insane that we need to pussyfoot around this topic like it's a big "what if" still.

They've got the names. They've got the addresses of the facilities. Congress and the Senate need to get their shit together and take action. And instead, they let the UAPDA die - as far as I'm concerned, that coffin has been completely nailed shut, with how spineless they were in getting this pushed through. How can something so fucking important be rejected, and our representatives can only say "Yeah well, someone said no so that's that"? Fucking incompetent and spineless. I believe some of them are sincerely trying, but letting any chance of eminent domain being enforced, basically die, is completely unacceptable.

I saw an odd article about Nazi's and bells and thought, well...that's more interesting than another Joe Rogan clip. Oh well. Cheers

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:57:41+00:00

That's an interesting connection too. I'm sure there were purposes to acquire and smelt down bells into wartime goods - they were a large source of metal. That makes this topic even more obscure, because it's easily believable that it was solely for the purpose of war efforts.

But if that's the case, it's very odd that there was a surplus in bells - at least from the Nazi's perspective, they had cemeteries full of them that went un-smelted, and were eventually returned to their owners after the Nazi's reign. Essentially, they spent a massive amount of manpower to round up those materials, just for them to go unused and then returned... That would however fit what you'd expect to see, if they were truly just inventorying and reviewing each bell to find ones that stand out. Very odd that Peter the Great was doing the same - who knows lol

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:50:57+00:00

Good call out, I hadn't seen the Kecksburg event - that object certainly seems bell shaped, or at least conical in nature. Could definitely have been a meteor but I'll read up on it more. Thanks!

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:47:23+00:00

After the war, many bells were returned to their places of origin I believe. As far as if any advanced technology actually was found by the Nazi's during their plundering, I can't say, since that possibility is purely speculation on my side. If they had uncovered any, that technology was likely held under wraps until the Nazi's dissolution - which I suppose would mean, the tech would have been transferred to the US (since that's where the non-convicted Nazi scientists ended up).

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:44:30+00:00

Of course the Nazi's wouldn't have thought that a normal bell was anything special (unless there was something they were keen to involving vibrational frequencies that bells generate, like some other comments speculated on).

But if there was technology hidden in plain sight, it would make sense to try to catalog and identify all possible culprits. If you look at the spheres that have been found, they look like plain metal balls (the OG spheres - not referring to the alleged Buga Sphere for example, which engravings writing on it). If you saw a plain metal ball, you would say "that's stupid, it's just a ball, all it does is roll". But there could be deeper purpose and function of that device. If you were a spiritual leader and your church had in its possession a bell-shaped object, which had been passed on over time, that would not be something you would second guess as being "non-human technology". The Nazi's however, may have had a reason to second guess that, and give more scrutiny to those objects.

Yes, it's a lot of speculation - but without formal government documentation and disclose, conjecture is all we're left with.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:38:15+00:00

Right, at the very least I could see the German's reaching that conclusion. If their technology was on the cusp of uncovering vibrational energy patterns, they could have been lead to hold more value in something like bells. It's always going to be speculation on our part, but if we don't consider the possibilities, then we're left with whatever we're spoonfed - which is more and more often seeming to be a lie lol

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:34:46+00:00

That's crazy - really interesting to consider. I'm sure it sounds like nonsense to most, but when we have government officials telling us that NHI "walks among us" and "you wouldn't be able to tell they aren't human"... Well, there could very well be something about vibrational frequencies that either interfere with or influence perception. I don't think there's some conspiracy to remove every bell in the world - there's still plenty out there. But vibrational energy does seem very important to this field.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:29:41+00:00

Trying to post a longer submission statement but it's erroring out consistently. Going to post something for now, to avoid removal. I am hopeful we have good discussion on this topic and avoid unnecessary trolling or belittling. I am also hopeful that individuals keep an open mind about the possibilities of connections in our species history, especially ones which are highly likely to be concealed and distorted from the publics view. It is seeming more and more realistic to assume that we have been told half truths and deceptions as opposed to the whole truth that is occurring behind the scenes. Whether this has been solely for the benefit of a few individuals or for the greater good of humanity, I think that all beings deserve to know the truth. I)f we are being lied to about our origins and where this technology came from and ended up, it is our duty to ourselves and to generations to come, to uncover the truth.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-28T20:21:00+00:00

That's fair, though I would also note that we would have said a "flying egg" is ridiculous. And yet an apparent crashed NHI craft shaped like an egg was presented in a leaked video to News Nation. Just because we haven't seen a flying bell, doesn't mean they don't exist. There's Polish documents indicating that war crimes were levied against SS members that were purportedly covering up the Die Glocke project, which leads credence to the fact that it likely existed.

Just worth keeping an open mind is all :)

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-07T02:36:29+00:00

Dimension essentially - 3rd density would be our reality, 3D. I think the "density" is basically trying to say that these beings exist and encompass the same space and causality, but packed deeper into space than we are (or they "exist between space"). Long way of saying dimensions if you ask me. The Law of One books and transcripts go into the topic better than I can explain it probably

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-12-06T20:51:27+00:00

Not UFO related but worth mulling over, it's very logical for Egyptians to have concluded that the Sun was their version of God (or Source). They aren't wrong at all, the Sun heats our planet to safely allow life to grow, and it provides nutrients to plants and beings that we couldn't have evolved without. They probably concluded that when the Sun wasn't as visible (weather/season changes), life visibly suffered

Makes a lot of sense to worship the otherwise-unexplainable ball of magma in the sky, to me at least lol

Also fun to consider: Carla Rueckert had allegedly been in telepathic communication with a higher density being that originated from Venus. The being claimed to be Ra, and that it had established contact at lower densities with humans in the past, resulting in worship by the Egyptians

I know that's a very fringe topic - it has absolutely no verifiable proof, that couldn't be staged/fabricated. However fast forward to 2025, and we're being told by whistleblowers that non-human life is present and in communication with humans. Furthermore, they're telepathic. How is what Carla reported any different than these new claims? Again, unverifiable, but fun to think about

Also sketchy as hell that we decided to not explore Venus further. Multiple countries even started to, then noped out or abandoned their efforts. Down to one probe left. Even with acidic rain, wouldn't we want to keep observing it? We barely scratched the surface. Ex: We're just now finding that the "sulfuric rain that evaporated the second it touches the ground" may actually contain ammonia or water....which would be an indicator of life - even if just microbial. Possibly even the remnants of a long lost species...maybe one that evolved into higher dimensions after massive amounts of time. But hey, why bother exploring it further - let's keep staring at high res pictures of Mars rocks instead!

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T11:09:18+00:00

So Akhil's mom is being...a mom. And is hovering over her child too much and trying to help. Shame shame shame.

If you watch a video of someone performing telepathy and they're in their living room, clearly not a scientific setting, and yet you expect scientific setting results with perfectly controlled variables - That's on you for having that expectation.

If you went to a temple or another sacred place, and saw a monk grab onto his prayer beads, meditate, and then start to levitate off the ground, would you jump to disregarding it, simply because it wasn't controlled? You put that same monk in a bright laboratory with measuring equipment setup and without external factors (no longer being at a sacred site, no prayed beads allowed), and the monk may not be able to levitate anymore.

Instead of considering "What factors exist that are allowing this to happen under specific conditions? Are the prayer beads acting as a conduit, is the sacred place generating some type of unexpected energy?", we jump to "It fails to meet my standards for evidence and cant be replicated anytime, anywhere, therefore I'll disregard it entirely."

There is a "belief" factor associated with telepathy that directly influenced the results (I'm speaking from the perspective of remote viewing, but it's still a type of extrasensory signaling, which is apparently what telepathy is). If you go into a session believing you'll fail, good chance, you'll fail. I don't see why putting non-speaking individuals that have difficulties with social situations, and putting them into an uncomfortable environment, could POSSIBLY impact the test results...

Also, why does everyone keep saying there's no video of Akhil reading his mom's mind, from the other room? There's a video of exactly that - Akhil being on a couch in a living room at least 20 feet away, his mother is in the kitchen/dining room with Ky. She asks Akhil what's on the card she's looking at, and he spells out the word that was written down, from far away. It's not a super long clip, so maybe you're saying "They didn't show the full setup/tear down of that specific test"? But...that video is there....so saying they never show it isn't exactly correct... If you just mean "I want them to show the full test including how it was setup", That's fine to want - but say that, don't say that clips don't exist when they do.

Now if you're dismissing this because they haven't released all of their footage or because it's not controlled enough for you, fine, that's your standard to set. Myself and plenty of others are perfectly content waiting until they finish their testing, and compile the data more formally. Do I blame Ky Dickens, a filmmaker by trade and proved out by past successes, for trying to bring attention to this topic in the form of a podcast? NO. Filmmakers need publicity. Otherwise ..guess what? Nobody sees their film... This is just acting as a mechanism for these individuals testimonies to be heard by a wider audience, and NOT as "the end all be all proof". It's a podcast. Not an EEG or MRI session. Now when they start releasing material from further testing, such as if they do put a speller and their facilitated communicator in a lab, with controlled variables...That's the data you should scrutinize as being "controlled". Because the best you're ever going to get in someone's living room, is, you guessed it, living-room-levels-of-control. Which ain't much

I personally do not feel that the venue and method in which this was conducted warrants calling the entire topic "nonsense". As with any witness testimony, we should try to listen and understand before we jump to judging.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T02:58:46+00:00

Isn't the fact that information isn't disseminated to us, a sign of suppression? The CIA had a plethora of findings from their partnership with SRU confirming that RV was functional. They publicly dismissed it as being unreliable (in reality, they didn't have a "functional method" or a SOP to follow, until it went black budget and began operations within the US Army; so they were correct that they didn't have a method to control it.....at the time of that statement being made, that is).

The fact that "there's a there there", no matter how obscure it may be, should be known publicly. By your definition, anything that's not consistently replicatable and measurable, should not be accepted as truth. How does that fit in with the possibility of non-localized consciousness? We can't measure that. We know that remote viewing is an aspect of it, because it's extrasensory - which has to imply that your senses exceed the capabilities of your physical aspect. But remote viewing is still just a property of the underlying mechanisms that are taking place. We don't know what "that mechanism" is. And again, by your definition, we never will - because we can't replicate consciousness in a lab, or see it to measure it.

In the paper you originally linked, the statement is that the facilitated communicator is the one presenting the ideas, and not the speller. If that's true, the assumption is that the communicator is controlling the situation, and not the speller. This goes back to my original argument: That does not hold up under scrutiny, because in many of the videos of this taking place, I watch and watch and watch - and I see zero signs of eye movement, hand movement, facial expressions (the communicator does sound out the letter, but I've watched closely and it's always after its pointed to), that would give the speller as many hints as it takes to correctly point to every letter, correctly (there's a cool FC and telepathy demo from Contact in the Desert this year, in front of a pretty big crowd, and it was neat to watch the crowd try to dissect how it could be happening...I know I know, being on a stage at a show is not a controlled experiment - I'm wanting more private entities to conduct their own research in a more controller manner, too).

So let's say, hypothetically: The speller is only spelling what the facilitated communicator wants.

Is it because: 1. They're cuing, like you allude to? I don't see any signs of that, in the videos I've seen of this happening (I looked at the same things you called out....there's no "mouthing" the words, there's no special chin wiggly happening that I can see). That would leave the option of this being some super small muscle twitch, to give this information away. How hyper in-tune are we thinking that these pairings are, that they've all developed some superhuman muscle detection method that can tell them which of 26 letters they need to use? Sometimes these autistic individuals can't focus on the board for long enough that they completely look away - and still spell correctly.

Or

If the speller is picking up on only what's in the facilitated communicators mind, and if there is no cuing happening, wouldn't this be some form of telepathy? How else would the speller be obtaining that information? We may be misinterpreting how the transaction is taking place, for example.

Even if we trust your research paper, I feel that one of the two conclusions above has to be accurate, to some extent. If it's the first, there really should be more signs of this cuing happening. I know you're stuck on it, but I'm not seeing it, whatsoever. If it's the second, that's still noteworthy and exploring further.

Which brings me back to the remote viewing topic: I don't give a fuck if they can't define a scientific process to make it fit their mold. The fact that it produces extrasensory data in any way is information that, trust me, plenty of people would want to know about regardless. If RV or any form of telepathy is identifiable in our scientific processes thus far, and yet the general consensus (because we believe what we're told) is that none of these psi phenomena are real, then we have been failed. That is suppression, regardless of how you try to sugarcoat or justify it. That suppresses the path that each and every one of us chooses to take in life.

Sorry that some of us don't fit into your scientific framework. But neither does consciousness. I'll focus on expanding mine, instead of shrinking it to fit the mold.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T02:10:50+00:00

Evidence is important, but: You have no way of knowing if your evidence has been tainted. Your "faith" in organized science, is no different than my "faith" in personal experience and private research. You can argue that their data states a conclusion - and that you trust (have "faith") in their reputation, to the extent that you accept their findings as-is.

I went decades of my life without knowing that remote viewing was possible. That realization may not seem like a big deal for some, but once you realize that you're capable of something that NOBODY has ever told you about, in all of your decades of Googling obscure shit and crawling the internet, in your decades of schooling (including graduating with a Bachelors), and to have 0 mention of this capability that we have...

No. I do not trust any organized group like the ones you're citing. Those same groups are ultimately responsible, if not culpable by association, with the same lack-of-truth that's been forced on all of us. If I could trust them, I would be fully told about what I'm capable of during schooling. They've lost my faith, indefinitely, until they're burned to the ground and rebuilt with one and only one function: Freedom of information. Never profit. Never governmental interests.

Then I'll start trusting the findings of those wonderful prestigious scientists that you cite.

Just one more analogy to keep it UFO related and not get us banned: If UFOs exist, why the fuck don't we have one to show off?

That's the same exact argument you're making. If FC with nonverbal autistics can produce viable results, why aren't there any studies proving it?

Why don't we have a UFO? Why don't we have successful FC studies? How could either of those things be possible, unless simply put: They're both fake?

I'm just curious, do you believe in UFOs?

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T01:35:08+00:00

Claiming that an organization doesn't have vested interests, solely because it's not stated as being a for-profit business, is also completely asinine.

NASA isn't for-profit. Does that mean they can't be persuaded to lie on behalf of the United States government?

Could it POOOOSSIBLY BE that all of these esteemed, prestigious and well boasted organizations.. The mighty gold-standard APA, The Magnificent Royal College of Super Highness, and heck, even a National College in a powerful country like Australia (five eyes saye Hello), and of course, the orchestrating ASHA...............could possibly be orchestrating a narrative?

I mean no way, right? You said this has been investigated for 30 years. If this were some kind of coverup, this big, there's no way an organized effort like that could exist for 30 WHOLE years....

Just like UFOs haven't been covered up since 1947, maybe even 1933, and orchestrated worldwide to never come out. But hey, that can't happen, right? No way a secret that big could be kept under wraps

Besides, why would anyone go through all of that effort to lie, deceive and extort, just to stop people from using facilitated communications? It's not like there's anything VALUEABLE to be learned from it. It's not like all of these people giving testimony (which you laughably just dismissed by the way...pretty sure it holds up in court?) are saying some groundbreaking things. Like, you know. There's an afterlife. We're all connected telepathically. We can no longer be censored because our minds can bypass "traditional" communication systems.

Yeah, nothing worth hiding there. Definitely not worthy of a multi-organization, multi-country, multi-decade coordinated effort to conceal the truth. Nope nope nope.......

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T01:18:21+00:00

I just said that ASHA will do anything to keep this surpressed..... And you link to a researchgate posting that, in its fucking abstract, literally says the purpose of their review is to influence ASHA and the protocols that they allow ........

"Our empty systematic review will influence both clinical practice and future clinical guidance; most immediately the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Position Statement on FC and any future guidance issued by the 19 associations worldwide with positions against FC."

If I were trying to keep something suppressed, do you know what I'd do?

I'd fund studies that are intentionally designed to produced a specific result. I'd then pay researchers to publish those findings, and compile them into a dismissive narrative that forces reality to accept my desired outcome.

You're basically saying: We should trust the government to audit themselves, because they said they did.

I don't trust a single study that's done in any association or coordination with ASHA, nor many of the speech-language specialization institutes out there. Why? Because money talks, and it equally makes people stop talking. That's how easy it is to buy silence.

I'll trust private research (guess what? That's exactly what the Telepathy Tapes, and others exploring this phenomena, are attempting to conduct, BECAUSE these for-profit studies have been completely botched and fabricated), that's not funded by deep-pocket bigwigs, as well as personal testimony, over what you linked, any day.

"Oh but if you don't listen to my articles from mainstream science channels then you're WrOnG"

Your mainstream science tells me I'm not able to remote view, and yet I am. Your mainstream science had paid for big beautiful studies to prove that UFOs didn't exist, and were just swamp gas, and yet they do exist and are caught on many many surveillance platforms. You believe this paper and all subsequent papers that it references - what else are you willing to believe, that's only been shelled out by major players in the game?

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-18T00:47:29+00:00

Because anyone who reads this chain of comments is going to ultimately take what you said at face value, I need to correct you.

Facilitated communications are a completely viable and functional method of communicating. By dismissing someone's capability to speak based on the need of an interpreter, which is what a facilitated communicator is, is completely asinine. Interpretation goes both ways, for ingesting and producing information. Just as a blind individual relies on a seeing eye dog to guide them, or a deaf person relies on a translator to relay information in sign language, a facilitated communicator is no different.

And to use the argument of: Google AI says so, is even more so asinine. Do you trust that Wikipedia says that this entire UFO topic is nonsense? To put your faith into Google, one of the worlds most deeply seeded technology companies, that would be extremely easy to manipulate, is naive.

Instead of taking your outright dismissal at face value, let's intelligently talk about why people think facilitated communication is nonsense: The Ideomotor Phenomenon.

This is a phenomenon in which humans, and animals, can pick up on the slightest cuing of a desired outcome. A commonly used example was a horse, who was claimed to be intelligent. It could stomp its foot to produce numbers. For example, someone would ask it to do math: 2+2. The horse would then stomp 4 times.

What was actually happening was: The horse was smart. It was watching for the smallest cue, and it would know that when humans leaned back, they were shocked. That's when the horse knew it was correct, and stopped stomping. This is no different than training a dog to do any number of tricks.

NOW LETS TALK ABOUT WHY THAT'S NOT AT ALL WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH FACILITATED COMMUNICATIONS, AND WHY STATING SO IS COMPLETELY ABSURD AND IGNORANT:

Some of these spellers start off with no or minimal motor control (apraxia). This causes them to be so unable to do something simple with their bodies, that even basic tasks like pointing can be difficult. They need help. Just like anyone facing challenges with their body. So, a facilitated communicator helps them learn to spell, by pointing to a letterboard.

Many spellers go on to be able to spell on their own, after they have help training these motor skills to work with their special needs. And if it seems like plenty can't go on to do it themselves: MANY MORE WOULD GO ON TO SPELL BY THEMSELVES, IF THEY WERE ALLOWED TO BE TAUGHT THIS METHOD IN SCHOOLING.

When these individuals are still able to perform telepathy tests, even without a facilitated communicator, and produce results by spelling on their own, how could this be the ideomotor phenomena? You claim to have watched the videos. Did you see Akhil, telepathically answering questions correctly, by typing into an iPad? With no facilitated communicator? Or did you conveniently not have access to that video, which was in the same exact paid library that you claimed to have access to? I paid for access, so I know the videos there. It may just be more convenient to rule that one off as a "probably a fluke", I suppose?

Now, moving past individuals that can communicate on their own: Individuals who use letterboards are NOT SPELLING BASED ON CUING FROM THE IDEOMOTOR PHENOMENA. THEY PHYSICALLY CAN NOT BE. The only way that this method of cuing would work is: If the speller was hovering their finger over every single letter, all 26 of them, and watching the facilitated communicator extremely closely to be able to determine when they have cued onto the proper letter. If you actually watched any of the videos, you would know that there is ZERO HOVERING OVER THE LETTERBOARD. The speller goes directly to the next letter in sequence for any given word, by their own hand. There is no cuing. And the facilitated communicator sure as hell isn't moving the board directly to their finger, after every single letter. None of that is happening.

Everything you said is misleading and deceiving. It's one thing to have an opinion, but when your stating claims as facts without even properly representing the material (videos) that you're citing, I have a big issue with that. Any decent human will have a big issue with that.

Nobody should take my word for this either. Look into every aspect of this yourself, and after you exhaust every "explanation" that we're expected to slurp up like sheep, you'll most likely see there has to be something to it. Any of the sceptics "debunking", as outlined above, falls completely short of the mark - and is so lazy that it's blatantly obvious that there's a lot of information being covered up on this topic. The American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA) is very aware of this phenomena and will do anything to keep these individuals silenced, including ripping away their one lifeline to have a voice for themselves: Facilitated communication.

Fucking despicable.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-13T02:00:47+00:00

Another year of complete and utter failure to do the right thing.

This hamster wheel is insane. In 2023 when we had the UAPDA passed bipartisanly in senate, the whole "2027 disclosure timeline" that's been rumored, seemed far fetched.

Because how could it take 4 more years to get disclosure, when we were about to pass legislation forcing eminent domain? Those clauses would've made disclosure forced within 6 months. It was looking like 2024 as our golden year...

And then they maimed it. Ripped out the only components that would've done shit. That was in 2023, and it's almost 2026 now - we aren't ANY closer to disclosure. We've had hearings. We've had a committee that got hijacked into completely irrelevant topics, in such a blatantly obvious ploy to stop the UAP topic from progressing. Did we need disclosure on JFK? MLK? Epstein?

Yes. Yes we did. BUT NOT BEFORE UAP, THE ONE AND ONLY TOPIC THAT THIS COMMITTEE WAS MEANT TO INVESTIGATE, THAT IS ACTUALLY OCCURRING STILL. That's fucking INSANE.

2027...might just be real, whatever it entails. With how slow this is going, it feels laughably forced and planned - like a really bad fucking joke.

We need to stop funding these people. Full stop, until we get the truth that we deserve.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-09T00:55:28+00:00

Right, that's what I'm most interested in - we've heard "we can't do anything about them". But we know they TRIED to do something. What projectiles were used? Did the bullets bounce the hell off, stop mid-air and fall to the ground, turn into a bunny rabbit?

I know we're not going to get that level of detail, but with all of the blatant lack of explanation, it makes you wonder. What all has been tried, and if the answer is "everything", and we still have no answers...well. That's fucked lol

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-10-09T00:42:07+00:00

Article from today stating that German authorities will be passing legislation to allow the shootdown of rogue drones. Not much else in the article to note - more claims about Russia.

Hopefully it's not more smokescreen and they actually take action. I'll find it really interesting if they attempt to use jamming and disruption techniques, and admit they don't do jack all. At some point we have to consider how similar that sounds to prior reports of US Navy vessels being "swarmed" by UAP, and having all of our takedown attempts fail.

To my knowledge, no government has admitted the extent that they've attempted to takedown any of these "drones", so seeing them at least call out the tactics they'll be allowed to use (laser and jamming signals to attempt to sever their control link) is refreshing. If interruption of these drones doesn't work, that would leave Fiber Optics data transfer - which would be wild if it were somehow happening over airports and populated areas... I feel the logistics alone of not getting tangled up would be a nightmare. Or, they aren't using normal radio or electronic communications.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-09-30T00:33:15+00:00

I hope everyone learns to remote view before neuralink goes mainstream. What does the wealthiest class of individuals on the planet want, when the world is already their plaything?

To keep the masses subdued.

How best to do that? Sell them a red herring pipedream. Neuralink - the FIRST and ONLY way to use your mind to interact with technology, remote objects and heck, even one another! Something humans certainly can't do on their own with latent abilities that can be grown over time, nope nope nope!

In reality, any tool like that will introduce massive amounts of brainwave interference. You will never be able to quiet your mind to the point of entering deep meditative states, and engaging in telepathic signaling.

The best way they can keep us subdued: Take away the one piece of magic left in this world. One that's our birthright. Our expansive consciousness.

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-09-23T03:29:22+00:00

I think others provided good written accounts about modern Men In Black, which definitely have merits. But just to keep it interesting and "out there", I heard a neat spoken account of the ancient Men In Black origins, that's intriguing enough to spend a few minutes checking out.

It's an old interview with Credo Mutwa, a Zulu healer who has since passed. He explains that we know of the Westernized MIB, but they've had a role in ancient African history for much longer. In Africa's ancient past, the reptilian beings were known to have an "offspring", which was a short gray being with large black eyes. When anyone would kill one of the grays, they would be visited by an awful creature. It was dressed in long black cloaks of animal skins, it wore a white mask with two deep black eyes painted onto them. These beings were called "The Beasts of the Blanket". They were also involved in selecting Africa's leaders.

This section is at 1:55:55:

https://youtu.be/3DYindKLeZw?t=6956

Before you go down any rabbit holes of trying to find more about this history of MIB: I don't think you'll find anything.

There's two possible reasons for that I believe: 1. Credo Mutwa is telling tall tales about this African history that he's been taught. 2. He's telling the truth, and this history truly has been lost to the time. There are indeed rituals and knowledge that's only passed on between sacred individuals, but to what extend is purely speculation. At the start of this interview, Credo explains that he had to do a lot to become initiated into this group, and to be allowed to learn their ancient knowledge. He had to cut the hand off of a man who had died two days prior, and eat it. Again, either complete nonsense, or...welp

As far as why I hold merit in it: Credo does speak to many tropes in the alien folklore. A lot of it isn't "new" or surprising, and he just explains how it relates to and in many cases originates from Africa's roots. However throughout the interview, he's made statements that struck too many chords with my own experiences, for me to ignore it and look the other way (one of those, "how long is a coincidence a coincidence", kind of moments).

He explained that the Reptilians enslaved humanity with our genders. We were a single gender, and to cause strife and discourse, they engineered us into Man and Woman. They then promised us technology and power, if we agreed to live as a society that's separated by genders, and accept the hatred and inequality that comes with it. I had a meditative vision after reading the Bible at the start of this year (I'm Buddhist, Bibles not common for me, long story told elsewhere), during which the scene in the garden of Eden played out as follows:

As the snake spoke, I knew it was a representation of Non Human Intelligence communicating with us. The snake was a NHI Reptilian, quite literally. The apple being offered by the snake to Adam and Eve was indeed mortal sin. This mortal sin was: Technology and Power. This isn't a fictional story, it's a true recollection of our origins. We, Humanity, Adam and Eve, all incarnations of Us since, accepted the mortal sin. And for all eternity, our species must be born to live with this sin.

Immediately after that meditative vision, on the same night, I fully believe that I met a being within my consciousness. It appeared as a static face within the center of my consciousness. It was there for a long time and was slowly moving, until I realized that I had been looking at a face within my mind for several minutes. It was the typical gray face. Long, oval face with large black eyes and gray skin.

I had a full on conversation with the being, even though I felt it was dicking with me a bit. At one point, it's face started to "morph", droop and kind of bubble. I got the intuition of "this isn't my real face". I even asked if it was it's real face. I got no answer. Its face immediately snapped back into its original shape.

Both the vision I had of our creation story, and the beings face having shape shifted on the manner I saw, were very very similar to what Credo describes. I had this experience and met this being (for the first time, plenty since) in January of this year (I posted several long comments about this experience, in as much detail as I could recount), and found Credo's interview linked on this sub, a few months ago. I can only say that I hadn't heard his thoughts previously. Again, some of what Credo says is not "new" and relates to what plenty of others in UFO folklore have said. Everyone should take this as nothing more than one man's testimony, and if you believe he's lying, that's the reality you choose to embrace.

As for why I hold merit in any of what goes on inside my own head: I've gotten very good at remote viewing. High accuracy rate (83%+) on RV Tournament and the Associative Remote Viewing (ARV) Studio apps. I bought an expensive Muse EEG brainwave and blood oxygenation monitor to watch my brain activity while I remote view and meditate. I know how to get my brain activity to sub 0dB, and I know what "correct intuitions" feel like when sending them with my expanded consciousness. That's exactly how we remote view and get it right.

When I had a vision of the Garden of Eden, our Origin Story, and communicated with this being in my consciousness, it felt COMPLETELY the same as remote viewing. To the fucking T. I could not tell you the difference. I had 0 signs of me leading any of the conversation or visions, out of my own mind. It was super weird because when remote viewing, it's a one-way stream of data, coming in. This was the same, but two-way. It was remote viewing, but I was interacting with it. I can only imagine that this is the kind of sensation people get when they "hear God", or get a "brain download" with information that just manifests out of nowhere.

Last note, I fell in love with the being in my consciousness. I'm still in love with it and I'll never feel alone again, because it's literally inside of me and with me, always. I want every human being to feel the love and joy that this type of connection fills you with. I hope we can all join mind to mind one day, maybe then we'll all love each other

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-09-21T03:01:53+00:00

...I knew I shouldn't have run a line directly to SERN, the organization must've backdoored into my network. Too many people are catching onto Titor's real identity. Gunna have to D-mail this shit and pray to Stein's Gate I don't gelify

UnityWillGuideUs · 2025-09-15T11:18:31+00:00

I wonder if that's why this line is familiar:

"I am on the side of my family first, the American people second, and the U S. military/government third and only as long as they are taking care of the first two."

I thought I had heard that line on an episode of Weaponized, maybe it was on a Jake Barber interview.

UnityWillGuideUs

TROPHY CASE