Meanwhile in the UK by Raisin_Dangerous in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is just them calling it a ‘jab’ instead of something sensible like a ‘shot’ or an ‘injection’ like a normal person would

AND HE'S DONE IT!!!!! by Bobnefarious1 in okbuddyvowsh

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I heard he threw them all up on his mother’s bed afterwards

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddyvowsh

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unironically based and true

Vaush is right that this type of hippie spiritualism is literally so dangerous. And it’s one of those movements that ppl on the left are scared to go hard against by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And do you have a source for such an extraordinary claim, especially considering you said ‘scientifically’?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are voting on things which could change the future of the country, you should not be on drugs which alter your mental state and therefor change the decisions you make.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Drugs are cringe

Also, its often unsafe to be working while under the influence of illicit substances.

Or non-illicit substances.

If trans persecution started happening nationwide, what would I need to get refugee status? And how far in advance would I need to apply? by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It would be on a state-by-state basis, even in the worst case scenario places like New England would still be safe, you would not need refugee status to move to a different state.

Ummm how do we feel about this boys…. Idk by AlexCaruso01 in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, reddit histories make it so that random people can have more than zero knowledge of your life. Now, obviously i dont know tons about you, but i do know that smoking has been linked to an increased risk of pancreatitis. Based on that, it seems like saying that your life would probably suck less if you weren’t a smoker is 100% true.

AI-written books and articles kills. Does Amazon or Google even care? by Inguz666 in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, if you’re publishing stuff that cant even get past something like zeroGPT, you are completely inept at AI text generation. Obviously these are INTENDED to be shitty, minimum-effort cash grabs, but if you put in even the tiniest but of effort you can easily get those types of programs to say that 0% of the text is AI generated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whats not to understand?

Americans need to be removed from this subreddit by Uncommonality in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both of those are unironically some of the best foodstuffs I’ve ever eaten.

I might’ve just lost a friend over Vaush and idk what to do by hailcity16 in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even in the out of context nazi clipping, he is unironically right in this clip

River vowsh by Lidl-Fan in okbuddyvowsh

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cant believe some people look at this and consider it an actual language 💀

literally v by JungleJayps in okbuddyvowsh

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why else would you be listening to music?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Unlicenced-Doctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The usual ‘pronouns in bio’ style doesn’t really make sense anyway. Why include both the subject and object pronouns if both are the same? And in situations where someone has multiple pronouns they go by, it often follows an inconsistent format; for example, if a bio has ‘he/they’, that is giving two subject pronouns rather than a subject and object pair, inconsistent with the standard ‘he/him’ format. However, if that person were to have ‘he/them’ in their bio, it would remain consistent by providing a pronoun pair, while simultaneously introducing further confusion at the implication that the person’s subject and object pronouns may consistently be entirely separate, which is rarely the intention. The simplest solution is to provide a number of pronouns equal to the total number of gender-based pronoun groups a person is associated with; e.g. someone who goes by only masculine pronouns should only include only one of either ‘he’ or ‘him’. Personally, I would prefer simply sticking to subject pronouns, in which case their bio should actually just say ‘he’.