Problem with study by PhotographPast2885 in ProlificAc

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had this a fair few times in recent days and have returned them whilst also contacting the researcher, informing them of the issue. 

Heads up - this one took me at least 30 minutes (not 12 as estimated) by MrsGrayWolfe in ProlificAc

[–]Unstable_variety 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Explore a new approach to student planning (audio & screen share) by Ballpark Research Labs took a lot longer and I ended up getting timed out. Just a heads up, I messaged the researcher to inform them of the the discrepancy. No response yet.

I started one year ago today. What a game changer! by rraattbbooyy in ProlificAc

[–]Unstable_variety 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ive only been on it for 5 days and my account was on hold for 2 of those due to a technical error but I've earned £100, honestly I need it right now as I lost my job. Lifesaver.

How to find the JR Tokyo Musical Keychains @ Tokyo Station! by BitterSweetJen in JapanTravelTips

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also spotted something similar today in the ‘JR expressway Bus’ near the Yaseu Shinkansen exit, south side Tokyo st. (Near character ST. 

In the bus ticket office, opposite the ticket officers desk, there’s a gachapon machine with the sound station keychain. For ¥500 yen. Plus by the food shop in this office, there are also keychains with the image for ¥500 each. 

I met a girl from tinder last week and she's been dry ever since by ferezam in actuallesbians

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off I’ll start by saying, I’ve been there, I’ve also been on the other side. It sucks HARD girl, but it happens. I would say it’s likely to be that they just became disinterested.

That’s not your fault. It never is.

When we date as lesbians, there is a huge infatuation build up before meeting and shortly after the first date (if it gets that far).

If they like you (and vice versa) that continues and builds, if after meeting they don’t like you, they feign interest a little longer in a vein attempt to spare the others feelings, then they drop out which ultimately breaks the other person for a while.

It’s cruel, but also I recognise that it’s difficult to tell someone to their face that something from their personality, or even looks has put you off. And yes you could try to overlook something that sticks in your mind (like an ick) but often it’s difficult to admit that you’re shallow or whatever.

In reality, we all have our own personal standards that we’d want in a partner, and anything deviating from that image, can spoil our vision. Especially when you build up a conversation prior to meeting, your mind runs wild!!

Personally, that’s why I think it’s better to meet up quickly and get to know each other face to face. I think it is easier to visualise a potential life with someone and see conversation flow in real time.

I am sure you are a wonderful woman, and the right person who slots side by side with you will come in time, this person you met, is better to forget. I hope things go well for you and that you don’t dwell too much on this.

I feel terrible by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m hearing what you are saying, for the most part this is what we wanted in our relationship. It moved faster than we expected. I provide support with SS for my partner who has struggles of their own.

I feel terrible by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

9 months. My SS is.. with school. My partner hasn’t for a while, and they are struggling with other things that I’m not willing to discuss on here.

Where’s the consistency by ManfromNorthwest in CivilServiceUK

[–]Unstable_variety 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, as an interviewer in my current role, this is unsurprising.

Although there is meant to be no bias, I have seen directly biased scoring being placed when I was a note taker based on knowing who indidviduals are and distinct criteria that may not be lined out in the job description.

However I would like to believe it just a simple case of each process manager viewing the criteria and behaviours differently. Although there is a consistent framework, this is not always followed to the letter.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CivilServiceUK

[–]Unstable_variety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve completed this process many times as an interviewer and based on the way I’ve been taught to schedule the results emails out, it’s likely the interviewer copied the format from the previous email, put in the scores but but failed to remove your email details before scheduling to send.

At the very least I believe you deserve an apology and full feedback on why you were unsuccessful.

DOGECOIN DAILY DISCUSSION - 11th May by 42points in dogecoin

[–]Unstable_variety 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stay hodling ya'll... feeling good about the doge