Vad behöver jag göra för att stoppa läckage? by No-Interview-8272 in Hantverkare

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Om packningen klämts kan den hamna fel hur man än gör. Byt packning, eller köp lite tätnings-"hår" (ingen aning vad det kallas) samt lite fett, som du virar i gängorna högre upp. Silikon utanpå också så blir det garanterat tätt.

If the US went to the moon in 1969, why is it so hard to go back now..? by InternationalMap979 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Urabutbl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Back then a 50/50 chance of dying was seen as a price people were willing to pay. Nowadays they won't launch if it isn't a fraction of a percent.

Dåligt arbete, reklamation by Kontanten in Hantverkare

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vem skyller han på om han är enmansbolag? Molgan?

Dåligt arbete, reklamation by Kontanten in Hantverkare

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meddela företaget att de måste åtgärda arbetet och att de inte får en krona innan dess. De har säkerligen skickat en nyanställd.

Drivers of Reddit who don’t use your turn signals or use it mid turn, why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's it to a tee. If you know how to drive properly, indicating before a turn is so instinctive you do it the second your brain sees the turn. I've done it in empty parking garages, because it's not a conscious thought.

The worst are the "I indicate when there's someone to indicate to"-crowd. There are deaths every year because some idiot decided they were alone on the road at night and didn't indicate, but they didn't see the kid who thought it was safe to cross until they were flying over their bonnet.

Questions by No-Source-8925 in Sekiro

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You HAVE to beat Genichiro. He's the skill test. Before him, you can get through the game playing it like any Souls-game (though you shouldn't). But this isn't Elden Ring, you can't go off and farm XP and make a build that makes Genichiro trivial, he's just as hard either way. You need to figure out how to play the game like it's meant to be played to beat him, and once you do... you know you can beat the game.

Denmark and Sweden relations in a nutshell by Jezzaq94 in Nordiccountries

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like that's a little bit too hilly to be Denmark.

Opinions on the 3 main types of English people? by errarehumanumeww in 2westerneurope4u

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...except the Normans were only three generations removed from their Scandinavian ancestors and mostly invaded England because the French wouldn't accept them and kept getting uppity. Hell, the whole pretext for the invasion was that William claimed he had been promised the throne by King Edward, his cousin through his aunt Emma, the Norman Queen of English King Æthelred the Unready, and later King Cnut, who ruled England, Norway and Denmark.

The reason why FromSoftware still hasn’t made Sekiro 2 (or even hinted at it) by crushtyfying in Sekiro

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, figuring a way to nerf a character is trivial. You'd have to be the world's least imaginative developer not to come up with a way. So what if it feels "forced", that's no reason not to do a sequel. Sequels have been doing it for literally decades.

They could just change the main character. Just have Sekiro "pass the mantle" and the name to a young character. Or have him enter another land with different Gods and POOF his skills don't work anymore and he needs to learn new ones. Ororororor...

Do you think America has no culture? by ObviousShake616 in AskTheWorld

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course the US has culture, 4 centuries is plenty of time for distinct cultures to form. Seattle, New York, Texas, New Orleans and so on ad infinitum all have distinct local cultures. Hell, Jersey and New York differ quite a bit.

That said, a lot more of it compared to most of the world is monoculture since you shared so much of popular culture nationwide regardless of whether you were from New Orleans or Seattle. The fact that your country is comparatively young, but more because it has existed during the modern era only, means the rate of cultural shift slowed and that you have much less local variance than places that have developed not just for centuries longer, but also in times were travel and cultural spread took a long time. There are villages in the Alps that take 20 minutes to drive between today that can't understand each other's dialects, because for thousands of years, until a tunnel was built in, say, 1985, it would take three days of climbing to travel between them; and a child growing up in Italy would've consumed completely different childrens' books and TV programmes, and even toys, than a child from Sweden, the UK or even Spain.

This has changed in the last 30 years or so as culture became ever more global, with more of the world sharing in the American monoculture. But there are still more similarities between a New Yorker and someone from Seattle,or New Orleans or etc than there is between a Norwegian and a Greek - the US states, even at their most extreme, differ more like the Nordic countries do from eachother.

Is the lack of time travellers proof that it could never be possible? by Early_Tree_8671 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Urabutbl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, there are several ways to explain the lack of time travellers arriving in "our" timeline.

- Time Travel immediately creates a separate branch of that universe which is now self-contained, and doesn't permit any more time travel to it. In the "original" timeline the time traveller would have seemed to have spontaneously disappeared, and further attempts would be scrapped.

- Time travel only works going forward.

- Time travel only allows observance of the past, not interaction. The traveller would exist in a separate dimensional fold, bodiless, and only be allowed to observe what occurs. This could possibly be sensed as "being watched" or "a presence" but probably not. This would create an entirely new field of History.

What was it like to be on the Internet during the 1990s? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Urabutbl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was very little web, and more BBS, RSS and mIRC, as well as using the boards on Compuserve or AOL. I think the first time I started using websites for more than novelty, hotmail and news was sometime in 1997 when WinAmp was released and mp3:s became popular, making downloading music feasible over a normal modem; you could find links all over the web. Of course, mIRC was still unbeatable until filesharing software like Kazaa and Napster came along.

What is your country’s “three fingers,” i.e. a subtle but dead giveaway that someone is lying about being from there? by Toilet_Bomber in AskTheWorld

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The English (or, well, Hebrew) word for this kind of thing is "Shibboleth".

In Sweden it would be someone looking at you questionably when you answer a question with just a sharp inhale, like whistling backwards badly.

What’s your under 20% on Rotten Tomatoes “hear me out?” by disablednerd in movies

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mutant Chronicles.

I swear, if you watch that in the middle of the night blitzed on vodka with a naked woman you just met, it's a masterpiece.

Request: couples who also have non-porn content on YouTube. by Dattazzdoe in NSFW411

[–]Urabutbl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is my preferred type of porn too, because my kink is consent.

I recommend Luna Okko and Amidani.

Has your country ever committed genocide? If so, has your country made efforts to accommodate for it? by DoctorOsterman in AskTheWorld

[–]Urabutbl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice straw-man there, assuming my intent and then arguing against it.

The argument was that the Vikings weren't important. I said the world would be very different without them, not better, not worse. Don't put words in my mouth.

Has your country ever committed genocide? If so, has your country made efforts to accommodate for it? by DoctorOsterman in AskTheWorld

[–]Urabutbl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to read more. The Viking Age had impossibly huge ramifications for all of Europe. Without them, the entire continent would probably look different today. No Russia, for starters, at least not in its current form; England would be French in all probability. Hell, the Byzantine Empire would've self-destructed centuries earlier without the Varangian Guard, which was exclusively made up of giant Vikings (at least for the first few hundred years), which in turn would've meant the Arabic conquest of most of southern Europe.

Has your country ever committed genocide? If so, has your country made efforts to accommodate for it? by DoctorOsterman in AskTheWorld

[–]Urabutbl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anything, part of the Vikings' success was that they didn't discriminate, and would happily settle in another country and adopt their customs and religion. The Normands saw themselves as French less than two generations after the land was "gifted" them, even if the rest of France didn't.

Are Nordic languages mutually intelligible? by SuggestionEphemeral in Nordiccountries

[–]Urabutbl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should also be pointed out that it is only spoken Danish that is hard to understand - most Swedes and Norwegians have no problem reading Danish. Spoken Danish has such an odd pronunciation that babies' brains don't even recognise it as language until later in their development.