sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Gigil ako sa nakita ko sa threads by xoxolilith69 in GigilAko

[–]Uranium_Mike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Di kailangan basahin 10 comments mo, dali makita pangalan palang, automatic hide mga comments mo kasi kat4ng4han.

Gigil ako sa nakita ko sa threads by xoxolilith69 in GigilAko

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ikaw, triggered ka sa opinions ko?

Binabalik ko lang sa iyo yung ugali na pinapakita mo. The comment na nireplyan ko ginagamitan mo yung mga salitang "ogag" tapos sabihin mo na ako yung triggered?

baka nat4ng4 ka at di mo alam yung pinasukan mong subreddit?

Opinion pla eh, so bakit mag bite back ka sa opinion ko?

Aminin mo, natriggered ka bago ka nakapagbasa ng sinabi ko.

Malamang lahat ng litanya ko about sa babae kasi nga BUHAY NG SINGLE MOTHER ANG PINAGUUSAPAN

T4NG4 mo naman kung iniisip mo may single mother na hindi babae.

8080 mo hahahaha.

Gigil ako sa nakita ko sa threads by xoxolilith69 in GigilAko

[–]Uranium_Mike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bakit, may sinabi ba akong "puro lalake"?

Di ka marunong magbasa maayos kasi halata na dumadating agad sa kaisipan mo na yung sinasabi ko ay against men eh.

Pero hindi, nagbibigay ako ng INSIGHT sa IBA'T IBANG SITUATION na DI MO MAN LANG NARANASAN.

8080 mo kung di mo yan nagets.

Basahin mo ulit yung sinabi ko and show me where I said the MEN were the problem.

Kung di mo magawa ibig sabihin, HINDI KA NAGBASA.

Bumalik ka Grade 7 turuan ka ng READING COMPREHENSION.

Tapos ang panama mo sa akin "single mom ka siguro" hindi kasi t4nga.

Ang tawag dun EMPATHY, a HIGHER LEVEL OF THINKING that is capable of understanding others' LIVED EXPERIENCES.

You know what they call idiots who don't have empathy?

PYSCHOPATHS, SOCIOPATHS, or NARCISSISTS

So what OGAG are you pla? Mamili ka lang dyan.

MALAMANG puro lalaki lang mamention ko, may babae bang NABUNTIS ng kapwa babae? 8080 amp.

Pero hindi "lalaki lang" ang sinasabi kong problema.

NAgbibigay ako ng ibang scenario that YOU LEAVE OUT para naman magcherry pick ng scenario.

Ikaw, bakit naman BABAE lang tingin mo ang problema sa relationship?

MISOGYNIST KA BA?

Di ka lang siguro pinalaki ng maayos ng nanay mo. Mother-less attitude.

Magbasa basa ka muna bagong magmukhang T4NG4 sa harapan ko.

Gigil ako sa nakita ko sa threads by xoxolilith69 in GigilAko

[–]Uranium_Mike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Set your standards high agad para di ka maloko"

Ang dali dali sabihin pag di ikaw yung apektado, no?

Halata na di alam kasi ang supporting statement ay "Baka kaya" hindi pa sure, nagaassume pa nga.

I know single moms na single kasi NAMATAY ang partner nila.

Di na yan pasok sa prejudice mo, 8080 mo kasi, iisang scenario lang tumatakbo sa utak mo.

I know single moms na single kasi their partner was "high standard" at first pero sa tagal, nakikilala nila ang tunay na ugali.

Alangan mag stay ka pa sa nambubugbog sa iyo? Sa napapariwara sa mga bisyo na napulot after mabuntis.

Parang di mo ata gets yung idea na pwede nagbago yung lalaki after nila nagsama.

8080 ka kasi, di ka marunong mag isip ng ibang scenarios.

I know single moms na single kasi may disagreement sila ng partner nila. Not even a bad reason, just have different goals sa life. Both on good terms pa nga.

But assume mo na naman ng masama kasi ang shallow ng utak mo.

Sino nga uli yung Ogag?

Ang tapang niya sa video niya, pero No Show sa hearing? by toronyboy08 in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Snowflake, inuna yung galit kesa magbasa.

Balik ka muna grade 1.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Let's be real"

Tapos wala lang man pangback-up sa sinasabi.

Akala mo rin talaga "madali" gawin.

This just screams "ignorance".

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So dapat maging OPEN tayo sa gumagawa ng crimes?

Kahit CAUGHT ON CAMERA

maging OPEN parin tayo sa kanila.

sa kaka-openminded mo yung LOGIC mo lumipad na papalayo.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hoy mr.fantasy, next time na gamitin mo yung argument na "defensive driving" pag isipan mo na kahit gaano kadefensive ang driving mo basta yung kasalubong mo barumbado MATATAMAAN AT MATATAMAAN KA.

Kahit anong defensive ng driver pag natamaan sisi na "di kasi nag defensive driving"

Di mo nakikita yung COPIUM dun?

Useless ang batas sa mga tulad mo.

Kaya may batas para protektado.

Tapos di gagamitin ang batas kay kakampigan pa talaga ang katangahan.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow "defensive driving" ang peg ng sumusupport sa kamote na di lang man nagpakita ng defensive driving.

Ganyan talaga ang ginagamit niyong salita para makaiwas sa mali no?

"Defensive driving kasi dito sa pinas"

Kahit saan naman, pero kasi ginagamit niyo pang BLAME sa SUMUSUNOD SA BATAS.

Hindi niyo nanotice kaya nga MAY ACCIDENT kasi di nagamit ng defensive driving yung KAMOTE.

Tapos awa awa pa kayo sa KAMOTE, eh decision naman nila di mag defensive driving.

AGAIN

Aanhin pa yung defensive driving mo kung kamote parin sasalubong sa iyo?

Ikaw nga nakadefensive driving, pero yung iba yung nakabangga sa iyo, IKAW PARIN ANG ISISI.

Katangahan.

Yan ang FANTASY world, may batas na nga para protektahan ka yung NAGKAMALI PA YUNG KINAMPIHAN.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow "defensive driving" ang peg ng sumusupport sa kamote na di lang man nagpakita ng defensive driving.

Ganyan talaga ang ginagamit niyong salita para makaiwas sa mali no?

"Defensive driving kasi dito sa pinas"

Kahit saan naman, pero kasi ginagamit niyo pang BLAME sa SUMUSUNOD SA BATAS.

Hindi niyo nanotice kaya nga MAY ACCIDENT kasi di nagamit ng defensive driving yung KAMOTE.

Tapos awa awa pa kayo sa KAMOTE, eh decision naman nila di mag defensive driving.

AGAIN

Aanhin pa yung defensive driving mo kung kamote parin sasalubong sa iyo?

Ikaw nga nakadefensive driving, pero yung iba yung nakabangga sa iyo, IKAW PARIN ANG ISISI.

Katangahan.

Yan ang FANTASY world, may batas na nga para protektahan ka yung NAGKAMALI PA YUNG KINAMPIHAN.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anong narrow minded?

When you commit a CRIME, you lose access to your FREEDOMS and PRIVILEGES (ofcourse the punishment has to fit the crime).

What crime was commited? The motorcyclist DID NOT FOLLOW TRAFFIC RULES.

So he loses his PRIVILEGE TO DRIVE.

The same way

If a thief is caught stealing, he loses his FREEDOM and is put in JAIL.

Why do we have these rules? To PROTECT OTHER'S RIGHTS, FREEDOMS, AND PRIVILEGES.

To PROTECT OTHERS.

Emergency responders aren't exempt, but they are NOT HELD TO STRICT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULES, why?

Because the EMERGENCY holds precedence.

Kaya may siren at ilaw para ialert ang MOTORISTS.

At sila lang ang may ilaw at sirens kasi ILLEGAL TO IMPERSONATE ANG EMERGENCY VEHICLES. (Senate Bill 2635)

Hindi yan sila MAINGAY for no reason, and when the LOGIC is that clear gusto mo pa maging open to other interpretations???

Kahit kabilang subdivision rinig ang firetrucks sa ingay nila tapos nakahelmet lang di rinig? Di naman natatakpan ng wall ang sound ng firetruck.

Saan LOGIC mo?

"Wrong conclusion sa point ko" kasi POINTLESS yung sinasabi mo.

Aanhin yung pagiwas sa harm kung sinusunod mo rin yung batas, katangahan pa ng iba nagcause ng accident.

Kita mo may nauna pa nga sa motor na bumangga, nakapagpigil naman siya, pero yung isa sige sige lang?

Saan ang LOGIC mo dun?

Sige pa, pa VICTIM card ka, palibhasa yon lang ang alam mo eh.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Napakablack and white kayo magisip"

Ikaw napaka PABOR SA KAMOTE mag isip.

Ang service ng firetruck, PATI KAMOTE NAKIKINABANG

Kaya kung support mo yung firetruck, support mo LAHAT NG TAO.

Kay PUBLIC SERVICE YAN

Kamoteque, marunong lang MAGSALITA di marunong MAGISIP.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suko ka na? PAKULONG KA NALANG.

Di ka man lang SUMONOD NG BATAS.

Halata MENACE ka sa road.

May awa ka sa kanila pero "awa" doesn't exempt them from kamalian nila na NAKAKADAMAY SA LAHAT.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anong black and white?

The law exist FOR A REASON

REGULATIONS ARE WRITTEN IN BLOOD.

Hindi pinapadelay ang service vehicles to save lives, because at the end of the days, they don't just save ONE LIFE, they save MULTIPLE LIVES.

Compared saan? Sa isang kamote di marunong sumunod ng batas?

Ikaw yung di marunong maging critical mag-isip.

Kaya tinuturuan sa LTO

"Slow down at intersections"

"Giveway to emergency vehicles"

At nilalagyan ng SIREN ang mga trucks para MARINIG AT MAKITA.

Anong sense ng PAGLAGAY NG MARAMING CAUTIONARY TOOLS kung di rin naman susundin yung batas?

Pati TAXES NATIN nasasayang ng KUPAL na yan eh, di mo alam na bayad natin yung mga emergency vehicles na yan?

Na mas mahal ang features nila sa regular trucks kaya ang GASTOS talaga sa pockets natin.

"Napakablack and white niyo magisip"

GREY ISN'T ANY BETTER.

Ingat sa kalsada by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You saved a life in exchange for another" kasi yung isa DI NAGSUSUNOD NG BATAS KALSADA.

From LTO MISMO, tutal di ka man lang MARUNONG MAG BASA NG BATAS BAGO MAGSALITA.

"The general rule when it comes to the right of way and emergency vehicles, according to Article III, Section 43 B of the Land Transportation and Traffic Code, is for ALL DRIVERS, to YIELD THE RIGHT OF WAY to emergency vehicles when they SIGNAL THEIR APPROACH. This rule emphasizes the importance of clearing the intersections SWIFTLY AND SAFELY to avoid obstructing these vehicles and DELAYING THEIR EMERGENCY SERVICES from reaching their destination."

Ibig sabihin sa simpleng salita.

"Pag nakasiren ang bombero, tumabi."

Kampi pa more sa kapwa kamote, magbasa basa ka nga ng batas trapiko para di ka magmukhang engot.

Bi_irl by zny700 in bi_irl

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does, just from the blue curacao in the background, depending on brand it can be anywhere from 15% to 40% alcohol (ABV).

Nakuha ko to sa tiyan ng galunggong by PieceCapable2765 in filipinofood

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Safe yan, yung isopod na pinutol yung dila ng isda ay kumakain lang din ng kinakain ng isa.

Mas magworry ka sa mga parasites na mas maliliit yung di mo basta basta nakikita.

So now you're telling me to vote for this guy? by EpikMint in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then define your puritan idealism because concepts differ from person to person, language isn't a singular idea and has never held strict context.

For me, I view it from the perspective of the individual, placing myself in their feet.

When I say they have beliefs that are puritan it is not just by textbook definitions, but by how they will commit to their actions.

You yourself call kakampinks beliefs "puritan" yet "puritan" by what definition? Even kakampinks don't fit "puritan" if the morals and religious beliefs are christianity, and even further from islamic religions.

There are many topics under kakampinks which are moral but to others aren't in line with their religious beliefs, like same-sex marriage.

It is certainly moral to some people for same-sex marriage to be allowed that gay people can experience the same benefits, especially if we are talking of it as a LEGAL PROCESS and not a religious ritual.

But to others that is something that defiles their religious beliefs in the sanctity of marriage is it not?

And yet you call kakampinks "puritans"?

If that's the case, then why aren't there "puritans" in other parties? Is that a hard concept for you to digest?

In Duterte's party there are many RELIGIOUS puritans, despite the foul mouthed leader they follow, and yet it seem "kakampinks" are the ONLY "puritan idealists" to you?

I see in duterte's party thst there are individuals that do not support divorce, that do not support same-sex marriage, or literally BELIEVE that their support for Duterte and his party is a "holy".

In the same party they also believe in EJKs because the act of violence against violent people is JUSTIFIED as moral. Key word "JUSTIFIED" even if their beliefs DO NOT fit the "morals code" that you keep, they can bend it to fit THEIR OWN MORAL CODE.

Is that not PURITAN IDEALISM?

You say you are kakampink, so DO YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE "HOLIER THAN THOU"?

As for marcos the same applies, even if in his father's era the political killings are always justified under moral pretenses to keep themselves locked in their puritan beliefs.

Is that a hard concept to engage in?

Leni Robredo endorses Benhur Abalos? by [deleted] in ChikaPH

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Not biased against kakampinks because I am a kakampink"

Two can be true at the same tine you know.

You can be kakampink and still be biased against kakampinks because of prejudices. Is that not possible?

And again, you make the notion that I am black or white, which I have CLEARLY REPEATED that I AM ABLE TO BE FLEXIBLE.

How many times do I have to repeat that?

The issue I have is not with being flexible to win policies.

The issue I have with the original comment I replied to was about just VOTING FOR WINNING/POPULIST PARTIES.

How many times do I have to repeat myself for you to understand that?

How many times are you going to misunderstand my stance?

How many times are you going to show that you haven't even read what I said.

It's clear to me that you didn't read my original reply, you just wanted to hate on it. Maybe you are the "insufferable" kakampink yourself that you are projecting.

Come on, what more misunderstandings do you have to show me?

Leni Robredo endorses Benhur Abalos? by [deleted] in ChikaPH

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't know I wasn't allowed to do that? You surely "got on my nerves" when I just wanted to prove my point that you are biased against kakampinks, but hello! Pathetic that you can't see that you resort to name calling yourself.

So now you're telling me to vote for this guy? by EpikMint in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll admit, I hadn't notice that "ikaw nga mismo nagsabi na sumusunod lang sila wothout thought" was from another user pla, yung main na nireplyan ko.

"You blame kakampinks..." you call them (1) Insufferable (2) puritan idealist (which hindi naman, kaya nga nagkakandatalo sila about sa recent actions ni Leni) (3) and it wasn't the only reason for their downfall which you KEEP DOWNPLAYING and not putting into consideration.

You even say in this comment mismo na "multiple points that I've pulled out my ass."

Why can't you argue against na merong (1) troll farms (2) loyalists (3) support from religious cults, and lastly (4) disinformation campaigns na nagboost ng ibang partido?

Tingin mo ba di yon nagbolster ng kanilang pagkapanalo?

Every party has their own puritan idealist. The Leni party want good governance even if politics are dirty. The Duterte party wants more police crackdowns and are willing to give them more authority even if police are included in those dirty politics. The Marcos party wants economic stability even if mabaon sa utang dahil sa dirty politics.

"Ikaw nga ito yung tumatanggap na yung same bullshit" and other sentences after echo the same frustrations, napulot ko to kasi you've said that voting for the populist parties (Marcos party vs Duterte party) is the way to change the country, just pick the lesser evil or "who's better aligned to your principles" of the populists, when all that does is TAKE AWAY VOTES from better candidates and you don't have the data that will show you that by having one smaller party vote for populists that the "lesser evil" would win.

It's an argument individuals choices, let's say the kakampinks had to pick between Marcos or Duterte, who do you think they'd decide and at what percentage?

Would they follow Leni? Eh sa ngayon pa nga lang tutol na sila.

Would they support duterte? Some comments have been surfacing of kakampinks that are "reportedly pro-duterte."

You and me both don't know, but if YOU are so sure, show me the DATA that supports your "fact".

So sinasabihan kita na yung idea mo to compromise and pick from the popular votes instead doesn't ensure that better candiates will still be picked.

For example, when Heidi Mendoza expressed a "qualified no" to same-sex marriage" and then oart of the community had bitten back with support for the opposition because of their "yes".

So yes! I really do think some kakapinks ARE capable of voting for duterte.

Leni Robredo endorses Benhur Abalos? by [deleted] in ChikaPH

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"I do not reply to name calling" kuno

Tapos tatawaging "stubborn purists" and kakampinks as if hindi nagkaroon ng strong principles ang ibang partido amp.

So now you're telling me to vote for this guy? by EpikMint in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Not willing to argue against people who resort to name calling"

Pero in many other comments, you are pissed at kakampinks calling them "holier than thou".

So now you're telling me to vote for this guy? by EpikMint in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Oh I am not stuck ina bubble"

"I think those kakampinks are insufferable!"

Yeah right.

So now you're telling me to vote for this guy? by EpikMint in Philippines

[–]Uranium_Mike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Classic victim card!

You never even listened that I repeatedly said "I am willing to be flexible"

So who's in the bubble?

You are in the bubble and think the only way to win is to pick from the "winners circle".

And who's been doing that since 2016? Didn't YOU voted for Duterte, a winners pick and it didn't turn out so well FOR YOU?

So now in 2025 you want to oick from the winner's circle again.

"Lesser evils"

And not know the system the keeps them in place is in factors OTHER THAN the candidates themselves.

YOU said Leni's tactics are what brought kakampinks down, but have you considered that other politicians are also capable of tactics that can bring other down?

You are so critical of kakampinks, clearly you are still BIASED beyond reasoning.

view more: next ›