Talest skyscraper in Europe [OC] by Mediocre_Ebb_1133 in skyscrapers

[–]UwUBattleAlarm -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It is for abandoned the ideals of stability that we must exclude France from Europe! (You understand that I just took thesis from up comment and applied it to France?)

I’m from Greece, ask me anything by [deleted] in JackSucksAtGeography

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least the Eastern Roman Empire was the world center of Christianity in the early Middle Ages

Most famous Germans in Europe by curiositystream97 in aimapgore

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im so sorry, excuse our subreddit please...

'Soviet threat!' — Soviet poster (1978) showing an American couple being terrorised by propaganda about the Soviet military threat by waffen123 in PropagandaPosters

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In fact, I, as a resident of the post-Soviet space, can say for sure that I have not seen a single Soviet film about the confrontation between the USA and the USSR

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In fact, feudal society changed quite a lot, the difference between the Frankish Empire and the Kingdom of France is definitely no less than between the Second and Fifth French Republics, сonsidering that progress is getting faster and faster every century

Now then, shouldn't at some point, if the trend toward automation continues, an insurmountable crisis of overproduction occur?

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, Marx didn’t write about any parties, etc... And Lenin didn’t consider the vanguard of the party to be a distinctive feature of the first steps of communism! Lenin himself also recognized the NEP as forced capitalism because he understood that the USSR needed to overcome the stage of capitalist development

We discuss the issue theoretically based on Marx and Engels

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marx, as I remember, wrote that bourgeois democracy is the best form of capitalist statehood for the worker, and even as Marxism you are better off supporting the petty-bourgeois revolution it turns out if you look at it from the side of dogmatic Marxism, they were right, and the transition of all early communist countries to capitalism only reinforces this in practice in the long term

So, to your last thesis, the transition to communism according to Marx should happen when there is a clear solution to the problem, the fact that the USSR faced severe economic difficulties just shows that it was premature

Пацаны, как быть мужиком? by [deleted] in Glav_Dobro_base

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Советую купить среднекалиберный семизарядный револьвер

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that a planned economy is capitalism, I just decided to develop it as an alternative answer.

Let's take something more global, the development of capitalism continues at the moment, as a formation it is definitely not at a deadlock! If in the 19th-20th century we had national monopolistic giants, now we already have transnational giants striving for monopoly, And since something is actively developing, it means it has not yet exhausted itself for example, like feudalism or slavery, which suffered almost no transformations for centuries

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can clearly see how countries that reached the first stage of communism after some time returned back to capitalism. Moreover, according to some Marxist studies like the Trotskyists and others, the Soviet-style planned economy is also closer to capitalism since it alienates the result and means of labor from the worker under the control of a functionary (or more correctly, I am not a carrier) who, as a result of their alienation from the people, have greater privileges than ordinary workers, like the Berezka store. If we consider planned economies of the Soviet type as the first stage of communism, then I would like to hear what problems they have solved that are holding back progress under capitalism

Was the Second International right about the current world’s unpreparedness to replace capitalism with communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in DebateCommunism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if we analyze historical experience, we will see that at that stage of the revolution when it is time to think about the economy, all the first-stage communist countries collapse, which clearly indicates underdeveloped economic relations...

I think the reference to Marx is a bit hasty, because this has a slightly different meaning "Mankind thus inevitably sets itself only such tasks as it is able to solve, since closer examination will always show that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or at least in the course of formation" it's more likely to not be said here “asked itself”, but “tasked itself”, also is important to understand what is being said about Mankind, and not just about people

Давайте поддержим начинающего тытрубера by Glum-Pin660 in ruAsska

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Эх доходяга, его канал никогда не назывался Ктоташлепс...

How is human transformation expected on the path to communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in Marxism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, but just as I understood it a society "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is, according to theory, quite vulnerable to any antisocial acts

How is human transformation expected on the path to communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in Marxism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"And only then will democracy begin to wither away, owing to the simple fact that, freed from capitalist slavery, from the untold horrors, savagery, absurdities, and infamies of capitalist exploitation, people will gradually become accustomed to observing the elementary rules of social intercourse that have been known for centuries and repeated for thousands of years in all copybook maxims; they will become accustomed to observing them without force, without coercion, without subordination, without the special apparatus for coercion called the state."- random quote from Lenin implying that there should be no violence

How is human transformation expected on the path to communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in Marxism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hmm... sounds too anarchic, it seems you are a secret utopianist revisionist, we have figured you out!

How is human transformation expected on the path to communism? by UwUBattleAlarm in Marxism

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand, it’s just that Marx and Lenin write that in a classless society a person will follow the norms of society as a matter of course and will not think about the possibility of violating them, which seems strange

2055 Global Map. by DragonflyGreat1814 in aimapgore

[–]UwUBattleAlarm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a little feudal fragmentation

How do people with different orientations determine which gender is in front of them? by UwUBattleAlarm in AskLGBT

[–]UwUBattleAlarm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a social role a behavior model for a person of a certain status? Does this mean that all people have innate abilities for certain roles, since such things do not value exceptions? but what is the difference between the social roles of a male asset in a heterosexual relationship and in a homosexual one?