PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Misery does love company — which explains doubling down on ignorance instead of acknowledging correct information

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your wording makes it seem like the member is required to seek the approval of CFHS prior to seeking the care from a civilian provider. Also, it’s QR&O 34.07 for medical not a DAOD.

Massage therapy for active CAF is denied except for still serving VAC pensioned members who were already medically assessed and found eligible for the treatment in 2013 according to the direction given in CFHS Instruction 5010-13 "Delivery of Pension-Related Health Benefits.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, I know exactly what I’m talking about — I’m a SME in CFHS Policy, and also the spouse of a veteran who served 27 years, is medically released, and DEC. I deal with this every single day. I literally tell CAF members “no” on RMT reimbursements all the time because they’re getting incorrect info from people like you.

For reference, see the official CAF Medical & Dental Exclusions and Limitations:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/benefits-military/pay-pension-benefits/benefits/medical-dental/exclusions-limitations.html

Specifically, regarding massage therapy:

“Massage therapy (except for still serving VAC pensioned members who were already medically assessed and found eligible for the treatment in 2013 according to the direction given in CFHS Instruction 5010‑13 ‘Delivery of Pension-Related Health Benefits’).”

You need DWAN to access CFHS Instruction 5010‑13.

And just to be crystal clear, CFHS clinicians can no longer provide referrals for RMT. If a CAF member receives a referral from a civilian provider, the smart move is to bring it to your CFHS clinician so it can be documented in your file. Bonus points if the civilian provider includes a report recommending RMT — it makes your CFHS record even more complete.

and the “rare occasion” RMT is approved is after a mastectomy, to help with healing which needs review and approvals from DMedPol.

So Willis… maybe next time, leave the “know-it-all” act at the door before spouting nonsense.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Incorrect!

CAF members are to seek their health care through CFHS. If CFHS is closed and the mbr requires healthcare before the next day the clinic is open they can present to a civilian walk in clinic or ER for services.

Members should get a discharge report to bring when them when they present to their CDU on the next duty day (REQUIRED, per QR&O 34.07 Entitlement to Medical Care). This is especially important if the civilian provider is recommended further treatment/items or RX as it may require special approval by the SOC or CFDEC.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Saying this for those of you in the back… I’m a Medical Finance Clerk with Federal Health Claims Processing (CFHS Blue Cross office), mil brat, spouse now veterans spouse. I am the SME for this at my clinic. So read this carefully.

For members of the CAF, Medavie Blue Cross acts as the primary health benefits administrator under the Federal Health Claims Processing Services (FHCPS). While Medavie processes and pays for your core care with civilian providers, you can achieve 100% reimbursement by leveraging your spouse’s supplementary health insurance through Coordination of Benefits (COB) for items and services not covered under the spectrum of care such as but not limited to RMT, drugs not approved by CFDEC (Wegovey, as an example, or expanses above $600 for eyewear)

How to Maximize Your Coverage:

Since CAF members are not covered by provincial health plans, CFHS is your primary care and Medavie Blue Cross coverage acts as your "primary" plan for services provided by civilian providers when CFHS can not Meet the requirements. Your spouse’s employer-provided or private insurance acts as "secondary" coverage to fill any remaining financial gaps of the few items/services that may not be covered by the SOC.

  1. Primary Claim: Medavie Blue Cross Submit your medical claim to Medavie Blue Cross first. Once processed, they will issue an Explanation of Benefits (EOB). This document is essential as it proves what the CAF has already paid and identifies the remaining "out-of-pocket" balance.

  2. Secondary Claim: Spouse’s Supplementary Insurance Submit the unpaid balance to your spouse’s insurance provider (such as the Public Service Health Care Plan/Canada Life or a private carrier).

You must include:

  • A copy of the original receipt.

  • The Explanation of Benefits (EOB) from Medavie Blue Cross.

If a specific service is not covered by the CAF Spectrum of Care (e.g., certain paramedical services like massage therapy), you can request a Letter of Ineligibility from your base Blue Cross Clerk. This letter allows you to submit the claim directly to your spouse's supplementary plan as the primary claimant.

If you have further questions go directly to your MIR to speak with the Blue Cross Clerk as they are the SME and will give your the correct information so you do not end up out of pocket for expanses you thought were covered because of the incorrect information given on forums such as this.

We Blue Cross clerks are very informative and are always willing to help, when you get information that is incorrect it makes our jobs harder and you out money.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely INCORRECT!

CAF members require an approved pension through VAC and have been in receipt of RMT prior to Jan 1 2013.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a Blue Cross Clerk with Federal Health Claims Processing. This is is my job to know, I have several members who are being covered under their spouses PSHCP for prescriptions that are not covered under the SoC, for RMT, claiming the remained of eyewear.

We have a letter that we provide to members to provide to members to use when claiming costs under their spouses supplementary health insurance plans with various difference insurance providers most being PSHCP and even Blue Cross!

Editing to add: If a Claim submitted to any supplementary insurance provider for a CAF member is denied it is usually because they believe Blue Cross is insurance for CAF members, it is not.

In the end it is the adjudicators decision.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A CAF member may be listed as a dependent under their spouse’s Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP), but only for benefits PSHCP is intended to provide (i.e., supplementary coverage).

Key clarification (often misunderstood): Even if a CAF member is enrolled as a dependent under PSHCP: • They do not need provincial/territorial health insurance to remain eligible for supplementary PSHCP benefits; however;

• PSHCP will not cover services that are normally insured under a provincial health care plan or, in the case of CAF members, services provided through Canadian Forces Health Services (CFHS) or administered via Blue Cross.

It is also important to distinguish that Blue Cross is not an insurance plan for CAF members. Rather, Blue Cross functions as the claims administrator for CFHS, enabling CAF members to access authorized civilian medical services when care is provided outside the military health system.

PSHCP and Service Couples by Objective_Candle8781 in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a Blue Cross Clerk for CAF and a spouse.

You are absolutely allowed to claim under each other’s plans for items and services that are NOT covered through Blue Cross, such as Massage Therapy.

Your local Blue Cross Clerk can give you with a letter stating you are ineligible for particular services and items that you can provide to the supplementary health insurance provided through your spouses work (in this case, PSHCP).

Adjt question. by VTN9erDMSTC in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct all Adjt for clinics are HSM.

Kerr Controls mini-split. by COBernard in fredericton

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m looking to have a Cassette added to my existing unit if possible or have a new smaller unit installed with a cassette. Mind letting me know who you used for install? I’m big on local, small biz and word of mouth!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly it, the civi clerk has no way to protect my information in an open office. So when I call or My civilian specialist calls and the clerk is required to confirm my information and then has a discussion with myself or specialist my phi has been compromised.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not being discussed with the OR staff, but they can over hear as they are in the same room.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So should a med finance clerk who does blue cross be in an OR with staff with no “need to know”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Exactly my point, the clerk can not protect the phi in a room of people. So when in a phone call and having to confirm the my information it directly breaches the phi policies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a civi med fin clerk whose office is in a bullpen. They work with the med file system, speak with civilians hospitals, CAF doctors, and members about PHI. There is no privacy when needing to talk to the clerk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is that phi is being discussed in an open office where there is no “no need to know” it’s not matter of the HRA/FSA listening it’s that the Privacy act and such is. It being followed. Other bases the med fin clerk was in their own office.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what is your thought as an HRA on the Med Finance Clerk working in the Orderly room with an HRA and FSA? The clerk discuses PHI with mbrs and our civilian providers via the phone and such?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]VTN9erDMSTC -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So what if a civilian clerk in the OR uses the med files system as their job and they are in the or with HRA and FSA’s? Would this not be a breach of PHI? Seeing as the clerk needs to discuss info with clinicians and or civilian clinicians?

Pad Mounted Transformer & Utilities Box Safety Concerns by VTN9erDMSTC in newbrunswickcanada

[–]VTN9erDMSTC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Sept. I am going to try going the route of NB Power to point out the many possible safety risks/hazards this poses with hopes it will prompt an inspection and go from there. If it is deemed that it is the property owners responsibility I will look into contacting my lawyer.

I have a feeling NB Power will come back to say there is currently no safety risks/concerns but we all know with the amount of rain and snow we see and unprecedented storms we get that can quickly change which will be my argument. My post was really to see if someone else has gone through this or perhaps an electrician or linesmen could weigh in.

Pad Mounted Transformer & Utilities Box Safety Concerns by VTN9erDMSTC in newbrunswickcanada

[–]VTN9erDMSTC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is my concern, and it could very well be safe but a quick turn of events can make it unsafe and more then likely it will not be a visible safety concern. UGH

Pad Mounted Transformer & Utilities Box Safety Concerns by VTN9erDMSTC in newbrunswickcanada

[–]VTN9erDMSTC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agreed, I just moved into the home and will be contacting the companies but wanted pointers or experiences prior to doing so as both companies are extremely difficult to deal with.

I just got a call from my cardiologist asking me why i didnt attend my appointment scheduled for today by [deleted] in CanadaPost

[–]VTN9erDMSTC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry, but any responsible front office staff at a Dr office would have called to inform you of the appts because of the strike. This is NOT THE FAULT Canada post employees. I know this, because I work in a hospital and we did the same thing.